Chinese Economics Thread

Hendrik_2000

Lieutenant General
More at the link. Somewhat pessimistic, but Michael Pettis suspicion's seem to ring rather true; more than just food production or other transient factors are driving inflation.

This guy has been waiting for years for his prediction to come true I say food price will come down in coming months and there is only slight increase industrial good index Just couple years ago it was the Non performing loan and Chinese banking system that will be the waterloo of Chinese economy. You know what Beijing recapitalize the bank and privatize most of them Problem solved
 

SampanViking

The Capitalist
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
No doubt about it. Farm gate prices fell through the floor over the last couple of decades in the UK and probably worldwide. The sudden surge in demand for foodstuffs has come like manna from Heaven for many UK farmers who have been losing money year on year for ages.

Grain prices are up from £15p/t last year to over £60p/t now. This means large areas of land left fallow since the early nineties are going back under the Plough this year, so by mid year and into Autumn, food prices should stabilise and start to fall back again.

Who though would have bet money on this situation that EU countries would become the breadbasket for China!!
 

Hendrik_2000

Lieutenant General
Lost in the mambo jumbo of macro economic, is the real gain of Chinese productivity and "moving up the value" as Chinese industries shedding the low value product. Here is the article that confirmed my thesis Following the well trodden path of Japan and Korea

The inuendo of currencies manipulation and constant badgering to raise the exchange rate will only hasten the tranformation and make Chinese industry more competitive. So careful what you wished Mr Paulson You might not like what you get!

From New York Times
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


SHANGHAI

“The RMB is killing me,” groaned Jin Jue.

Mr. Jin, a hip-looking 35-year-old with spiky hair and an all-black ensemble, describes himself on his business card as the “board chairman” of the Shanghai Jinjue Fashion Company. It was my first full day in China, and Mr. Jin was showing me around his factory on the outskirts of town.

RMB, of course, is shorthand for renminbi, the Chinese currency, also known as the yuan, which, since the beginning of the year, has risen more than 4 percent against the declining dollar. Even as the Chinese economy has become increasingly powerful, the government has kept the yuan artificially low, much to the annoyance of the United States. Truth to tell, it is still not nearly as high as it would be if it were unmoored from government control. When the Treasury secretary, Henry Paulson Jr., was in Beijing this week, he praised the recent rise of the yuan though — as he invariably does when he’s in China — he called on Chinese officials to let their currency float freely.

This is my first trip to China and, like most Americans, I had an image of what a Chinese factory looked like. Mr. Jin’s operation fit that image almost to a T. It was housed in a run-down building amid a sea of run-down buildings in the Kun Shan industrial zone, just northwest of Shanghai. Except for Mr. Jin’s own office, it was really just one cavernous room, filled with rows of tables, on which stood old-fashioned sewing machines. There was a cafeteria with rickety wooden chairs and beaten-up tables where the workers ate their meals, and a sad-looking dormitory where they slept. Behind the building was a dirty-looking river. Debris littered its banks.

Mr. Jin’s factory also makes the sort of thing you expect a Chinese factory to make: it churns out inexpensive clothing, aimed at the European market. Mr. Jin is the classic low-cost, tight-margin, squeeze-every-penny manufacturer, the kind of entrepreneur who has been the backbone of China’s astounding economic rise — and who has also been the primary beneficiary of the low yuan, which has spurred the market for China’s cheap goods. On the day I visited, his work force was making tan jackets under the French brand Camaïeu.

Except ... where were all the workers? I had expected the place to be teeming with people. Instead, only about a quarter of the room was in use; Mr. Jin later confirmed that 60 percent of his work force had either quit or been laid off. Business, clearly, was terrible, and Mr. Jin was losing money.

What the low yuan giveth, the rising yuan taketh away. As China’s currency has risen, Mr. Jin’s cheap clothes suddenly aren’t so cheap anymore. And he had other problems as well. “The business environment in Europe is bad,” he said through a translator. Thanks to inflation in China — up 8.7 percent in February alone — his workers wanted more than the several hundred dollars or so a month he says he pays them. The tax rebates he received from the government were shrinking.

Recently, the government passed labor laws that included a series of protections for workers; that was also pushing up his costs. As a result, orders that had once come to him as a matter of course were now gravitating to Vietnam, Mexico and other countries that could undercut him on his only competitive advantage: cost. (I later heard that some Chinese garment manufacturers were putting a “Made in Mexico” tag on their goods and routing them through Mexico to take advantage of Nafta.)

