chinese small arms thread
- Thread starter MIGleader
- Start date
UCSDAE
New Member
not suprise at all. there all reports that arms dealers, in lieu with the ppl in charge of savage dumps and refurbish old, used up weapons or weapon system to sale to buyers that are.. a bit cash strapped...or are facing a transportation problem(like the insurgents in Iraq, although I doubt they lack any of this).
As for the hissing and smoke problem with the 95, the smoke is from too much lube. if u use too much, that's what happens. but switching from conventional layout to bullup is a bit of getting use to.
Type 03 is....i dont like it, just personal opinion.
As for the hissing and smoke problem with the 95, the smoke is from too much lube. if u use too much, that's what happens. but switching from conventional layout to bullup is a bit of getting use to.
Type 03 is....i dont like it, just personal opinion.
Last edited:
what don't you like about type-03, i want to hear your opinion. For me i am indifferent as it looks like the type-81 in some ways
UCSDAE
New Member
it's one of those thing that u just dont like but u cant quiet explain why. However, the type 95 does offer tactical flexibilty because of it's length and is easy to manuver in CQC,and that is a advantage bullpup has over conventional layout. The type 03,if it were to obtain the same flexibility, has to have a retractable/foldable stock, just like the M4 and M16 in Iraq. besides, if u fold or retract the stock, that would just kinda make your conventional layout rifle into a de facto bullpup.
if u fired an AK with the stock folded(or any assault rifle for that matter), u will realized that it becomes even more difficult to control the recoil and fire with acceptable accuracy. This might be so for me cuz i m a noob when it comes to marksmanship(comparing to some of our members).
if u fired an AK with the stock folded(or any assault rifle for that matter), u will realized that it becomes even more difficult to control the recoil and fire with acceptable accuracy. This might be so for me cuz i m a noob when it comes to marksmanship(comparing to some of our members).
Last edited:
I can't imagine anyone who can fire better with folded stocks. Afterall, your shoulder is much more rigid than your jointy hands. If you shoot a gun without stock, you split the recoil in 2 instead of 3, what'd you expect?
There is no reason for there to be a Type 03 (or 05 for that matter) IMO when you have the Type 81.
Come to think, this just sounds like going from Rk-62 to 76 to 95.
That Type 81 could be coming from Afghanistan too, as it does share border with China and Pakistan. (I hope that soldier is from the Bay Area.)
There is no reason for there to be a Type 03 (or 05 for that matter) IMO when you have the Type 81.
Come to think, this just sounds like going from Rk-62 to 76 to 95.
That Type 81 could be coming from Afghanistan too, as it does share border with China and Pakistan. (I hope that soldier is from the Bay Area.)
I can't imagine anyone who can fire better with folded stocks. Afterall, your shoulder is much more rigid than your jointy hands. If you shoot a gun without stock, you split the recoil in 2 instead of 3, what'd you expect?
There is no reason for there to be a Type 03 (or 05 for that matter) IMO when you have the Type 81.
Come to think, this just sounds like going from Rk-62 to 76 to 95.
That Type 81 could be coming from Afghanistan too, as it does share border with China and Pakistan. (I hope that soldier is from the Bay Area.)
just wondering, what was the difference internally between type-81,97 and 03/05??? all i know is that 81 is ussing the russian round while the other use the 5.8mm round
