China's Westward One Belt One Road Strategy

delft

Brigadier
Very Simple:

US need to revisit their own policies & start investing on ground for the betterment of humanity & win the hearts & trust of the people rather than investing on dummy (corrupt) leaders to fulfill the goals...
And they should begin in their own country, but ....! They tried. After the war against Vietnam the Vertol plant tried to produce tram cars for IIRC Boston to replace the loss of orders for helicopters. However there is a large distance between both products and by saving money the wrong way the new cars were less reliable than the antiques they were meant to replace. The conclusion from the seventies was that retooling US industry to civilian production was wrong. US infrastructure had been neglected since the Vietnam war and the deficit was not corrected in the '90's. Instead more and more expensive wars followed. Rail and roads, locks and dams, bridges and sewage systems has been neglected for a long time to pay for military expenditures. The situation with the Washington DC metro rail is so bad that there was even a proposal to close the whole system down for more than a year to allow for maintenance.
Improvement are being made. Foreign companies including a Chinese one are now building passenger rail cars in US but an immense amount is still to be done. So how would US be able to help develop other countries even halfway comparable to what China is doing?
 

timepass

Brigadier
Instead more and more expensive wars followed. Rail and roads, locks and dams, bridges and sewage systems has been neglected for a long time to pay for military expenditures.

This is the core issue.... reason wrong policies/dirty politics brings back to the American nation & haunting... destabilize the world ..... etc etc
 

timepass

Brigadier
Belt & Road

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
and
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
are building the Moscow -
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
high speed train. The 770-km railway is the highest standard high speed railway in the world. The railway from
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
in China to
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
in Spain was completed in November 2014, passing through 7 countries for 13000 km. In this episode, we will see how
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
helps close the distance between people around the world.

 

timepass

Brigadier
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


China pledges $124 billion for new Silk Road as champion of globalization


By
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
and
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
| BEIJING

Chinese President Xi Jinping pledged $124 billion on Sunday for his new Silk Road plan to forge a path of peace, inclusiveness and free trade, and called for the abandonment of old models based on rivalry and diplomatic power games.

Xi used a summit on the initiative, attended by leaders and top officials from around the world, to bolster China's global leadership ambitions as U.S. President Donald Trump promotes "America First" and questions existing global free trade deals.

"We should build an open platform of cooperation and uphold and grow an open world economy," Xi told the opening of the two-day gathering in Beijing.

China has touted what it formally calls the Belt and Road initiative as a new way to boost global development since Xi unveiled the plan in 2013, aiming to expand links between Asia, Africa, Europe and beyond underpinned by billions of dollars in infrastructure investment.

Xi said the world must create conditions that promote open development and encourage the building of systems of "fair, reasonable and transparent global trade and investment rules".

Hours before the summit opened, North Korea launched another ballistic missile, further testing the patience of China, its chief ally. The United States had complained to China on Friday over the inclusion of a North Korean delegation at the event.



MASSIVE FUNDING BOOST

Xi pledged a major funding boost to the new Silk Road, including an extra 100 billion yuan ($14.50 billion) into the existing Silk Road Fund, 380 billion yuan in loans from two policy banks and 60 billion yuan in aid to developing countries and international bodies in countries along the new trade routes.

In addition, Xi said China would encourage financial institutions to expand their overseas yuan fund businesses to the tune of 300 billion yuan.

Xi did not give a time frame for the new loans, aid and funding pledged on Sunday.

Leaders from 29 countries attended the forum, as well as the heads of the United Nations, International Monetary Fund and World Bank.

Britain's finance minister told the summit his country was a "natural partner" in the new Silk Road, while the prime minister of Pakistan, Nawaz Sharif, a close Chinese ally, praised China's "vision and ingenuity".

"Such a broad sweep and scale of interlocking economic partnerships and investments is unprecedented in history," Sharif said.

White House adviser Matt Pottinger said the United States welcomed efforts by China to promote infrastructure connectivity as part of its Belt and Road initiative, and U.S. companies could offer top value services.

India refused to send an official delegation to Beijing, reflecting displeasure with China for developing a $57 billion trade corridor through Pakistan that also crosses the disputed territory of Kashmir.

"No country can accept a project that ignores its core concerns on sovereignty and territorial integrity," said Indian foreign ministry spokesman Gopal Baglay, adding that there were concerns about host countries taking on "unsustainable debt."

China plans to import $2 trillion of products from countries participating in its Belt and Road initiative over the next five years, Commerce Minister Zhong Shan said.



UNEASE OVER SUMMIT

But some Western diplomats have expressed unease about both the summit and the plan as a whole, seeing it as an attempt to promote Chinese influence globally. They are also concerned about transparency and access for foreign firms to the scheme.