Though he lacked a college education — Mr. Jin had started in business right out of the army, he told me — he had a pretty clear-eyed understanding of what was happening to him. Though factories like his had led the way in China’s economic miracle, the government was not all that terribly interested anymore in having the country be the lowest-cost producer of every good imaginable. Factories that played that game sometimes produced toys that were tainted. And they didn’t necessarily improve the quality of life of their workers. Ultimately, relying on cheap labor to build an economy was a sucker’s game. “If the government lets the RMB keep rising,” Mr. Jin said, “all these factories will go out of business.”

And so it may turn out. But though it may inflict some pain in the short term, over the long haul, it will almost surely be a good thing for the Chinese economy. And it won’t be a lot of fun for the West to watch.
When you travel around China these days and listen to businessmen and analysts, there is a phrase you hear again and again. They all talk about “moving up the value chain.” By that they mean they want their businesses to gravitate toward more complex, higher-value goods — the ones that bring in bigger profits, are less dependent on rock-bottom costs and are more immune to currency fluctuations.

Andrew Rothman, a China strategist with the investment firm CLSA, described it as “a deliberate policy to push manufacturing up the value chain.”

“It is coming at the same time as rising raw material costs. What the Chinese government is saying is that, ‘We don’t want to be the world’s workshop for junk. We want to make higher-value stuff that creates more wealth and better jobs.’ ”

For instance, if you open up, say, an iPod, you’ll find that many of the higher-value components are made in places outside of China—and then brought into the country to be assembled. And, of course, the biggest profit of all goes to the owner of the brand: Apple. The Chinese are no long content to simply assemble the components. They want to make them as well — and own the brand.

In his own way, Mr. Jin understood that, too. On the flip side of his business card was the word “Tousnosamis.” It was, he told me, a fashion brand he had started recently; he had put out several lines of women’s clothing that he was selling in the domestic market. Eventually, he said with a small, self-conscious laugh, he hoped it would become “like Armani.” At the least, it would allow him to be freed from the grinding pressure of being a low-cost manufacturer. “Maybe in 10 years,” he said. It was his dream — and China’s.

The next morning, I met someone who had already fulfilled the dream. His name is Li Xian Shou, and he is the founder and chief executive of a company called ReneSola, which makes the silicon wafers that are used in solar panels.

Mr. Li, 39, looks as uncool as Mr. Jin looks cool; his pink tie was slightly askew and the sleeves of his suit were so long they almost covered his hands. His company, however, is as cool as can be: In the fourth quarter of 2007, its revenue was up nearly 200 percent from the fourth quarter of 2006. Last year, it made $53 million, almost double its 2006 profit, and in January it raised $130 million in a stock offering on the New York Stock Exchange.

The ReneSola factories were also on the outskirts of Shanghai, but that’s where the similarities with Mr. Jin’s factory ended. Mr. Li’s company was expanding like crazy, taking over acre after acre of former farmland, and snapping up plants, dormitories and other facilities as fast as it could. As we toured through Mr. Li’s plants, I was a little stunned to discover that some of the buildings were only six months old; the plaster was nicked and scarred, suggesting a lot of wear and tear. Like many Chinese businessmen, Mr. Li is moving so fast he doesn’t have time to worry about whether the plaster on his walls is smooth.

Before giving me the tour, Mr. Li told me his story (again through a translator). A former government official, he had raised $1.5 million from four friends to start his company in 2001. (Government officials who go into business tend to have the crucial advantage of good connections.) At first, the company assembled solar panels; most of his customers were companies in Germany and Japan that made the wafers and then sold the panels once they were assembled. “By 2003,” he said, “revenue was about $10 million.”

But assembling the panels was the lowest-cost, lowest-value part of the solar industry. “It is a commodity business,” he said. “And it can attract a lot of competition.” So in 2005, he decided to take the big leap. He got out of the solar panel business and into the more profitable solar wafer business.

Now instead of competing with other Chinese companies, he is competing with German and Japanese companies — where his cost advantage is huge. His company has created a technology for using recycled wafers and other materials, which is helping him avert the shortage of polysilicon, the material from which the wafers are made. He employs 3,300 people, up from 20 in 2005, and pays his line operators upward of $500 a month. From a standing start three years ago, ReneSola is among the world’s top five suppliers of solar wafers.

When I asked Mr. Li about the effect of the rising yuan, he gave me an indifferent shrug. Because his wafers are shipped to other Chinese companies — the panel assemblers — instead of exported, he can demand payment in yuan. His is a business that relies on complicated machinery at least as much as manual labor, so he can work toward productivity improvements. And because he is making a product with a much higher profit margin than a solar panel’s, he can more easily absorb a currency hit. So far, he said, the money lost from the rise of the yuan was “trivial.”

