China's SCS Strategy Thread

Blackstone

Brigadier
Reality is beginning to sink into some revelers Philippine's so-called "crowning achievement" is little more than a Pyrrhic victory, and things will not end well for Philippines or for anyone else in the SCS.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

The Philippines may have won an emphatic legal victory over China in the South China Sea, but the aptly named Mischief Reef shows just how hard it will be for Manila to make its triumph count in the strategic waterway.

Chinese construction on the reef, which began two decades ago as a few rickety shelters perched on stilts, now covers an area larger than 500 football fields. It includes a 3 km (9,800 feet) runway, extensive housing, parade grounds and radar nests, satellite images show.

According to Tuesday's landmark ruling, however, the reef and everything on it legally belongs to the Philippines and no amount of time or building will change that.

Publicly, Manila has been unusually cautious in its response to the sweeping ruling, urging "restraint and sobriety". In private, officials acknowledge they have little hope of recovering Mischief Reef any time soon despite the unequivocal ruling by the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague.

"This will take time, not in the next five or 10 years," said one senior Philippine navy official, requesting anonymity to speak freely on the highly sensitive matter.

It was, he said, "impossible to evict the Chinese there".

RESOLUTE RESPONSE

Beijing, which boycotted the case from the outset, says the ruling has no bearing on its rights in the South China Sea and has reasserted it claims to Mischief and other features.

On Thursday, the state-run People's Daily ran a picture on its front page of a civilian aircraft landing at the new Mischief airport, two Chinese flags rippling from the cockpit.

"As I've said before, it won't have any effect," Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Lu Kang said, when asked if China would seek to bolster its sovereignty over Mischief Reef.

"At the same time, I want to stress that if any person wants to take the outcome of this arbitration as a basis for taking any provocative steps against China's interests, China will most certainly resolutely respond," Lu told reporters.

With the panel having no powers to enforce its ruling, mainland experts see no sign that China will scale back its actions across the South China Sea.

"The tribunal's decision is so sweeping that it is not going to help solve the problem," said Sienho Yee, an international law specialist at China's Wuhan University.

Other Chinese experts, speaking privately, said the ruling was being closely scrutinized, despite official statements dismissing its relevance.

Some among leadership elites had been "stung" by its comprehensive stance against China.

"There is surprise at the extent of the sheer arrogance of these judges sitting (in Europe) deciding what is a rock and what is an island," said one Beijing-based scholar.

"It can only serve to unify our leadership and harden Chinese views, and that includes the military leadership. There will be little appetite to take a step back."

Manila's "softly, softly" approach reflected its understanding of that risk, Philippine officials said.

"We should find ways to allow some face-saving actions because China could face tremendous domestic pressure," the Philippine navy official said. "We don't want the Chinese Communist Party to be overthrown by the more hot-headed people in the People's Liberation Army. That will be too dangerous."

President Xi Jinping has moved extensively to tighten his grip on power since assuming office almost four years ago and there has been no sign of any such action.

NOTHING MORE THAN SEABED

The decision on Mischief Reef is among the most significant within the 479-page judgment from the panel, which looked at the territorial rights of disputed reefs, rocks and shoals scattered throughout the key trade route.

At a stroke, the court dismissed Beijing's 69-year-old nine-dash line claim to much of the South China Sea and removed any legal basis for Beijing to create a network of linked territorial and economic seas under its control, legal experts said.

Mischief is China's eastern most holding in the resource-rich waterway. Some 300 km (185 miles) west of the Philippines' island of Palawan and 1,100 km (685 miles) from China's Hainan Island, it sits entirely within the Philippines' exclusive economic zone and on its continental shelf.

The panel ruled China's building of installations on reclaimed land, which accelerated sharply after 2014, was illegal and had "aggravated" the dispute under the U.N Convention on the Law of the Sea, under which Manila launched the case in 2013.

The judges backed Philippines' lawyers who used satellite, survey and historical data, including Chinese naval pilot notes, to show Mischief Reef is - legally at least - nothing more than seabed exposed at low tide.

The lawyers gave evidence that its traditional Chinese name - Mi Qi Fu - was based on Mischief's English name, according to court transcripts, seeking to undermine China's argument that it had been, in its words, "master" of the South China Sea for 2,000 years. China calls it Meiji Reef today.

POTENTIAL FLASHPOINT

Regional military officials and diplomats say Mischief is a clear flashpoint in what is expected to be months of tension after the ruling.

Others include Scarborough Shoal, a traditional Philippine fishing ground that was occupied by China in 2012, and Second Thomas Shoal, where a small group of Philippine soldiers is based in the rusting hulk of a grounded ship.

The United States is also watching Mischief closely and has repeatedly warned China against further development of islands within the waters of the Philippines, a formal security ally.

U.S. Republican Senator Dan Sullivan demanded on Wednesday that U.S. ships sail close to Mischief as part of pledged increases in so-called freedom-of-navigation operations.

