Does this reveal mean that a successor of the PL-17 is ready?
Does this reveal mean that a successor of the PL-17 is ready?
Does this reveal mean that a successor of the PL-17 is ready?
Probably. I see it as just a general patent on how rear fins can be folded and can be applied on different AAMs.
As for PL-16 being a mini-PL-17... Afaik that's not true, but we'll see.
I don't know.How recent was this taken and where?
This is a dangerous misconception - like, first, any pilot can turn away if warned; this isn't skill.
The failure on Indian side was clearly (criminal) failure of ROE and anticipation of threat radius, or perhaps outright political pressure.
Which is all more weird, b/c PL-15 performed exactly as per known dual pulse papers, which i believe @siegecrossbow brought here many(7? don't remember) years ago.
Where Indians failed technically is failure to identify launch maneuvers as genuine. Which is also political/peacetime failure.
View attachment 78904
Here is an interesting document that my answer why PL-15E has a max range of 145KM as opposed to PL-15's speculated range of around 180KM. The table lists the maximum range of AAM depending on the duration of time that elapses between the two pulses of a dual-pulse rocket motor. Under the head-on condition, the maximum range occurs when there is a 30 second gap between firing. If the gap between firing is 0s, the head-on maximum range is -- SURPRISE -- 145KM. What do you call a dual-pulse rocket motor with no pause between firing? A plain old single-pulse rocket motor.
This pretty much confirmed my suspicion that PL-15E does not feature dual-pulse rocket motor.
I am leaning toward the former since PL-15 is highly proven for 10+ years, combat tested and more reliable. But even if the PL-16 were to be based on PL-15, folks should expect generational improvements in fuel, weight, range, manoeuvrability and sensor fusion.Is the PL-16 simply a folding-fin variant of the PL-15, or is it expected to have a longer range compared to the PL-15?