WS-9
Its a Rolls Royce Spey basically. Pretty neat to see its still around.
Good enough as a glide bomb/cruise missile truck.
Those are good parameters. They improved an old engine to have the same TBO and lifespan as US engines from the '90s.Supposed engineView attachment 166076
JIutian mothership equipped with Non-afterburner variant of WS-9.Speaking of which, do we know if the WS-9 on the Jetank UAVs are taken from the retired JH-7/As and refurbished + afterburner section removed, or does the Jetank use brand new WS-9 engines?

Well there must be at least 400-600 WS-9s in the JH-7 fleet, if we assume 2 per aircraft installed plus spares (1 per aircraft?).JIutian mothership equipped with Non-afterburner variant of WS-9.
official promo released at Zhuhai airshow last year.
View attachment 166080
Engine is most likely taken out from retired JH-7 aircraft and refurbished then used in this UAV. newly manufactured engine doesn't make sense. you need to re-open closed production line with tools/equipment and skilled technicians. its only possible when you are planning to produce this UAV in hundreds.
so WS-9 production largely depend on this UAV serial production.
JIutian mothership equipped with Non-afterburner variant of WS-9.
….
so WS-9 production largely depend on this UAV serial production.
yeah, the guancha guys actually talked about this exact topic today. Seems like the team behind WS-9 project kept working on it with different proposals and the non-AB one finally found a customer.I actually question, the WS-9 is still in production?!!
This would be a pretty smart move actually. I wonder if we can identify other components of that airframe as being recycled (landing gear, etc). These drone motherships are going to be rather expendable, so make them as cheaply as possible.Speaking of which, do we know if the WS-9 on the Jetank UAVs are taken from the retired JH-7/As and refurbished + afterburner section removed, or does the Jetank use brand new WS-9 engines?