China's strategic vulnerabilities


ansy1968

Junior Member
Registered Member
Russia and any other soverreign nation should stay far away from the G7. The G7 is nothing more than a US vassal club. Germany saying that Russia should not be admitted can be construed many different ways. I like to believe that Germany is on the fence, treading the middle ground between the US and Russia. There is no point of Russia joining this farce again anyway. The G20 is a far better platform and represents the interests of the globe far better than the G7 US vassal club.
hi Laviduce,

Its ironic cause they are partners in the NORDS STREAM pipeline.
 

Laviduce

New Member
Registered Member
hi Laviduce,

Its ironic cause they are partners in the NORDS STREAM pipeline.
How is the G7 a partner in that project ? Out of that group of countries, the only country that is really a partner in that project is Germany. A country which the majority of the time tows the US line. They went along with their US overlords to sanction Russia for responding to the illegal US coup in Ukraine in 2014. Things like Nord Stream 2 are the exception and not the rule.
 

ansy1968

Junior Member
Registered Member
How is the G7 a partner in that project ? Out of that group of countries, the only country that is really a partner in that project is Germany. A country which the majority of the time tows the US line. They went along with their US overlords to sanction Russia for responding to the illegal US coup in Ukraine in 2014. Things like Nord Stream 2 are the exception and not the rule.
Hi "Laviduce,

Sorry for the confusion, yes its between Germany and Russia. I agreed with you 100%, within the G20 Russia had a voice and is well respected.
 

AssassinsMace

Brigadier
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

I thought the world obeys the US... They wouldn't be questioning the US if they were Kool-Aid drinkers of Jim Jones America.

Why doesn't Australia go all-in when they're playing henchman the most? Like I've been saying, this has been all a bluffing game. I'm not saying it's not serious. I'm saying the goal was believing pressure was going to make China surrender. The point of this thread was to make people believe China was surrounded and the world would turn their backs on China like China doesn't exists and they would go on believing China will wither away and die without them. They're incapable of that because US culture demands that they be in control of everything. China is one-fifth of the world population and people believe they can leave China alone...?

When you talk to Westerners about the Cold War, they think it was all about Europe. The US saw China as a bigger threat than the Soviet Union because it was the first country to kick the West out. WWII weakened the colonialist powers. That's why they were paranoid over China during the Cold War. China was an example for the world to revolt against colonialism and China was working at that. Why was one of Nelson Mandela's first foreign trips after getting out of prison was to China? It's because China was a big supporter and in giving aid to the African National Congress and to other countries around the world. You talk to a liberal in the US, they think they were to first to support Nelson Mandela and his cause. No they were the last. Even liberals want to make the world believe they're the ones that had superior insight and led it.

China just existing challenges what they've been teaching to their own people on how things work. Religion alone China throws everything they believe out the window. It's a high crime that China has been around for five thousand years when their religion says the Earth has only been around for less. Look at their handling of coronavirus. If everyone did it their way because they claim it's best way, it would seem that was the case. But because other didn't follow them, the world was able to see better results. If they had it their way, no one would've known that.

China just existing shows alternatives and they want no alternatives for people to look on because they won't be following their way and they won't be under their control. So do you think they can leave China alone like it doesn't exist? No, it's a tactic on the belief that people want to believe they are superior therefore they would want to be like them. You can only be superior if you're the one top and the easiest way to make sure you're on top is to push everyone else down and that's what they're doing. If they were naturally superior, they wouldn't have to push everyone else down. But they see any country who doesn't bend the knee as a threat. That's how insecure they are on any country who does not pledge devote loyalty to them. Why is Pompeo calling for the world to unite against China? It's because everything the US has thrown on China hasn't worked as planned. China is not yielding. If China wins, they lose. Loyal Australia sees the writing on the wall hence why they have to draw a line for the US for where they won't go. The US created this system of dependency on the US to make sure countries are loyal. That was at a time when their racially superior beliefs were proud and out in the open. They thought that would never change until China came along to again violate everything they believed. Even US allies have to think about going past the point of no return with China. They will be hurt first more than the US hence why the US needs the world to pay for it and take the pain or else it would be all on the US.

