China Ballistic Missiles and Nuclear Arms Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

ougoah

Brigadier
Registered Member
It's almost like US 1%er Elites seriously considered a sneak nuclear attack on China, General Ripper style.

Well they always have been like that. Look at Ben Shapiro and what he thinks about foreigners and foreign actors who dare defy "godly" righteous USA, Israel's 1st and foremost henchman. How many lives he thinks is expendable for 1 American soldier invading foreign lands to force their "rules based order" upon everyone.

For better or worse we should also remember that these guys already beat Japan in WW2 and beat it dead but they still wanted to test a uranium design bomb and a plutonium one on major cities with mostly civilian population. No qualms or really any care for life that isn't white and isn't a follower of their "rules based order".

They have wanted to nuke China since their masters realised the Chinese are not playing their game and staying within the paddock they built for China. Sino Soviet split -> capital going into China -> realising CPC won't be playing their game -> reverse policy on China.
 

bustead

Junior Member
Registered Member
It's almost like US 1%er Elites seriously considered a sneak nuclear attack on China, General Ripper style.
Considering the fact that the US seriously considered attacking Chinese nuclear forces in the 60s, I would not be surprised if such plans still exist up to the early 2000s. However, given the development of Chinese second strike capabilities, it would be suicidal for the US to actually put those plans into action.
 

davidau

Senior Member
Registered Member
Considering the fact that the US seriously considered attacking Chinese nuclear forces in the 60s, I would not be surprised if such plans still exist up to the early 2000s. However, given the development of Chinese second strike capabilities, it would be suicidal for the US to actually put those plans into action.
They will get a bloody nose if not a broken body, if they dare!
 

AssassinsMace

Lieutenant General
There was that story a few weeks back that polled around 30% of Americans just want China militarily attacked to show who's boss. No provocation by China needed. That's how much desperate Americans feel they're losing control of a world that doesn't belong to them in the first place. Can you imagine what they would say if Chinese said that about the US?
 

bustead

Junior Member
Registered Member
They will get a bloody nose if not a broken body, if they dare!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

"Using HPAC, we calculated the combined effects of 4 Mt nuclear detonations on 20 populous U.S. cities, including Washington, D.C. From 15.8 million to 26.1 million fatalities and 40.6 million to 41.3 million casualties would result. [...] We also explored the effects of fallout, should the Chinese warheads be detonated as ground bursts. The calculated numbers of casualties are two to four times higher than for the air burst scenario (Figure 94), and very widespread fallout contamination would occur across the United States and Eastern Canada."

So from this, we can assume that 20 DF-5s can cause 82-160 million American casualties. DF-41s and DF-31s are not even accounted for in this simulation.
 

bustead

Junior Member
Registered Member
IMO, China needs to be able to ensure that it can deliver at least 20 high yield warheads to the US. 200 silos would not be enough for this unless the PLARF is capable and authorized to launch on warning, assuming that 4% of all silos would survive. 500-600 silos are needed for such a strike.

Alternatively, China can build missiles with larger mobile ICBMs capable of delivering larger warheads/more MIRVs.
 

Sardaukar20

Captain
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

"Using HPAC, we calculated the combined effects of 4 Mt nuclear detonations on 20 populous U.S. cities, including Washington, D.C. From 15.8 million to 26.1 million fatalities and 40.6 million to 41.3 million casualties would result. [...] We also explored the effects of fallout, should the Chinese warheads be detonated as ground bursts. The calculated numbers of casualties are two to four times higher than for the air burst scenario (Figure 94), and very widespread fallout contamination would occur across the United States and Eastern Canada."

So from this, we can assume that 20 DF-5s can cause 82-160 million American casualties. DF-41s and DF-31s are not even accounted for in this simulation.
Good. That should scare some of the smarter policy makers in the USA. Nevertheless, for the morons, like the people in the Republican Party, this is not enough. They might not read or be able comprehend this. What they need to know is not the just the horrors of nuclear war. But that China's nuclear arsenal is way bigger than the 200-300 warhead quoted figure.

I believe that the conservative Americans have a lower threshold of horror for nuclear genocide on a non-Caucasian population. China has to live with that reality. These people don't respect cultural diversity. These people only respect strength. Better to have over-kill strength that roughly approaches America's strength than to be appearing 'weak' and giving them the audacity to tempt fate.
 

DarkStar

Junior Member
Registered Member
There was that story a few weeks back that polled around 30% of Americans just want China militarily attacked to show who's boss. No provocation by China needed. That's how much desperate Americans feel they're losing control of a world that doesn't belong to them in the first place. Can you imagine what they would say if Chinese said that about the US?
If anything, it makes me feel better about perpetrating war crimes on the american civilian population in the event of war.
Good. That should scare some of the smarter policy makers in the USA. Nevertheless, for the morons, like the people in the Republican Party, this is not enough. They might not read or be able comprehend this. What they need to know is not the just the horrors of nuclear war. But that China's nuclear arsenal is way bigger than the 200-300 warhead quoted figure.

I believe that the conservative Americans have a lower threshold of horror for nuclear genocide on a non-Caucasian population. China has to live with that reality. These people don't respect cultural diversity. These people only respect strength. Better to have over-kill strength that roughly approaches America's strength than to be appearing 'weak' and giving them the audacity to tempt fate.
These conservative americans are as Chris Hedges put it, christian ISIS who see nuclear holocaust as their ticket to getting to heaven and bringing about a new golden age of christian fascism.
 

AndrewS

Brigadier
Registered Member
There was that story a few weeks back that polled around 30% of Americans just want China militarily attacked to show who's boss. No provocation by China needed. That's how much desperate Americans feel they're losing control of a world that doesn't belong to them in the first place. Can you imagine what they would say if Chinese said that about the US?

Source please
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top