Chinese air to air missiles

Blitzo

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
If you recall those didn’t have fins at all and were likely weighted models for weaponsbay tests (release at high speed/altitude).

Ehhh...

tQokAHl.jpeg



vBQGBAr.jpeg


pwLT0Up.jpeg
 

siegecrossbow

Field Marshall
Staff member
Super Moderator

I stand corrected.

Case to notice, but China didn't really hide PL-17. Which is undoubtedly new gen missile and one hell of a "game changer"
No PLAAF asset can get hide something this big internally till J-36 enters service. Even then, remember when this photo was first released by the official PLA

1771324833139.jpeg

They very quickly deleted it from the site after realizing that something slipped past the censors by accident.

And as with PL-15 until very recently we have not seen a video of the missile getting fired. This implies that they don’t want opponents to extrapolate parameters and possibly propellant used through video.
 

ougoah

Brigadier
Registered Member
You're all missing the main point. PL-15 and PL-17 do not diverge from conventional air to air missile configurations. Okay PL-17 is very unique with no canards for a long range AAM. But now we know PL-16 is supposed to be thinner than PL-15 and offer greater range on the purely physical parameters. In the mid to late 2010s when PL-15 and PL-17 were revealed, we had little real indication of range and performance parameters. We have a much better idea of their range and performance parameters now.

The latest hints/confirmations for these missiles that were not known until 2020+
  • PL-15 has between 200km and 300km range (depending on so many factors obviously)
  • PL-15 uses AESA seeker
  • PL-17 is hinted to be 700km max range against large, slow targets and 400km against fighters
  • PL-17 is designed to also target fighters
That's 5 - 10 years of them not knowing and not being able to put the physical look with the performance.

Now their size and observable characteristics can be considered together to interpolate other information that potentially can be used to counter them. There's no good reason to reveal the design and shape of your AAMs because these things are pretty much going to be operating on such universally converging designs and technological limits. It reveals too much about your unknown factors such as energy density of fuel and the performance of your rocket motors.

PL-16 and PL-17's successor or rather, any other AAM will/should probably be kept hidden until their successors have passed trials and close to reaching service. Especially if the performance parameters have been leaked ie PL-16 has greater operational windows (range and other attributes) than PL-15 while being thinner. They can put 2 and 2 together and interpolate too much from its physical characteristics that can be exposed by photos.

Missiles are top secret. China plays by this golden rule. Revealing stuff that is "safe" enough to reveal if it's a novel and strategically important missile but revealed for various reasons (part of which is deterrence) and revealing stuff that have become superseded. Missiles like YJ-17 and YJ-19 fall into the former category. Missiles like DF-17 and JL-1 fall into the latter category (DF-27, CJ-1000 etc presenting as superiors).
 

tphuang

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
Captive tests don't equal to missile. It's hard to pinpoint dates in Chinese weapon development, but it's very much possible to track dates at which US crush counters are aimed. PL-17 is in all likelihood NET 2020s capability.
that's not what the guancha folks said. Which they always indicated it was like a 2010s in service kind of thing.
 
Top