A U.S. defense official also told Reuters that, if regional competition escalated into confrontation, U.S. naval and air forces were prepared to act to maintain free navigation.

Manila is clear it doesn't want to provoke China further.

"They are a bit angry now," Philippines' Defence Minister Delfin Lorenzana told Reuters. "Emotions are running high and we don't want to provide them any reason to react violently."
 

tidalwave

Senior Member
Registered Member
One silver lining at the ruling
Scarborough is within Philippines eez but Chinese fishermen and Philippines fishermen both share the ground for fishing.

That's US cannot possibly have the excuses to kick out Chinese ships. US can help Philippines ships to get in but cannot kick out Chinese ships.
 
I know the press-release has been posted in
US Military News, Reports, Data, etc.
already, but I think it's very important CNO Richardson Heading to China
richardon.jpg
The U.S. Chief of Naval Operations is headed to Beijing next week to meet his Chinese counterpart, a Navy official told USNI News on Thursday.

Adm. John Richardson will spend three days in China starting on July 17, will meet with his People’s Liberation Army Navy counterpart Adm. Wu Shengli, tour the PLAN’s submarine academy and its lone carrier Liaoning, according to a release from the service.

It will be Richardson’s first trip to China since becoming CNO. His predecessor –
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
– met with Wu several times during his tenure and developed a close working relationship.

“I have been looking forward to this trip and to meeting Admiral Wu for some time,” Richardson in a statement.
“These are important times for our two navies and for maritime forces throughout the region. As we seek to learn from each other, there is no substitute for these types of face-to-face meetings.”

Richardson’s visit will come a week after an international tribunal issued a ruling that invalidated many of Beijing’s claims to extensive holdings in the South China Sea – a ruling Chinese leadership said they would not recognize.

According to the service, South China Sea issues will be a topic of conversation between Richardson and Wu.

While the rhetoric between Washington and Beijing over Chinese actions in the South China Sea have been high, the tenor of the military-to-military interaction between the PLAN and the U.S. Navy is mostly professional, USNI News understands.

Wu and Richadson have held three video teleconferences since Richardson took the CNO position in September.

During the last conversation in January, Wu outlined the Chinese position on installations built on artificial island in the South China Sea.

“Our necessary defensive step of building on islands and reefs in the Nansha (Spratly) Islands is not militarization, but this has been maliciously hyped up by certain countries and media,”
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
at the time.
“We will certainly not seek the militarization of the islands and reefs, but we won’t not set up defenses. How many defenses completely depends on the level of threat we face.”

The following is the July 14, 2016 statement from the Navy on CNO Richardson’s trip to China.
...
... skipped:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Blackstone

Brigadier
One silver lining at the ruling
Scarborough is within Philippines eez but Chinese fishermen and Philippines fishermen both share the ground for fishing.
Problem is, China hasn't allowed Philippines fishermen into Scarborough.

That's US cannot possibly have the excuses to kick out Chinese ships. US can help Philippines ships to get in but cannot kick out Chinese ships.
Not even President Hillary would risk war with China to physically "kick out" Chinese ships, some of which would no doubt be PLAN vessels.
 

tidalwave

Senior Member
Registered Member
Problem is, China hasn't allowed Philippines fishermen into Scarborough.


Not even President Hillary would risk war with China to physically "kick out" Chinese ships, some of which would no doubt be PLAN vessels.

That's means China already won half of the battle. They can be there 24/7 according to so called international law


Allowing Philippines to go in is totally different story.
 

tidalwave

Senior Member
Registered Member
A lot of US media have written and said to help Philippines to kick out the Chinese in Scarborough.

Well, they don't know what the heck they talking about.

Obviously they didn't pay attention to the nuances of the ruling.
 

tidalwave

Senior Member
Registered Member
That means Indonesian navy shooting at Chinese fishermen is illegal. Eez is not exclusively. It can be shared like the ruling said about Scarborough .

That means China can sue Indonesia or justifiably sink their navy ships shooting at Chinese ships.
 

Blackstone

Brigadier
That means Indonesian navy shooting at Chinese fishermen is illegal. Eez is not exclusively. It can be shared like the ruling said about Scarborough .

That means China can sue Indonesia or justifiably sink their navy ships shooting at Chinese ships.
No chance China sues anyone over the PCA opinion paper on SCS disputes, because it would mean lending legitimacy to a non-UN, non-court, and non-democratic debating club China said it didn't recognize.
 

tidalwave

Senior Member
Registered Member
No chance China sues anyone over the PCA opinion paper on SCS disputes, because it would mean lending legitimacy to a non-UN, non-court, and non-democratic debating club China said it didn't recognize.
Then Indonesian navy better watch out, China now has excuse to sink Indonesian navy for shooting at Chinese fishing ships.
 
Top