As we toured his plant, I couldn’t help noticing that much of the machinery ReneSola uses to make wafers came from Germany. A rising yuan helps Mr. Li there, too.

As the Chinese say, Be careful what you wish for, Mr. Paulson.
 
Last edited:

Norfolk

Junior Member
VIP Professional
No doubt about it. Farm gate prices fell through the floor over the last couple of decades in the UK and probably worldwide. The sudden surge in demand for foodstuffs has come like manna from Heaven for many UK farmers who have been losing money year on year for ages.

Grain prices are up from £15p/t last year to over £60p/t now. This means large areas of land left fallow since the early nineties are going back under the Plough this year, so by mid year and into Autumn, food prices should stabilise and start to fall back again.

Who though would have bet money on this situation that EU countries would become the breadbasket for China!!

Yes, it is something of a surprise, but not an unwelcome one. Especially for British farmers, given what they had to go through over the last decade or so. But, rising food prices are rising food prices, which hits ordinary people hard, and the farmers themselves only get a small percentage of that price. Since hedge funds have started to move into the agriculture sector, this is not exactly heartening news:

"
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
", by Sam Nelson, Reuters, Thursday, March 27, 2008:

CHICAGO (Reuters) - The presence of hedge funds in the U.S. agricultural sector expanded on Thursday with the sale of ConAgra Foods Inc's (CAG.N:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
,
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
,
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
) grain business to Ospraie, as speculators increasingly tie their futures trades to physical markets.

Trade sources said the sale was also a sign of tough times for grain companies which must find ways to protect against wild swings in the futures market and raise extra money for margin calls due to a credit crunch.

ConAgra said earlier Thursday it would sell its commodity trading and merchandising operations to Ospraie Special Opportunities fund, an affiliate of investment management firm Ospraie Management.

More at the link. If you think speculation in the credit world could have serious consequences, speculation on food prices could be even worse.

Hendrick 2000 wrote:

Lost in the mambo jumbo of macro economic, is the real gain of Chinese productivity and "moving up the value" as Chinese industries shedding the low value product.

Value-added; it's China's foreseeable future. Just wait until the Chinese auto industry gets into the (international, never mind domestic) market in a big way. German machinery, Chinese entrepreneurship. Potent combination.

"
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
", by Radoslaw Sikorski, Foreign Minister of Poland, The Straits Times, Saturday, 5 April, 2008 (via LexisNexis News):

THIRTY years ago, after a period of upheaval, China embarked on a course of modernisation and opening to the world. In a remarkably short period of time, the country made a genuine 'great leap forward', becoming one of the leading global powers. China's growing clout has become a challenge both to the United States and the European Union (EU).

There is an obvious asymmetry in the EU-US-China triangle. To the US, China is a political and economic partner. But though they have correct relations, the US also increasingly views China as a political and military rival. To the EU, China is primarily an economic and trading partner. It is that area that has dominated the political - and even more so, the military - sphere.

China, too, mainly perceives the EU as a partner in commerce rather than in geopolitics, considering it a more or less cohesive coalition of states rather than a single entity. Unlike the US, the EU has no military presence in Asia, though it is important to China as a potential supplier of technologies. The EU, which adheres to the principle of democratic co-decision - alien to China - is the easier partner compared with the US, though less predictable.

More at the link. There are certainly differences in approach between the EU and the US in their respective dealings with China, and not least because the EU is by no means a unitary player; each country still sets it own policy and deciedes its own approach. But the US has much more to lose than the EU does if relations with China go badly, so even if the EU is easier for China to deal with in many ways, the EU is also exposed to much less dire consequences if relations with China go bad. In some ways, the EU is more free to deal with China as it would like to, than the the US, which finds itself obligated to tread rather more delicately, given the military tensions between it and China.

Advance look at "
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
", by Michael Pettis, Far Eastern Economic Review, Vol. 171, No. 2, March 2008 (full article to appear in the April 2008 edition):

Sharply rising food prices combined with stable prices for other goods have made it seem to many as if Chinese inflation is primarily a problem of food supply constraints, and one that will be resolved by late 2008 as agricultural production returns to normal expected levels. In a Feb. 4 article in the Financial Times, however, Massachusetts Institute of Technology professor Kenneth Rogoff argued that “Those who believe that the cause of China’s inflation is too little pork, rather than too much money, are seriously mistaken.” His formulation—“pork” versus “money”—represents the two competing models that seek to explain Chinese inflation. The pork model claims that inflation in China is a food problem caused by a short-term supply constraint. The money model claims that inflation is the result of several years of furious money expansion set into motion by a currency regime that sharply restricts the ability of the PBOC to conduct domestic monetary policy.

