escobar
Brigadier
New platform. It land horizontally at Alxa Zuoqi in Inner Mongolia.Aren't they using an existing rocket for the first stage? Is this an entirely new platform?
New platform. It land horizontally at Alxa Zuoqi in Inner Mongolia.Aren't they using an existing rocket for the first stage? Is this an entirely new platform?
Cost is per launch? If so, the cost is $3870 per kg and $2931.9 for LEO, respectively. While this is less than that of traditional rockets it still exceeds that of Falcon 9 and Falcon heavy by quite a bit. When Starship enters the equation it would be even more lopsided.
I think this one (from CALT/CASC) is rocket powered, while the Tengyun from CASIC is the combined cycle.The combined cycle engine for this spaceplane has been tested two years ago? Or was that test without the combined cycle and the recent one a test of that propulsion?
It can be made much cheaper if the first stage consisting of a rocket stage carrying the spacecraft carrier is made recoverable as well.
It can be made very competitive to SpaceX rockets since all the 3 stages of the launch system, i.e. the first stage rocket, spacecraft carrier, the spacecraft/payload are recoverable, unlike SpaceX rockets where only the first stage is recoverable.
Yes but based on the projected timeline, a true SSTO horizontal takeoff and landing variant won’t be ready till near the middle of the century. Unless something catastrophic happens I’m sure starship will be operational by then.
This is why I think China should walk on two legs and investigate recoverable rockets, which it is doing with LM-8.
Space bomber...It will be oriented to orbital altitudes of between 300 to 500 kilometers, meet criteria of being “fast, reliable, and economical,” and meet the needs of military and civilian payloads, and be applicable for space tourism
It is by design and the test just demonstrated it.I was referring to the TSTO carrier spacecraft China apparently just launched. The first stage rocket can be made recoverable to save cost.