It's a joke that Senator Tom Cotton spun how slavery was a necessary evil because the US saw a future where they would lead on human rights around the world. China also had a major indirect role on why the West cares about human rights. As China was aiding countries in a revolt against Western colonialism, the West had to do something or they would lose it all. Human rights was a Cold War tactic not because it was in their hearts. They had to decolonize or it would seem disingenuous but they setup puppet dictators to make sure they were still in control. And who did they choose? Africa was a continent that had thousands of nations before the West colonized. They picked the most hated group to lead their "former" colony to rule over everyone else to make sure they always ran to their colonial master for help when there was trouble. And remember just like Tom Cotton, they want to make the world believe when the British who violently seized Hong Kong in their campaign to take over and enslave the world had the foresight that they were thinking about the well-being of the Hong Kong people and wanted to establish democracy one hundred fifty-six years later under treaty when they had to handover Hong Kong back. Not anytime earlier when they were in control but later. Take a look at how they believe that Tom Cotton spin when it comes to Hong Kong.

If China were to surrender, someone has to be interim leader that is unelected and chosen by the West before "democracy' can be established. We're suppose to believe they will make the right choice like they did in Africa? Will China be carved up again and rewarded to loyal US allies to administer? How long until a democracy is established? Until everyone is a Christian? Yes that's the undemocratic part that they want to establish first to control China so then "democracy" will always favor them. It'll be as long as the last Chinese born not under their rule is dead from old age before they start thinking about it. That's how long it'll take at least for them to brainwash every Chinese generation afterwards into thinking the West is superior and their God is the only God. And that's if everything goes smoothly...
 

SPOOPYSKELETON

Junior Member
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

I thought the world obeys the US... They wouldn't be questioning the US if they were Kool-Aid drinkers of Jim Jones America.

Why doesn't Australia go all-in when they're playing henchman the most? Like I've been saying, this has been all a bluffing game. I'm not saying it's not serious. I'm saying the goal was believing pressure was going to make China surrender. The point of this thread was to make people believe China was surrounded and the world would turn their backs on China like China doesn't exists and they would go on believing China will wither away and die without them. They're incapable of that because US culture demands that they be in control of everything. China is one-fifth of the world population and people believe they can leave China alone...?

When you talk to Westerners about the Cold War, they think it was all about Europe. The US saw China as a bigger threat than the Soviet Union because it was the first country to kick the West out. WWII weakened the colonialist powers. That's why they were paranoid over China during the Cold War. China was an example for the world to revolt against colonialism and China was working at that. Why was one of Nelson Mandela's first foreign trips after getting out of prison was to China? It's because China was a big supporter and in giving aid to the African National Congress and to other countries around the world. You talk to a liberal in the US, they think they were to first to support Nelson Mandela and his cause. No they were the last. Even liberals want to make the world believe they're the ones that had superior insight and led it.

China just existing challenges what they've been teaching to their own people on how things work. Religion alone China throws everything they believe out the window. It's a high crime that China has been around for five thousand years when their religion says the Earth has only been around for less. Look at their handling of coronavirus. If everyone did it their way because they claim it's best way, it would seem that was the case. But because other didn't follow them, the world was able to see better results. If they had it their way, no one would've known that.