More at the link. This, of course, is the issue that China economy-watchers can debate until the cows come home, and only a defining economic event, or series of events (best to be avoided, obviously), will provide absolutely incontrovertible evidence of one or the other to all but the most die-hard partisans. Personally, I tend to agree with Michael Pettis' and similar analyses. The full article could be an interesting read later this month. And here is Pettis' blog entry for yesterday:

"
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
", by Michael Pettis, China Financial Markets, 2008-04-04:

Nonetheless as long as there is a sense that the fundamental problem is a food-supply constraint, the government continues to try to encourage an expansion in agricultural expansion. Amid spreading talk around Asia of a rice crisis, Jiang Dingzhi, vice chairman of the China Banking Regulatory Commission, urged banks yesterday to ensure loans and credit to grain producers and other agriculture-related enterprises, even while they maintained strict loan caps. In an effort that I think is unlikely to bear much fruit, Jiang even urged rural cooperatives, commercial and policy banks to “follow credit ethics and take on their social responsibilities to support rural development,” according to a Xinhua report today. I am not sure appealing to their “better” instincts is an effective way to get the responsible parties to do what the government wants, but even if these kinds of appeals are successful in raising agricultural production, it will just make it easier for inflationary pressures to show up in the non-food component.

Hope, of course, is not a plan, but it almost seems to be the case here, that an increase in food production will help to set things right. An increase in food production is certainly needed, but until such time as it is possible to fully mechanize agricultural production in China, any production increases are unlikely to achieve decisive results. And even if that were achieved, what to do with the hundreds of millions of farmers and their families who would be displaced from their occupation by mechanization? In some ways, China is trying to leap from the 18 century to the 21st century within two or three generations. What has been achieved within just one generation is stunning; but there are limits or constraints, human and otherwise, to how far, how fast, one may go. This is one of those limits. or constraints. And another is the ability of the Chinese economy to absorb capital and investments without tearing the country apart between those on the farm, effectively still in the 18 Century, and many of those in the cities, who are right on the cutting-edge - not to mention those menial labourers and construction and factory workers caught in between.
 

Norfolk

Junior Member
VIP Professional
"
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
", by James Varley, Modern Power System, April 7, 2008 (via LexisNexis News):

Successful 168h trial runs have been carried out on Yuhuan 3 and 4, marking the entry into commercial operation of this key facility and the start of a new phase for power plant technology in China.

December 2007 saw the completion of what may well turn out to be a milestone project for China's power generation industry: Huaneng Power International's 4x1000 MWe ultrasupercritical coal fired plant at Yuhuan, in Zhejiang province, on China's booming east coast (about 500 km south of Shanghai).

With main steam conditions of 26.25 MPa/600 deg C/600 deg C and an overall design efficiency of 45.16% - but with equipment having a local (ie Chinese) content of about 85% - Yuhuan can be seen as symbolic of China's emerging leadership role in power generation technology, leapfrogging a country like the UK, for example, where all the operating coal-fired stations are ageing subcritical plants.

The efficiency of Yuhuan - the first operating ultrasupercritical plant in China - is 4 percentage points above a "conventional" 600 MWe supercritical unit and around 6 percentage points better than a Chinese 600 MWe subcritical unit.

Much more at the link. This is a fairly long article. If this becomes a common power-generation system, the benfits for the Chinese economy could be substantial - and it might lessen considerably some of China's dependence upon petroleum whilst making the most of China's abundant coal reserves.

"
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
", by Tiger Tong, The Business Times, Tuesday, April 8, 2008 (via LexisNexis News):

CHINA is losing its competitive edge in some of the very industries that started the country's industrialisation process. For instance, its garment and accessories exports grew by only 5.7 per cent in the first two months of 2008, compared with a 20.9 per cent increase last year. And Guangdong, the country's biggest garment export province, witnessed an 11.3 per cent decline in exports over the same period.

Garments are not the only traditional product losing export momentum. In the first two months of 2008, the exports of toys dipped 3.6 per cent, compared with a 20.3 per cent jump in 2007. In part, the worst blizzards in half a century contributed to the deceleration or even fall of these exports. But the primary reason for the decline is that Chinese exporters have reached a point where they barely make money because of rising labour and raw-material costs.

Though low labour cost makes China-made goods in the United States cheaper than Mexican products even after taking the shipping cost into consideration, the price advantage has been eroded steadily. According to data released by the National Statistics Bureau, the average salary in urban China in 2007 reached 24,932 yuan ($4S,920), 18.7 per cent higher than in 2006.