Australian Trade Minister Steven Ciobo said Canberra was receptive to exploring commercial opportunities China's new Silk Road presented, but any decisions would remain incumbent on national interest.

"China is willing to share its development experience with all countries," Xi said. "We will not interfere in other countries' internal affairs. We will not export our system of society and development model, and even more will not impose our views on others."

"In advancing the Belt and Road, we will not re-tread the old path of games between foes. Instead we will create a new model of cooperation and mutual benefit," Xi said.

North Korea, which considers China its sole major diplomatic ally and economic benefactor, raised eyebrows when it decided to send a delegation to the summit.

The North Korean delegation largely kept a low profile at the summit, and there was no evidence that its presence had affected participation despite U.S. misgivings.



FINANCIAL INCLUSIVENESS

Xi said the new Silk Road would be open to all, including Africa and the Americas, which are not situated on the traditional Silk Road.

"No matter if they are from Asia and Europe, or Africa or the Americas, they are all cooperative partners in building the Belt and Road."

The idea of cooperation and inclusiveness extends to funding projects and investments along the new trade routes, which are being developed both on land and at sea.

"We need joint effort among Belt and Road countries to boost financing cooperation," Zhou Xiaochuan, governor of China's central bank, said.

To sustain the projects, Belt and Road nations should allow companies to play a key role, as government resources are limited, Zhou said.

The active use of local currencies will also help to mobilize local savings, lower remittance and exchange costs, and safeguard financial stability, he said.

At the forum, finance ministries from 27 countries, including China, approved a set of principles that will guide project financing along the new Silk Road.

Germany, which was not among the countries that approved the financing guidelines, said its firms were willing to support the Belt and Road initiative, but more transparency was needed.

Some of China's close allies and partners were at the forum, including Russian President Vladimir Putin, Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Sen and Kazakh President Nursultan Nazarbayev.

There were also several European leaders attending, including the prime ministers of Spain, Italy, Greece and Hungary.

Chinese state-run media has spared no effort in its coverage of the summit, including broadcasting an awkwardly-named English-language music video "The Belt and Road is How" sung by children from countries on the new Silk Road.

($1 = 6.8972 Chinese yuan)


(Additional reporting by Elias Glenn, Kevin Yao, Thomas Peter, Michael Martina and Sue-Lin Wong; Writing by Ben Blanchard and Ryan Woo; Editing by Randy Fabi and Jane Merriman)
 

timepass

Brigadier
CPEC open for all; must not be politicized, Pakistan tells India

l_204401_114246_updates.jpg


BEIJING: Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif on Sunday said the China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) under the One Belt, One Road (OBOR) initiative, was open to all countries in the region and categorically said the project “must not be politicized.”

“Let me make it very clear that CPEC is an economic undertaking open to all countries in the region. It has no geographical boundaries. It must not be politicized,” the Prime Minister said in his address at the plenary session of High-level Dialogue on Belt and Road Forum (BRF), themed “Cooperation for Common Prosperity,” being held in China’s capital.

India has boycotted the global event citing reservations on the CPEC route passing through Gilgit-Baltistan, India claimed to be a disputed territory. The Prime Minister’s statement is apparently a response to Indian concerns and opposition.

The Prime Minister called for building a peaceful, connected and caring neighbourhood by shunning mutual differences.

“It is time we transcend our differences, resolve conflicts through dialogue and diplomacy, and leave a legacy of peace for future generations,” he said at the BRF platform, with 29 heads of states and governments and 1,500 delegates in attendance.

The Prime Minister said peace and development go hand in hand, and nothing can pave the path for peace and security more than economic development achieved through regional collaboration.

“The OBOR signifies that geo-economics must take precedence over geo-politics, and that the centre of gravity should shift from conflict to cooperation,” he said.

The Prime Minister said OBOR could be regarded as a “powerful tool for overcoming terrorism and extremism.”

“As OBOR is unfolding across continents, it is fostering inclusion, creating tolerance, and promoting acceptance of cultural diversity,” he said,

The Prime Minister said CPEC was a core project of OBOR and had rightly been called its flagship for aiming to connect the neighbourhoods of East and West Asia.

He said CPEC made Pakistan both a conduit and destination for cross-regional investment and trade.

Terming ‘China as Pakistan’s close friend and trusted ally’, Nawaz Sharif said his participation at the Forum was to celebrate the remarkable success of the seminal initiative of ‘One Belt, One Road (OBOR)’.

He expressed confidence that the historic event would build critical pathways in the years to come for economic and financial cooperation, business-to-business collaboration, and people-to-people contacts.

He paid President Xi and the Chinese leadership his deepest tributes for their dynamic and creative leadership and said Pakistan admired China’s vision and ingenuity in developing corridors across regions.
 

love_sick7

Just Hatched
Registered Member
Unsustainable debt.....anyone how to interpret this choice of word?