China just existing shows alternatives and they want no alternatives for people to look on because they won't be following their way and they won't be under their control. So do you think they can leave China alone like it doesn't exist? No, it's a tactic on the belief that people want to believe they are superior therefore they would want to be like them. You can only be superior if you're the one top and the easiest way to make sure you're on top is to push everyone else down and that's what they're doing. If they were naturally superior, they wouldn't have to push everyone else down. But they see any country who doesn't bend the knee as a threat. That's how insecure they are on any country who does not pledge devote loyalty to them. Why is Pompeo calling for the world to unite against China? It's because everything the US has thrown on China hasn't worked as planned. China is not yielding. If China wins, they lose. Loyal Australia sees the writing on the wall hence why they have to draw a line for the US for where they won't go. The US created this system of dependency on the US to make sure countries are loyal. That was at a time when their racially superior beliefs were proud and out in the open. They thought that would never change until China came along to again violate everything they believed. Even US allies have to think about going past the point of no return with China. They will be hurt first more than the US hence why the US needs the world to pay for it and take the pain or else it would be all on the US.

It's a joke that Senator Tom Cotton spun how slavery was a necessary evil because the US saw a future where they would lead on human rights around the world. China also had a major indirect role on why the West cares about human rights. As China was aiding countries in a revolt against Western colonialism, the West had to do something or they would lose it all. Human rights was a Cold War tactic not because it was in their hearts. They had to decolonize or it would seem disingenuous but they setup puppet dictators to make sure they were still in control. And who did they choose? Africa was a continent that had thousands of nations before the West colonized. They picked the most hated group to lead their "former" colony to rule over everyone else to make sure they always ran to their colonial master for help when there was trouble. And remember just like Tom Cotton, they want to make the world believe when the British who violently seized Hong Kong in their campaign to take over and enslave the world had the foresight that they were thinking about the well-being of the Hong Kong people and wanted to establish democracy one hundred fifty-six years later under treaty when they had to handover Hong Kong back. Not anytime earlier when they were in control but later. Take a look at how they believe that Tom Cotton spin when it comes to Hong Kong.

If China were to surrender, someone has to be interim leader that is unelected and chosen by the West before "democracy' can be established. We're suppose to believe they will make the right choice like they did in Africa? Will China be carved up again and rewarded to loyal US allies to administer? How long until a democracy is established? Until everyone is a Christian? Yes that's the undemocratic part that they want to establish first to control China so then "democracy" will always favor them. It'll be as long as the last Chinese born not under their rule is dead from old age before they start thinking about it. That's how long it'll take at least for them to brainwash every Chinese generation afterwards into thinking the West is superior and their God is the only God. And that's if everything goes smoothly...
Nah, if China ever surrendered like the USSR, I would go there and shoot Chinese Yeltsin in the face.

Good thing that waont happen though, since it will be America that produces the next Yeltsin.
 

AssassinsMace

Brigadier
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

South Korea and Japan bickering with one another doesn't help the US's cause to contain China. I thought everyone obeys the US looking out for what the US wants first...
 

ansy1968

Junior Member
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

I thought the world obeys the US... They wouldn't be questioning the US if they were Kool-Aid drinkers of Jim Jones America.

Why doesn't Australia go all-in when they're playing henchman the most? Like I've been saying, this has been all a bluffing game. I'm not saying it's not serious. I'm saying the goal was believing pressure was going to make China surrender. The point of this thread was to make people believe China was surrounded and the world would turn their backs on China like China doesn't exists and they would go on believing China will wither away and die without them. They're incapable of that because US culture demands that they be in control of everything. China is one-fifth of the world population and people believe they can leave China alone...?

When you talk to Westerners about the Cold War, they think it was all about Europe. The US saw China as a bigger threat than the Soviet Union because it was the first country to kick the West out. WWII weakened the colonialist powers. That's why they were paranoid over China during the Cold War. China was an example for the world to revolt against colonialism and China was working at that. Why was one of Nelson Mandela's first foreign trips after getting out of prison was to China? It's because China was a big supporter and in giving aid to the African National Congress and to other countries around the world. You talk to a liberal in the US, they think they were to first to support Nelson Mandela and his cause. No they were the last. Even liberals want to make the world believe they're the ones that had superior insight and led it.