More at the link. These are symptoms of Chian transitioning into a value-added product manufacturing economy, coupled to a weakening dollar of course. However, China's economy is also transitioning into other areas:

"
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
", by Don Lee, Los Angeles Times, Tuesday,

April 8, 2008 (via LexisNexis News):

In the foothills of Yuelu Mountain here, a young Mao Tse-tung found inspiration in nature for his political aspirations. Today, Communist Party officials have a different vision for this area: a valley of global outsourcing firms.

One of them, Beijing-based Chinasoft International Ltd., is recruiting hundreds of workers to process medical bills and health insurance claims. Its target customers: U.S. doctors.

Chinasoft is launching the venture with a Tennessee firm, Premier BPO Inc., which has similar operations in India and Pakistan. Chen Yuhong, Chinasoft's managing director, thinks it's only a matter of time before China makes big gains against India -- which now leads the world in information technology outsourcing.

"They're seriously concerned about our challenge," said Chen, 44, who has a doctorate in engineering from Beijing Institute of Technology and speaks fluent English.

More at the link. And here's a news blurb on a potential oil-tax rebate:

"
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
", Lloyd's List, Wednesday, 9 April, 2008 (via LexisNexis News):

Official and analyst sources said on Monday that under the tax scheme proposed by oil firms and endorsed by the state council last month, Beijing is expected to grant a three-quarters rebate of the 17% value-added tax on crude imports.

A little more at the link.

"
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
", by Michael Pettis, China Financial Markets, 2008-04-06:

In a system in which most countries of the world are tied together by trade and capital flow links, a savings glut of course does not mean that there has been a net increase in global savings. It means that excess savings in one part of the system will automatically lead another part of the system into excess consumption so as to keep the overall system in balance. With its very flexible financial system, its deep pockets, and the high credibility of its financial markets (not to mention the eagerness of many of its citizens to increase consumption), it is no surprise that the US economy and financial system have been the great equilibrator, running the significant trade deficits over the past several years needed to match the mercantilist and commodity-export-related surpluses of those countries with surplus savings.

More at the link. Compare that to the hoped-for events being described by Pettis in today's post:

"
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
", by Michael Pettis, China Financial Markets, 2008-04-08:

According to today’s South China Morning Post, “The news will be welcomed by fund managers in New York waiting for the so-called ‘Great Wall of Chinese liquidity’ to hit US shores.” Several other newspaper accounts also referred to this great wall of liquidity that should wash into the US markets.

More at the link. If the US is hoping (expecting) Chinese investment to keep propping up its consumption in spite of its credit and debt woes, it will come as quite a shock if the Chinese response proves less than enthusiastic.
 

Hendrik_2000

Lieutenant General
More at the link. Compare that to the hoped-for events being described by Pettis in today's post:

"
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
", by Michael Pettis, China Financial Markets, 2008-04-08:



More at the link. If the US is hoping (expecting) Chinese investment to keep propping up its consumption in spite of its credit and debt woes, it will come as quite a shock if the Chinese response proves less than enthusiastic.

Well seems that the prayer has been answered

This is also a good way to mop up liquidity couples with promoting overseas travel.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


HONG KONG (MarketWatch) -- China banking and securities regulators signed an agreement with their U.S. counterparts Monday that will help to lay the groundwork to enable Chinese investors to buy and sell U.S. stocks and mutual funds.
The agreement signed between the Securities and Exchange Commission and the China Banking Regulatory Commission marks a further expansion of QDII -- the qualified domestic institutional investor program -- and brings the U.S. in line with similar agreements signed between Beijing and regulators in Singapore, Hong Kong, Japan and the U.K.
According to data from the U.S. Treasury Department from last June, China held $922 billion in U.S. securities -- but only $29 billion of that in U.S. stocks. Most of the rest is held in U.S. government bonds.

What we've seen over the last six to 12 months, China has a lot of capital and is looking for ways to make that capital work harder and more efficiently," said Charlie Awdry, a fund manager for Gartmore's China Opportunities Fund. "This is illustrative of the broader engagement between China and the rest of the world."

What make China so formidable competitor is the flexibility of the job market and capital No cuddling and overprotection here no labor law and deduction that add up the cost. Here is an interesting article from Financial Times In next 10 years China will move 300 million people from Farm to the City and How are they going to earn their living? For once China service industry is so underdeveloped

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


When Luyuan arrived in Shenzhen to work two years earlier, she and her friends took the baton in a relay race that began in 18th-century Britain with the industrial revolution. They had edged out the women of Mexico’s maquiladoras and Hong Kong’s housing estates: they were the most affordable and productive workers the world had found, their value to the global supply chain evident in the tens of billions of dollars of foreign investment pouring into China every year. But between interviews, Luyuan was also looking for vacancies in retail. Toy and clothing stores had turned her down on the spot because of her lack of experience. As Meng explained: “The places that have good working conditions have pretty tough requirements.”

