does nuclear weapon force Japan to surrender or it is the soviet ?

Status
Not open for further replies.

ahadicow

Junior Member
You can stop right there, because you are now making up your own definition for words.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!




So no, not all killings are murders. If you think all killings are equally wrong, then I'm not going to argue with you except to say that I disagree completely.

you decide for yourself what moral burdern to put on each case of killing. I'm not here to tell you what is right and wrong. You should be your own moral authority. Just listen to yourself.

What I try to warn you against. is those "justifications", "legality", "rationalities","ethics". You better examine those very carefully, they are most times presumptious, self-serving and backwards. They are the product of your culture trying to deal with morality on one hand and reality on the other. You sometime like to follow those, because they are easier to follow than your moral intuition, but easy != right. that's all the advice I can offer.
 

advill

Junior Member
The North Korea has tested a 3rd Nuclear Device, much to the consternation of China, South Korea, Japan, Russia, the US and Members of the UN Security Council. Only a Crazy & Uncaring, Self Centred Leadership & its Military would do such a thing. We wait to see what serious sanctions would be brought against North Korea, & whether this country will continue to be belligerant & carry out more nuclear tests as approved by its leader young Kim & his Military Hawks.

South Korea, Japan & the US as declared North Korean potential targets will NO LONGER tolerate the blackmails & threats & actions (Remember sinking of the South Korean corvette, launching of long-range "test" ballistic missiles in waters off Japan; now long range missile threats to the US West Coast). This is no longer tolerated by peace loving and level-headed countries. Those who backed N. Korea inc. a long-standing Security Pact must now realise what a "mad" leadership could do. So, the present discourse of Nuclear Weapon to force surrender of Japan during WW II must be seen in the right perspective. The seriousness of extrapolation of this "A-Bombs" destructions of Nagasaki & Hiroshima benefits NO BODY except those who want to use "history" as an example to "teach" Japan a lesson or some other reasons. The Japanese will NEVER tolerate threats & will defend themselves to the hilt - they have been anticipating THREATS from Kim & his be"MAD"elled Military Generals, & ANYONE ELSE. May countries & their Leaders come to their senses, less INNOCENT people will suffer & our world be destroyed. God help us!!




We only fear nuclear weapons today *because* of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. We have MAD because we've *SEEN* what nuclear weapons can do.

You say you're not judging Truman, but immediately after say what he did was wrong. Kind of contradictory, don't you think?

Add to that, your very next statement is to force a judgement on a historical event in order to conform to a particular value system. That's what they call revisionism.
 

bd popeye

The Last Jedi
VIP Professional
I can see this is going no where...FAST...Let me help you history revisionist out..

The US dropped an A- bomb on Hiroshima..The Japanese did not blink..A few days later the US dropped another A-bomb on Nagasaki.. the Japanese blinked twice...a delayed reaction to the first bomb..War over US wins.. simple.

And Guess what? This thread is closed..and do not send me a PM asking me to re-open this thread.....


THREAD CLOSED

bd popeye super moderator
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top