supercat
Major
Good institutions don’t come out of nowhere. GDP per capita has to rise along with better institutions. The performance of the Chinese gov’t is better than expected consider where China is in terms of development.
Idk how many of you remember the Swine flu in the US.
“Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimated that about 59 million Americans contracted the H1N1 virus, 265,000 were hospitalized as a result, and 12,000 died.“ wiki for 2009 swine flu
“
In 1976, an outbreak of the swine flu, at , New Jersey caused one death, hospitalized 13, and led to a mass immunization program. After the program began, the vaccine was associated with an increase in reports of , which can cause paralysis, respiratory arrest, and death. The immunization program was ended after approximately 25% of the population of the United States had been administered the vaccine.
Richard Krause, Director of the from 1975 to 1984, writes that the government response to the swine flu outbreak was considered to be too fast and the response to the AIDS epidemic too slow.”- 1976 swine flu
I agree that how good a nation's healthcare institutions and its public health system are strongly correlated to that country's economic development. For example, richer countries almost always have longer life expectancy and lower infant mortality rate than poorer countries, maybe with the exception of the U.S. Even China, with a fraction of its per capita income, .
Can you help me explain " the severe case ", are they come with severe pneumonia or they came with mild symptoms and became severe ( pneumonia )?
and after how many days it will ( in average / statistic ) increase death?
Well, your guess is as well as mine. I think severe cases = those who admitted with confirmed viral pneumonia + those who have confirmed coronavirus infection and have developed pneumonia at the hospital
This is definitely a institutional failure on part of China. That politicians can overrule doctors on medical issue's. It reminds me of those horror movies where the hero is warning of the impending danger while the local authorities are trying to sweep the danger under the carpet for economic reasons. This is much more than just Wuhan this is what is happening all over China. All local authorities operate more or less the same way. The CDC in China needs more resources and power to act during early stages of a potential outbreak.
And yes the practise of eating exotic animals needs to stop.
In the healthcare system, . An institution failure or not, once a mistake has been made, the best way to deal with it is to conduct a thorough investigation called root cause analysis (RCA). The purpose of RCA is not to assign blame and punish those who might be at fault per se. The purpose of RCA is to find the cause of the systemic error, so lessons can be learned and future mishaps can be prevented. The job of the Chinese authority at this point is to separate those who abused their political power from those who made poor professional judgements, while the former should be reprimanded, the latter may still be rehabilitated.
I agree exotic animal markets should have been shutdown nationwide after SARS, to reduce the chance of such epidemics, prevent animal cruelty, and protect endangered species.
February update, daily (cumulative):
2/1: confirmed 2,590 (14,380), suspected 4,562 (19,544*), severe case 315 (2,110), death 45 (304), cured 85 (328), under observation: 137,594 nation-wide
2/2: confirmed 2,829 (17,205), suspected 5,173 (21,558*), severe case 186 (2,296), death 57 (361), cured 147 (475), under observation: 152,700 nation-wide
2/3: confirmed 3,235 (20,438), suspected 5,072 (23,214*), severe case 492 (2,788), death 64 (425), cured 157 (634), under observation: 171,329 nation-wide
2/4: confirmed 3,887 (24,324), suspected 3,971 (23,260*), severe case 431 (3,219), death 65 (490), cured 262 (892), under observation: 185,555 nation-wide
2/5: confirmed 3,694 (28,018), suspected 5,328 (24,702*), severe case 640 (3,859), death 73 (563), cured 261 (1,153), under observation: 186,354 nation-wide
2/6: confirmed 3,143 (31,161), suspected 4,833 (26,359*), severe case 962 (4,821), death 73 (636), cured 387 (1,540), under observation: 186,045 nation-wide
2/7: confirmed 3,399 (34,546), suspected 4,214 (27,657 *), severe case 1,280 (6,101), death 86 (722), cured 510 (2,050), under observation: 189,660 nation-wide
*cumulative suspected = cumulative suspected on the previous day + daily suspected – those who tested positive or negative on the same day (my personal unofficial interpretation)