This is a perfect case study on how someone at Bloomberg doesn't know how to read a graph. Or his boss commanded him to strong arm a factually incorrect statement into a graph that says something entirely different, perhaps even betting on the likelihood that the readers also don't know how to read it.
They are adding more sands to bury their heads in. How pathetic. They might as well ban "China" throughout the country and declare having defeated "a certain enemy" in the Cold War 2.0.
In addition to “climate change” and “green,” EERE forbid officials from using “emissions” to avoid the implication that they are a negative.
Other terms officials must ditch include “energy transition,” “sustainability/sustainable,” “‘clean’ or ‘dirty’ energy,” “Carbon/CO2 ‘Footprint’” and “Tax breaks/tax credits/subsidies.”
China aims to nearly double battery storage by 2027 in $35 billion plan
After the European Union–imposed fragmentation of the public energy provider, a continuous looting has begun. The price of electricity is “regulated” by an energy "stock-exchange" consisting of just five (!!!) private companies — the very definition of a cartel. This means that any private individual can install renewable energy sources and, as an external partner of these five companies, receive dividends. The price has somewhat stabilized at around +70% compared to four years ago, though at times it has reached +200%. Why? Because with the “marginal pricing” system, the price is determined by the most expensive form of electricity production in the country — which, of course, is natural gas.Southern Europe has been installing cheap Chinese solar like crazy.
Also incredible growth in some Northern European countries.
Solar has been displacing carbon fuels.