India has not sent an official delegation to attend the Belt and Road Forum in Beijing yesterday, and instead criticised China’s global initiative, warning of an “unsustainable debt burden” for countries involved.

Government officials from New Delhi did not travel, said Indian officials, although scholars from Indian think-tanks have flown to Beijing to attend some of the meetings at the forum.

Asked whether New Delhi was participating in the summit, Indian Foreign Ministry spokesman Gopal Baglay said India could not accept a project that compromised its sovereignty.

Chinese President Xi Jinping hosted dozens of world leaders and senior officials yesterday for the country’s biggest diplomatic showcase of the year, touting his vision of a new “Silk Road” that opens trade routes across the globe.

India is incensed that one of the key Belt and Road projects passes through Kashmir and Pakistan. The nuclear-armed rivals have fought two of their three wars over the disputed region.

“No country can accept a project that ignores its core concerns on sovereignty and territorial integrity,” said Mr Baglay.

He also warned of the danger of debt. One of the criticisms of the Silk Road plan is that host countries may struggle to pay back loans for huge infrastructure projects being carried out and funded by Chinese companies and banks.

“Connectivity initiatives must follow principles of financial responsibility to avoid projects that would create unsustainable debt burden for communities,” said Mr Baglay.

New Delhi’s criticism of the Belt and Road initiative came as Mr Xi pledged US$124 billion (S$173 billion) to the plan, and called for the abandonment of old models based on rivalry and diplomatic power games.

Leaders from 29 countries and ministerial delegates from many more are attending the forum in Beijing, including India’s smaller neighbours — not just Pakistan, but also Sri Lanka and Nepal.

Mr Baglay said India supported greater connectivity across the region and listed the initiatives it was involved in, including highway projects and the North-South corridor in Central Asia, but he said these had to be developed in a transparent manner. “We are of firm belief that connectivity initiatives must be based on universally recognised international norms, good governance, rule of law, openness, transparency and equality,” he said in a statement.

As well as the corridor through Pakistan, India is worried more broadly about China’s economic and diplomatic expansion through Asia, and in particular across countries and waterways it considers to be within its sphere of influence. REUTERS
 

taxiya

Brigadier
Registered Member
Long-distance land transportation is expensive, which is why we rarely see the development of big inland cities/populations without access to a river or ocean.

It's just more cost-effective and efficient to locate industries/factories in places which do have access to waterborne transport.

I don't disagree that inland areas do need transportation commensurate with their needs, but we can see Western China and Central Asia are dry and sparsely populated areas.

That sparse population and long distance also means central asia can't really function as Mackinder's pivot.

Look at how European Russia has struggled to influence China/India/MiddleEast (which are power centres in their own right), precisely because its centre of economic/industrial power is so far away.

If China were to control the pivot area (sparsely populated Siberia+Central Asia), it would have the same problem trying to influence European Russia which is just so far away from core China.

And Siberia+Central Asia will remain sparsely populated because of the climate plus the lack of fresh water.

---

Yes, US hegemony has frequently veered towards hard power, but one should hope that China does a better job in the future.

---

Yes, years ago, China benefited from having access to a liberal trade order, when trade was even more important to China's development, whilst keeping its own economy relatively closed.

But now China arguably would benefit more from a liberal investment order for its multi-nationals to expand.
You have made many insightful points.

But it seems that you are implying that land based trading is less effective and less prevalence than sea based.

To this I disagree. You forget to count the long history before the European marine time expansion.
Central Asia has been very prosperous with big cities and civilizations relying on land based trade "the silk road" for more than 1000 years.
Few counter examples here:
  1. The Persian empire.
  2. The land empire built by Alexander the great in central Asia.
  3. The Han and Tang dynasties' far penetrations into this area.
  4. Pax Mongolica which made trade safe all the way from east coast of China to eastern Europe.
 

solarz

Brigadier
You have made many insightful points.

But it seems that you are implying that land based trading is less effective and less prevalence than sea based.

To this I disagree. You forget to count the long history before the European marine time expansion.
Central Asia has been very prosperous with big cities and civilizations relying on land based trade "the silk road" for more than 1000 years.
Few counter examples here:
  1. The Persian empire.
  2. The land empire built by Alexander the great in central Asia.
  3. The Han and Tang dynasties' far penetrations into this area.
  4. Pax Mongolica which made trade safe all the way from east coast of China to eastern Europe.

Technology is always changing, what is true today may not be true tomorrow. China is currently betting on railyway technology to match, if not surpass, the efficiency of sea shipping.

Land shipping has the advantage of being able to go directly to the destination instead of being forced to dock at specific ports. Furthermore, with sea shipping being so developed today, the inland nations are a source of new, virtually untapped markets. A highly developed rail network can distribute coastal wealth to inland regions.
 
Top