It wasn’t just market forces – higher prices for labour, electricity and land – that were forcing low-end jobs out of the city. The government was doing its part to make sure they left. Just as Luyuan dreamed of climbing out of labour-intensive manufacturing, so too did government officials in Shenzhen – a fishing village in 1980 and the world’s fourth-largest port today – and other cities of the Pearl River Delta. These factory towns were trying to refashion themselves into high-tech, low-pollution, value-added modern metropolises. Along the way, they were pushing out the kinds of jobs on which Luyuan and her friends still depended – and for which they were qualified.
 
Last edited:

Norfolk

Junior Member
VIP Professional
"
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
", The International Herald Tribune, Thursday, April 10, 2008 (via LexisNexis News):

China Communications Construction, the top infrastructure builder in the country, aims to increase its profit margins in 2008 by beefing up higher-yield contracts and investment projects and implementing tougher cost controls.

The company, which is involved in infrastructure construction and design, dredging and port machinery business, reported a 55 percent rise in second-half earnings, beating forecasts.

But its stock fell nearly 6 percent, to close Wednesday at 17.42 Hong Kong dollars, or $2.23, as investors cashed in profits after the shares rose 16 percent in the three weeks before Tuesday.

The company's gross profit margin improved slightly, to 10.34 percent last year from 10.29 percent in 2006, the chairman, Zhou Jichang, said at a news conference.

More at the link. Someday these guys may become Bechtels' competitors - at least KBR's; not today, not even tomorrow, but not so far off in the future perhaps.

"
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
", The International Herald Tribune, Thursday, April 10, 2008 (via LexisNexis News):

China's foreign debt jumped by $27.9 billion in the fourth quarter of 2007 to reach $373.62 billion at the end of the year, with short-term debt, an indicator of speculative investments, making up much of that increase.

A little more at the link. Hot money at work it would seem.

"
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
", The Economist, U.S. Edition, April 12, 2008 (via LexisNexis News):

WESTERN firms are always complaining about the theft of intellectual property in China. From knock-off designs to copycat brand names, pirated music and fake drugs, China has a well-earned reputation as a free-for-all when it comes to patents and copyrights. Worse, there often seems little hope of redress: the courts are too distant and too incompetent; the laws are too weak or too vague; the culture is too resistant to the very idea of intellectual property. Yet help is at hand, in the form of Chinese firms with patents to defend.

Since 2003 the number of trademark applications has grown by 60%; the number of patents has nearly doubled (850,000 are now active) and the number of lawsuits about intellectual property has more than doubled (see chart). The government is encouraging the trend in many ways, including signalling to the press to cheer it on.

More at the link. Yep, when patents come under threat, they break out the big legal guns. Now that intellectual property violations threaten domestic concerns, and not just foreign concerns, the Wild West days of piracy and fraud are, while not at an end, are now facing perhaps the beginning of the end. Whether foreign concerns will find their own claims dealt with in the future as efficiently as domestic concerns will remain to be seen.

"
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
", South China Morning Post, Thursday, April 10, 2008 (via LexisNexis News):

Turnover rose 29.9 per cent to 36.82 billion yuan based on mainland accounting standards, on the back of a 27 per cent growth in coal volumes to 85.16 million tonnes.

Raw coal output rose 14.5 per cent to 90.52 million tonnes. Marketable coal output was 69.32 million tonnes, up 27 per cent from 2006.

Marketable coal sourced from third parties tumbled 49.4 per cent to 15.84 million tonnes.

The average selling price of power-station coal rose 13.7 per cent to 339 yuan per tonne, and that of export coal, 21.5 per cent to 479 yuan.

Coking coal, used in steel smelting, averaged 668 yuan a tonne, up 18.4 per cent, as its export price fell 8.5 per cent to 775 yuan.

Output of coke climbed 72.1 per cent to 2.84 million tonnes, while that of coal production equipment rose 24.4 per cent to 202,000 tonnes.

More at the link. Coal is the linchpin of China's industrialization, and as the domestic demand for coal rises (and as domestic coal production replaces foreign coal imports), the price of coal naturally rises. So the price rises have not been exhorbitant, and unlike petroleum, are rather less subject to speculation and geopolitical events.

"
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
", by Victor Cheung, The Standard, Friday, April 11, 2008:

China Merchants Bank (3968) expects its first-quarter earnings this year to surge 140 percent on growth in loans and fee income.

