chinese land tactics and training

MIGleader

Banned Idiot
in close air combat it probably would, but if it was bvr, the eagle would have a highewr chance of winning.

if china put a new radar like bars or an elta on its su-27s, it could be a formidable match for an f-15.
 

Su-27 Pilot

Junior Member
MIGleader said:
in close air combat it probably would, but if it was bvr, the eagle would have a highewr chance of winning.

if china put a new radar like bars or an elta on its su-27s, it could be a formidable match for an f-15.

I read some paper on the new Su-27 SM's overall perforamance including its computer and radar and other electronic warfare components which has to be one of the world's top for a fighter jets.
 

Gollevainen

Colonel
VIP Professional
Registered Member
Yes sure SU-27 is formitable warplane, but it has NOTHING to do whit chinese LAND warfare. No more aircraft depate!!
 

Su-27 Pilot

Junior Member
rommel said:
What kind of tactics does the PLA use ?? Their training consist of what ??

It depends on the battlefield. For Taiwan PLA will use "cross-drive forward" which includes MBT and fast armored attack vehicles and infantry advances under the cover from Army aviation and PLAAF.
 

MIGleader

Banned Idiot
they probably will send advance troops likme paratroopers and marines to gain a foothold in taiwan first, then let them hold out till the army arrives.
 

pathfinder

New Member
MIGleader said:
would you also believe some of the other stuff the kid said?
M1 has hologram projecters
M1 feature ERA
M1 can fire a nuke.

f-15E is mor manuverable than flankers
F-15E feature Hms

m-16 is more reliable than ak-47
m-16 can fire rounds at 1000 yards
Actually the effective range of M-16 is 800 meters or roughly 875 yards so he's not that far off.
 

MIGleader

Banned Idiot
he was very far off. he beilieved it could go 1000+. at 800m, the m-16 is effective, but by no means against armor, even weak armor.

he said chinese missles are cheap crap that always fail

he said the mauser was a copy of the spring field.

he beilieved the us should have nuked russia and china in the 1950's

he thought russian tanks could only hold one round of ammo

do i need to continue?
 

adeptitus

Captain
VIP Professional
BrotherofSnake said:
Does China still use the "human wave" tactic they used in Korea?

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Human wave attack is a military term describing a type of assault performed by infantry units, in which soldiers attack in successive line formations.

Such attacks are common in all poorly equipped armies, or where the objective is of strategic importance. It is a tactic that developed out of trench warfare, where artillery or aerial attack often proved ineffective at dislodging the enemy from a firmly held defensive position.

The casualty rate is generally enormous, yet such attacks are often successful and therefore remain an accepted combat technique.

When Nazi Germany attacked the Soviet Union in 1941, the Soviets fought back with human waves of Red Army troops against both advancing and entrenched enemy soldiers. Usually the Red Army soldiers were told to charge directly in a wide berth to strike every possible point in the German lines. In some battles the Soviets defeated the Germans after sustaining battle losses equal to or more than the German losses. However, in the Winter War, the Soviets found out the hard way that the attack coupled with a "no retreat" policy is highly vulnerable to the motti countertactic, where the attacking party is surrounded and sieged.

There is also the myth that it was a tactic that was employed widely and successfully by the North Korean and Chinese armies during the Korean War, because to the UN troops, the enemy seemed to be everywhere. However, what the communist forces actually used is more aptly described as inflitration assault, since it is necessary to sneak past the enemy and complete the encirclement before heavy fighting begins.

During the 1950s, the Viet Minh, under the command of General Giap, successfully used the human wave attack method against the entrenched French garrison at Dien Bien Phu (Vietnam), shocking the French government into seeking an end to the conflict in Indochina.

Human waves were also rampant in the Iran-Iraq War. Iran was the primary user of these tactics, as it had the less technologically advanced army. Iraq responded with biological and chemical weapons of mass destruction.

Countermeasures to such attacks may also involve extreme firepower superiority, generally of a technologically or organizationally superior nature; for example, the British army used machine guns and organized rifle volleys to great effect against opposing forces armed only with primitive weapons and a few guns.
 
Top