The recent purge of top military officials from China's Central Military Commission serves as a political Rorschach test, revealing more about observers' biases than about Chinese governance itself. Anti-China hawks and Xi skeptics predictably frame these removals as evidence of systemic incompetence and dictatorial paranoia, particularly given the relentless nature of Xi's anti-corruption drive.
Yet this interpretation overlooks a crucial inconsistency: if "saving face" truly governed Xi's decision-making—as Western analysts often claim about Chinese culture—why would he publicly humiliate and prosecute officials with whom he has longstanding personal connections? The very public nature of these harsh charges suggests either that the corruption allegations have substance or that Xi's political calculus operates on principles more complex than simple face-saving concerns.
I am resisting the urge to use the C word but you know what are really latching on any wins they can get recently as the established world order is crumbling around them. When even Chinese libs know what’s up you know that things are dire…
View attachment 168685
“If the war is lost, the people will be lost also. It is not necessary to worry about what the German people will need for elemental survival. On the contrary, it is best for us to destroy even these things. For the nation has proved to be the weaker, and the future belongs solely to the stronger eastern nation. In any case only those who are inferior will remain after this struggle, for the good have already been killed.”
— Adolf Hitler, April 1945 from Berlin Bunker.