China's transport, tanker & heavy lift aircraft - esp. Y-20/YY-20

by78

General
Rehearsal formations.



54511540748_770b1176a3_o.jpg

54511469844_3cc46dedc6_o.jpg

54511470484_1bdb8a5c99_k.jpg

54510412832_75a8bdfed0_o.jpg
 

ismellcopium

Junior Member
Registered Member
it's possible that YY-20A may have provisions to install more internal fuel tanks in the cargo hold than Y-20B does, as YY-20A is more dedicated as a tanker aircraft (albeit YY-20A is able to remove them as well and be a tanker).
Btw, are there any actual rumours/indications that Y-20B won't have the same removable internal cargo bay fuel tanks YY-20A has? Curious because I don't see how it'd function adequately as a tanker without them.
 

Blitzo

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
Btw, are there any actual rumours/indications that Y-20B won't have the same removable internal cargo bay fuel tanks YY-20A has? Curious because I don't see how it'd function adequately as a tanker without them.

I didn't say that Y-20B won't be able to accommodate any removable internal cargo bay fuel tanks (that is to say, I expect them to be able to accommodate them).

What I said is that it is possible Y-20A may be able to accommodate more internal fuel tanks in the cargo hold than Y-20B does
 

ismellcopium

Junior Member
Registered Member
I didn't say that Y-20B won't be able to accommodate any removable internal cargo bay fuel tanks (that is to say, I expect them to be able to accommodate them).

What I said is that it is possible Y-20A may be able to accommodate more internal fuel tanks in the cargo hold than Y-20B does
But why would that be the case, and has there been any evidence to that effect? IIRC from the YY-20A's photo we could see one tube running upward to the wings and another running straight downward and backward (through a pump mechanism) to the central drogue port. Without that central position & pump on the Y-20B if anything it seems like you should expect it to have more room for the internal tank, the cargo bay dimensions otherwise being identical.
 

Blitzo

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
But why would that be the case

Any number of reasons -- having additional cargo bay fuel tanks may require additional plumbing in the aircraft, it may require more time to load an additional tank which as a more regularly configured MRTT they may deem to be too time consuming,


has there been any evidence to that effect? IIRC from the YY-20A's photo we could see one tube running upward to the wings and another running straight downward and backward (through a pump mechanism) to the central drogue port. Without that central position & pump on the Y-20B if anything it seems like you should expect it to have more room for the internal tank, the cargo bay dimensions otherwise being identical.

I think you're reading too much into the post which you quoted from me.

I wasn't saying what I thought was likely to be the case -- I was answering a hypothetical on a hypothetical to rationalize why it may be possible that a YY-20A may still have some uses as a tanker relative to a tanker fitted Y-20B, and in #6884 I did explicitly write that of the two hypothetical reasons I listed, the more probable reason for continuing to use YY-20A alongside Y-20B was its central fuselage drogue station, and the cargo fuel capacity of YY-20A vs Y-20B was more of an unknown hypothetical.



Obviously as of present we have no idea what the internal cargo fuel tank for Y-20B situation would be as of present. It might be able to carry the same/less/more internal cargo fuel than a YY-20A. In theory they're all equally possible at this stage.
 

Deino

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
In addition, two more as yet unconfirmed YY-20A tankers were spotted for the first time: Serial number 20641 & 20649 both from the 13th Transport Division, 37th Air Regiment based at Kaifeng, CTC.

(Images by "XHS" via Huitong's CMA-Blog)

@huitong ... may I ask, who "XHS" is?

YY-20A 20641.jpgYY-20A 20649.jpg
 

ismellcopium

Junior Member
Registered Member
In addition, two more as yet unconfirmed YY-20A tankers were spotted for the first time: Serial number 20641 & 20649 both from the 13th Transport Division, 37th Air Regiment based at Kaifeng, CTC.

(Images by "XHS" via Huitong's CMA-Blog)

@huitong ... may I ask, who "XHS" is?

View attachment 152194View attachment 152195
Probably xiaohongshu.

Are there now more than 30 YY-20As confirmed to be flying, with all these new units recently?
 
Top