I guess I was thinking of a submunitions based design. It *might* be more volumetrically efficient if you’re going for multiple shots to guarantee a kill. But yeah…It's in km, to cover that you would need nukes![]()
I guess I was thinking of a submunitions based design. It *might* be more volumetrically efficient if you’re going for multiple shots to guarantee a kill. But yeah…It's in km, to cover that you would need nukes![]()
Post the paper then...I bet others have thought of this before, or it may have even been achieved before . But this paper to get a deviation angle of less than 0.01 degrees and a deviation distance of less than 0.1 meters is an absolutely insane algorithm.
You can use Google search to identify the picture; you should be able to find it.Post the paper then...
Oh hey ain't this the one I posted on Twitter (ignore the caption)?High-performance UAVs guide 500 kilometer range long-range air-to-air missiles, calculate and predict enemy aircraft flight trajectories, and divide the predicted hit zone convex hull into missile-coordinated attack sub-regions to cover the enemy aircraft terminal envelope.
Simple launch-guide-relaunch is outdated; enemy needs to face a missile swarm/kill cloud.
Or, to use a more old-fashioned example as analogie, PzH-2000 was often marketed for its ability to achieve simultaneous impact of three shells through ballistic trajectory planning.
Now, it's about three long-range missiles, can hit the same point simultaneously, or in wave, or spread out to cover the area where enemy aircraft may maneuver, to ensure at least one hits.
View attachment 169723
View attachment 169727




Who said this is merely the YJ-19 adapted to be air-launched? For all we know this could be something akin to the CJ-1000 which can target aerial assets.But this is the YJ-19 which is a anti-ship and anti-surface missile not an air to air missile. Why is this in this thread?
Mach 4 launch would not be from J-36 or J-XD. More likely from JH-xx.