China just existing challenges what they've been teaching to their own people on how things work. Religion alone China throws everything they believe out the window. It's a high crime that China has been around for five thousand years when their religion says the Earth has only been around for less. Look at their handling of coronavirus. If everyone did it their way because they claim it's best way, it would seem that was the case. But because other didn't follow them, the world was able to see better results. If they had it their way, no one would've known that.

China just existing shows alternatives and they want no alternatives for people to look on because they won't be following their way and they won't be under their control. So do you think they can leave China alone like it doesn't exist? No, it's a tactic on the belief that people want to believe they are superior therefore they would want to be like them. You can only be superior if you're the one top and the easiest way to make sure you're on top is to push everyone else down and that's what they're doing. If they were naturally superior, they wouldn't have to push everyone else down. But they see any country who doesn't bend the knee as a threat. That's how insecure they are on any country who does not pledge devote loyalty to them. Why is Pompeo calling for the world to unite against China? It's because everything the US has thrown on China hasn't worked as planned. China is not yielding. If China wins, they lose. Loyal Australia sees the writing on the wall hence why they have to draw a line for the US for where they won't go. The US created this system of dependency on the US to make sure countries are loyal. That was at a time when their racially superior beliefs were proud and out in the open. They thought that would never change until China came along to again violate everything they believed. Even US allies have to think about going past the point of no return with China. They will be hurt first more than the US hence why the US needs the world to pay for it and take the pain or else it would be all on the US.

It's a joke that Senator Tom Cotton spun how slavery was a necessary evil because the US saw a future where they would lead on human rights around the world. China also had a major indirect role on why the West cares about human rights. As China was aiding countries in a revolt against Western colonialism, the West had to do something or they would lose it all. Human rights was a Cold War tactic not because it was in their hearts. They had to decolonize or it would seem disingenuous but they setup puppet dictators to make sure they were still in control. And who did they choose? Africa was a continent that had thousands of nations before the West colonized. They picked the most hated group to lead their "former" colony to rule over everyone else to make sure they always ran to their colonial master for help when there was trouble. And remember just like Tom Cotton, they want to make the world believe when the British who violently seized Hong Kong in their campaign to take over and enslave the world had the foresight that they were thinking about the well-being of the Hong Kong people and wanted to establish democracy one hundred fifty-six years later under treaty when they had to handover Hong Kong back. Not anytime earlier when they were in control but later. Take a look at how they believe that Tom Cotton spin when it comes to Hong Kong.

If China were to surrender, someone has to be interim leader that is unelected and chosen by the West before "democracy' can be established. We're suppose to believe they will make the right choice like they did in Africa? Will China be carved up again and rewarded to loyal US allies to administer? How long until a democracy is established? Until everyone is a Christian? Yes that's the undemocratic part that they want to establish first to control China so then "democracy" will always favor them. It'll be as long as the last Chinese born not under their rule is dead from old age before they start thinking about it. That's how long it'll take at least for them to brainwash every Chinese generation afterwards into thinking the West is superior and their God is the only God. And that's if everything goes smoothly...
Hi AssassinsMace,

very good observation, reality had finally dawn on the Australian, but still they are part of ANGLO -SAXON orbit. They are not ASIAN per se, as my earlier statement, they are european (WESTERN) transplant and if war do happen they can easily migrate back to europe and any part of the FIVE EYES country.

China had become a shinning beacon of resistance against western hegemony by the developing countries by my opinion, even some grudging critics acknowledge the positive role China play , Especially in this pandemic, where the world is in anxiety and looking for leadership. It had shattered the invincibility of the US and the western model in particular, it shows that an alternative model do exist.
 

ansy1968

Junior Member
Registered Member
What Chinese threat ?!?! Nowadays everything is aimed by China/Russia.
Hi hullopilllw,

I think whichever party wins ,both will be demonize, the Democratic party had such a hatred for Russia, while the Republican had the same attitude toward China, The strategic partnership between China and Russia is marriage made from heaven
 

Top