China's Space Program Thread II

ZachL111

New Member
Registered Member

China has launched 9 more GuoWang satellites on the Long March 8A from the 1st Commercial Pad, which undertakes two major events. First, this is the launch that will allow GuoWang to pass up the Qianfan constellation, and this is the 600th flight of the Long March Series! This is also the 63rd launch of the year.

The pace at which Long March rockets are launched has increasing by far since they first debuted 55 years ago. The first launch occurred on the 24th of April, 1970. The 100th occurred 37 years and 1 month later. The 200th would come seven years and six months after. The 300th would come four years and three months after. The 400th would launch two years and nine months later. The 500th took only two years to reach, and the 600th, this launch above, took one year and ten months. I can certainly see 100 launches a year soon enough.
 

PeaceKrieger424

New Member
Registered Member
I can certainly see 100 launches a year soon enough.
1760591509965.png
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
(Beyound Earth Orbit lauches not included)

It's tempting to talk about sheer lauch numbers and to award a well deserved kudos to China's space project, how far it's come along. The above graphic displays the USSR's numbers advantage from late 60's to mid 90's BUT how that didn't provide them with the qualitative strategic edge vis a vis United States.

My Point: China's focus here should be "quality over quantity" - and not chasing numerical milestones.
 

ZachL111

New Member
Registered Member
View attachment 162663
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
(Beyound Earth Orbit lauches not included)

It's tempting to talk about sheer lauch numbers and to award a well deserved kudos to China's space project, how far it's come along. The above graphic displays the USSR's numbers advantage from late 60's to mid 90's BUT how that didn't provide them with the qualitative strategic edge vis a vis United States.

My Point: China's focus here should be "quality over quantity" - and not chasing numerical milestones.
I didn't say anything related to quality, I'm saying if they can improve their turnaround times on launch processes, as there are dozens of articles on them doing, they can improve launch times. The argument you're bringing up is the same exact one I bring up when people want to say "SpaceX is single-handedly outdoing China" because while it is true that they launch more per year, they are not engineering the lunar return modules, telescopes, deep space relay satellites, space stations, gravitational wave satellites, mars orbiters, etc. so it is about what you launch, not just how much you launch.

Also no one is talking about chasing numerical milestones, I don't understand how that is what you got from my post. My post was about how amazing it is that they've been able to narrow down the launch cadence over the decades. I'd like to see them hit 100 high quality launches in a year. I am not saying they should chase numerical milestones.
 

PeaceKrieger424

New Member
Registered Member
no one is talking about chasing numerical milestones
:) Nuances of behind the screen communication.

There is this saying associated with Joseph Stalin: "quantity has a quality all its own"...and where this might be true with certain domains, it wasn't accurate for the soviet space program. I'd just hate to see that occur again.

I rest my case. No pun intended.
 

ZachL111

New Member
Registered Member
:) Nuances of behind the screen communication.

There is this saying associated with Joseph Stalin: "quantity has a quality all its own"...and where this might be true with certain domains, it wasn't accurate for the soviet space program. I'd just hate to see that occur again.

I rest my case. No pun intended.
Fair enough, it just sounded a lot different the first time I read it.

I mean there are several differences I will say, China is more competent, but yes I generally agree.

Me as well, lol.
 
Top