The profit guidance of the mainland's sixth-largest lender by assets came after one for Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (1398), the country's largest, whose first-quarter profit is poised to grow 50 percent.

"It is a positive signal ... showing operating environment is better than expected - for example credit tightening is not as severe as thought," Kim Eng Securities analyst Ivan Li said.

More at the link. Interesting that the banks are still going great guns, despite inflation at home and all the international financial turbulence lately.
 

Norfolk

Junior Member
VIP Professional
"
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
", by Maria Chan, South China Morning Post, Friday, 11 April, 2008 (via LexisNexis News):

The yuan yesterday broke through seven to the US dollar for the first time since its revaluation in July 2005.

While all Asian currencies bar the South Korean won gained yesterday, the focus was on the yuan's historic breakthrough. It was also helped by a surge in the Singapore dollar.

Analysts expect the yuan's value to rise as much as 15 per cent this year as the central government seeks to rein in inflation.

More at the link. Michael Pettis described this on his
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
as a "non-event", as more symbolic than substantive. Nevertheless, events like this still leave a psychological impact, though if anything, the substantive impact may be to lessen the pressure on the Government to raise interest rates in order to restrain inflationary pressures. This may result in some short-term pain, of course. Check out The Standard's take:

"
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
", by Katherine Ng and Gita Dhungana, The Standard, Friday, April 11, 2008:

The yuan yesterday surged beyond 7.00 to the US dollar for the first time in 15 years, showing China, like other Asian countries, is increasingly using the exchange rate as a major policy tool to curb inflation and its trade surplus.

"As long as the US dollar remains weak, the Chinese government will let the yuan rise in line with other Asian currencies to curb inflation and tackle the trade surplus," said Chris Leung, an economist at DBS Bank. "It's a more effective tool to combat inflation than an interest rate hike."

The People's Bank of China set its reference rate for the yuan at 6.9920 versus the dollar.

More at the link.

"
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
", People's Bank of China, 1 April, 2008:

The Monetary Policy Committee of the People's Bank of China (PBC) held its first quarterly meeting of 2008 in Beijing days ago.

It was noted that at present China's economy maintained a steady and rapid development momentum, but problems such as a potential rebound of fixed asset investment, excess money and credit supply and excessive liquidity were not adequately addressed, accompanied by a palpable pressure of price hike. In the international market, the US sub-prime mortgage crisis worsened, and uncertainties and risks increased. Following the guidance of the Communist Party of China's Central Committee and the State Council, the PBC strengthened financial macro control to preserve balances at aggregate level. The economic and financial performance has broadly remained in sound situation.


More at the link. Official recognition that "hot money", and not only seasonal (both natural and man-made) as well as agricultural factors, are involved in driving inflation. The following story goes along with this one, more or less:

"
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
", People's Bank of China, 30 March, 2008.

"
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
", by Michael Pettis, China Financial Markets, 11 April, 2008:

The PBoC announced that total reserves as of the end of March were $1.68 trillion, for total growth of $153.9 billion during the first quarter (compared to $94.6 billion in the last quarter of 2007). I think this is a record quarter, and there is a strong case to be made that the total amount would be about $22 billion higher except that commercial banks may have been asked to redenominate into dollars part of their January increase in minimum reserves – which has no impact on the money supply but does lower headline reserves.

More at the link. China's Forex reserves are accumulating at an increasing and an unprecedented pace - and in spite of a softening in exports. Admittedly, places like NA and the EU aren't the greatest places to invest in right now, and all that capital is looking for other places to park; but still, this is stunning.
 

Hendrik_2000

Lieutenant General
With all the problem, China march into the rank of first world economy continue unabatted. Instead of fear mongering and talk of "containing and destabilizing" The world better start to see the real China and participate in her economic growth

