Do you have those cutaways? Because if you don't and that is your standard of proof, the conclusion shouldn't be to trust one source over another, but to hold a position of more information needed. Otherwise you are as biased as you claim others of being.No problem, no need to continue the discussion but you are using visual opinion, do you have blue prints or cutaways of WS-10 and AL-31?, do you have a detailed scheme of each and every part?
Do you know that actually the F-101 had a derivative called F-110 or and the F-100 had another derivative called PW1120, also the R-13 and R-25 were derived from the R-11 tumansky in China know as WP-13 and WP-7, a derivative is as based upon a AL-31, that is the whole concept.
see F-101 and F-110
R-11 and R-25