china military report 2010

montyp165

Junior Member
Why is that? Did you read any of the report?

DOD reports all too often either understate potential force capabilities in a threat analysis to facilitate and justify unilateral action or overstate threats to increase military expenditures, which they did with the Soviets and do so with the PRC military budget. I do say though that the military still shows a greater degree of professionalism than the arms of the civilian government.
 

bd popeye

The Last Jedi
VIP Professional
DOD reports all too often either understate potential force capabilities in a threat analysis to facilitate and justify unilateral action or overstate threats to increase military expenditures, which they did with the Soviets and do so with the PRC military budget. I do say though that the military still shows a greater degree of professionalism than the arms of the civilian government.

I agree.. The US DoD must have a opposing foe they are preparing for. Otherwise the defense $$$$ will dry up.
 

Maggern

Junior Member
I agree.. The US DoD must have a opposing foe they are preparing for. Otherwise the defense $$$$ will dry up.

Indeed. It is the basic mechanism of all rational actors: justify your own existence and maximize your resources.

That being said, I'm sure the DoD has a bit more clue about what they are talking about as they are in fact military guys, as compared to all those civilian bloggers and pundits who "analyze" China's military...
 

bd popeye

The Last Jedi
VIP Professional
I'm sure the DoD has a bit more clue about what they are talking about as they are in fact military guys, as compared to all those civilian bloggers and pundits who "analyze" China's military...

I agree again. Al those bloggers know is what they read on military websites and from what their military "friends" tell them. Most, I do believe, have never served a single day in any military.
 

tphuang

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
I need to carefully look over the report again when I have some time, but I really don't get anything new from reading these reports unfortunately. At least that's from skimming over it last night.
 

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Here is the Chinese reaction to the report. I don't see how it was an angry reaction.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Beijing – Beijing reacted angrily Wednesday to a Pentagon report expressing worries about China’s burgeoning military capabilities, calling such concerns baseless. “The report ignores the objective truth and accuses China for its normal national defense and army construction” said Chinese Defense Ministry spokesman Geng Yansheng. “The development of the Chinese army is reasonable and proper.” This year's annual Pentagon report on China's military capabilities, delivered to Congress on Monday, outlined China’s moves to boost its military strength and warned that “the limited transparency in China’s military and security affairs enhances uncertainty and increases the potential for misunderstanding and miscalculation.” Admiral Mike Mullen, Chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, complained recently that China’s suspension of military-to-military links made it harder for Washington to assess Beijing’s intentions. He said China’s investment in “high-end” weaponry had moved him from being “curious about what they are doing to being concerned.”

Beijing cut off military ties with Washington earlier this year to protest a $6.4 billion US arms sale to Taiwan, which China regards as a renegade province. The Peoples Liberation Army has issued its own reports on its activities in recent years, and has played a growing role in international peacekeeping operations, such as the antipiracy patrols in the Gulf of Aden. US officials are skeptical, however, about the accuracy of China’s accounts of its military. They believe, for example, that Beijing in fact spends twice as much as its official 2010 defense budget of 78 billion dollars.

Chinese analysts are doubtful that Beijing will meet US demands for greater transparency any time soon. “It takes time to change mentalities” says Shen Dingli, a security expert at Shanghai’s Fudan university. “Incrementally China is providing more transparency…but we will have to wait for a generational change” in China’s military leadership to see a change in attitude, he cautions. Such a change would smooth China’s relationship not only with the United States but also with neighbors such as Japan and India, Professor Shen points out. “China should be more courageous in transparency and build its confidence…to make other countries confident about its defense buildup” he argues. Releasing information about the country’s weapons research and development programs and its purchases would help “avoid the pitfall of being seen unnecessarily as a threat,” Shen adds. The Pentagon report highlighted China’s work on a ballistic missile capable of attacking aircraft carriers more than 930 miles away, the continuing buildup of missiles aimed at Taiwan, and Beijing’s plans – still officially unannounced – to begin construction of China’s first aircraft carrier.
 

Finn McCool

Captain
Registered Member
I can't find the article right now but Xinhua had some Chinese civilian "experts" to say that the report was "unprofessional" and that China couldn't possibly meet the standard of transparency that the US publicly demands (which is probably true).
 
Top