China ranks No. 2 in buying power, World Bank saysReuters,

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Friday April 11 2008 WASHINGTON, April 11 (Reuters) - China ranks as the world's second-largest economy and India is fourth, according to new World Bank data on Friday, which uses new measurements of countries buying power in U.S. dollars.
China remained in the No. 2 spot despite a downward revision by the World Bank in its purchasing power parity estimates.
The bank's new 2008 World Development Indicators showed that developing countries now produce 41 percent of the world's output, up from 36 percent in 2000. Combined, output of the world's economies reached $59 trillion in 2006.
This year's data introduces new estimates of purchasing power parity based on price data on goods and services in 146 countries, and adjusted to reflect local costs and affordability and converted to dollars.
The data replaces benchmark estimates, many of them from 1993 and as far back as the 1980s, and allows more accurate comparisons of market size, the structure of economies and what money can buy. It is the first time that China fully participated.
According to the bank's rankings, five of the 12 largest economies are in the developing world.
The United States remained in first place with $13.2 trillion of global output. China followed at $6.1 trillion. Japan was measured at $4.2 trillion, India at $2.7 trillion, Germany at $2.7 trillion, Britain at $2.0 trillion, France at $1.9 trillion, Russia at $1.6 trillion, Italy at $1.7 trillion, Brazil at $1.6 trillion, and then Mexico and Spain, both at $1.2 trillion.
China remained in second place despite a revision in December of its purchasing power parity that showed India and China's economies were 40 percent smaller than previously thought.
The revision put China's share of the global economy in PPP terms at 9.7 percent, down from a previous estimate of 14 percent. India's share dropped to 4.3 percent from a previous estimate of 6 percent.
"There are a lot of implications. One of them is it helps us to see that the domestic market in China is really much larger than people might have thought when they were looking at the exchange rate data," said Eric Swanson, program manager for the World Bank's development data group.
"China will continue to have a vast domestic market that produces for it but it also suggests to other participants in the world economy that China is not just a producer of goods but also a vast potential market
," he said. (Reporting by Lesley Wroughton; editing by Tim Ahmann)
 

Norfolk

Junior Member
VIP Professional
"
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
", by Daniel Ren, South China Morning Post, Tuesday, 15 April, 2008 (via LexisNexis News):

Hot money flows into the mainland tripled to $80US billion in the first quarter, potentially playing havoc with China's property and capital markets, the deputy chief of the economic forecasting department at the State Information Centre warns.

"The massive amount [of hot money] is not hype but a scientific conclusion," Zhu Baoliang of the mainland government's major think-tank said yesterday.

"To be frank, we had no clue of how the money flowed into our country."

China's trade surplus in the first quarter reached $41US.4 billion and the country drew foreign direct investment of $27US.4 billion during the period.

More at the link. This statment by an analyst from the SIC reinforces what the PBOC itself stated at the beginning of this month, that inflation is driven in considerable part by easy credit and an excessive inflow of capital. Needless to say, the source of much of the capital influx is from well beyond China's shores, as international investors seek to put their money where it is most likely to make more. Or at least more likely to be "safe". However, foreign speculation may end up causing considerable harm to the domestic economy.

Speaking of foreign investment, check these out:

"
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
", The International Herald Tribune, Tuesday, April 15, 2008 (via LexisNexis News), and:

"
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
", The International Herald Tribune, Tuesday, April 15, 2008 (via LexisNexis News).

"
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
", by Nesa Subrahmaniyan, Shanghai Daily.com, Wednesday, 16 April, 2008:

CHINA bought a stake in BP Plc, its second investment in an European oil company, as the nation seeks to secure resources and boost returns on the world's largest foreign-exchange reserves.

BP, Britain's largest company by market value, is aware a Chinese sovereign fund bought shares and welcomes the investment, spokesman David Nicholas said yesterday. The fund purchased just less than 1 percent of BP, worth about 1 billion pounds (US$1.97 billion), the Daily Telegraph reported.

More at the link. While this is reportedly causing some unease in London and perhaps Paris as well, 1% is, after all, just 1%.

"
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
", by Michael Pettis, China Financial Markets, 2008-04-14:

Meanwhile Liu Shiyu, the deputy governor of the People's Bank of China, said in Shanghai over the weekend something that I guess we already knew: CPI inflation for March, although not to be formally released until Thursday, is going to come in at 8.3%. This means that annualized inflation for the first quarter of the year is 13%.

I think this is just the beginning of a longer inflationary period in which declining food prices will be matched by rising non-food prices, as explained in my April 4 entry, but to be fair there are still a lot of economists, and still a majority, who disagree. For example according to Shen Minggao, an economist at Citibank: “Consumer inflation probably stayed high in March on costly food while non-food prices picked up pace. We continue to believe that the estimated 8 percent CPI rate in the first quarter will mark the peak of inflation this year.” We’ll see. A lot of bank economists are arguing that March, or perhaps April, will mark the inflationary peak, but I have to say I am very, very skeptical. This is going to continue much longer, especially as hot money inflows have gotten much worse.

More at the link. As per expectations, Michael Pettis not only remains unconvinced that inflation has peaked in the Chinese economy, but is poised to in fact worsen, perhaps even substantially. His usual suspect, "hot money", is more and more attrracting the formal attentions of Chinese officialdom, so he's probably (and uncomfortably), close to the mark on the risks that speculation poses to the economy. He's looking forward to the PBOC's official inflation figures for March, due to be released on Thursday.
 
Top