China's SCS Strategy Thread

Iron Man

Major
Registered Member
I wonder why such confusion & nonsense are so popular. :oops:
I found this popular comment under TWZ's article
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.

View attachment 146300

Also this from Alex via X.


Do they have a point?:rolleyes:
Alex Luck is a tool to begin with. Would he be ok with it if China made an alliance (or even just a "partnership") with the Solomon Islands and sailed its miliary vessels back and forth close to Australia? My guess is Alex would NOT actually be ok with it. :D
 

vincent

Grumpy Old Man
Staff member
Moderator - World Affairs

GulfLander

Colonel
Registered Member
I wonder why such confusion & nonsense are so popular. :oops:
I found this popular comment under TWZ's article
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.

View attachment 146300

Also this from Alex via X.


Do they have a point?:rolleyes:
If it already "failed" in the PH, then they hav nothing to worry or fear abt the continued presemce of CN navy there? But also, PH has many times do exercises or pass through w US, aus etc before too, why?, if CN actions not working?
 

AndrewJ

Junior Member
Registered Member
I found this popular comment under TWZ's article
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.

1740365750476.png

We have to admit, that China is not Iran, who often tells the audience (including enemies) what it's going to do before military operations/drills. China believes the audience prefer surprises. :p
 
Last edited:

GulfLander

Colonel
Registered Member
"China’s new submarine may have Typhon missiles in Philippines in its sights, report says
Vessel being built in Wuhan, designed to carry advanced hypersonic missiles, could serve as deterrent, according to semi-official magazine[...]
The People’s Liberation Army has yet to confirm that the larger class of submarine is under development. But the report in Naval & Merchant Ships – a publication owned by China State Shipbuilding Corporation, a supplier to the PLA Navy – provides details of the vessel’s design and capabilities, indirectly confirming its existence and the rationale behind it.[...]"

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

GenghisCant

New Member
Registered Member

Biscuits

Colonel
Registered Member
I wonder why such confusion & nonsense are so popular. :oops:
I found this popular comment under TWZ's article
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.

View attachment 146300

Also this from Alex via X.


Do they have a point?:rolleyes:
In his own statement he talks about initating territorial aggression against China... Is this the official plan of Australia?

If they plan to attack us, Beijing would know and make counterplans to destroy their ability to be aggressive. Better hope US spares a lot of air defense and whatever assets are used to destroy seaborne drones...
 

Lethe

Captain
I'm still waiting for the comparative analysis of analogous live fire exercises conducted by various states over time that demonstrates either how unprecedented and outrageous or, alternatively, how entirely unremarkable the recent conduct of PLAN vessels in the Tasman Sea actually was. That nobody appears both equipped and motivated to build a case for either of those positions is itself rather suggestive.
 
Last edited:

tygyg1111

Captain
Registered Member
I wonder why such confusion & nonsense are so popular. :oops:
I found this popular comment under TWZ's article
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.

View attachment 146300

Also this from Alex via X.


Do they have a point?:rolleyes:

They're just coping with the "it's just some crazy guy doing this; China wouldn't disrespect us like that".

But no, a dog gets what a dog deserves; especially a dog that thinks its people
 
Top