I agree with you. There should be some margins for sure.In engineering there is such thing as designing over the specification to allow room for error.
I agree with you. There should be some margins for sure.In engineering there is such thing as designing over the specification to allow room for error.
Yes definitely, although since the action of opening one’s bay to launch a missile then closing it takes a matter of seconds it’s very likely the enemy will see something pop up on the radar and disappear relatively quickly. With any luck (and proper range and attitude management) this will make the jet very hard to be locked and locatedIn combat scenarios, when a stealth plane open IWB & launch missiles, won't its RCS grow significantly larger, thus gets detected immediately by enemy radars?
How do 5th gen & 6th gen aircrafts slove this problem? Or it's a problem can't be solved anyway?![]()
Also to be considered is the distance from the target aircraft, if the distance is around 200km away, the exposed door hatch treated with ram, couple with ECM to disrupt enemy's radar, there is less chance of being detected.Yes definitely, although since the action of opening one’s bay to launch a missile then closing it takes a matter of seconds it’s very likely the enemy will see something pop up on the radar and disappear relatively quickly. With any luck (and proper range and attitude management) this will make the jet very hard to be locked and located
Obviously bullshit
dont forget that in networked warfare, the sensor platform doesn't have to be the shooter. it will be more valuable to let a stealth platform sit passive closer to the enemy, supporting a missile that a different teammate further away launches. this has already been demonstrated by both americans and russians using f-35 and su-35 guiding surface to air missiles.In combat scenarios, when a stealth plane open IWB & launch missiles, won't its RCS grow significantly larger, thus gets detected immediately by enemy radars?
How do 5th gen & 6th gen aircrafts slove this problem? Or it's a problem can't be solved anyway?![]()
Yes when a stealth plane opens the IWB there is a large increase in RCS, this has actually mattered in real combat before, see the Serbian shootdown of F117 in 1999. However IWB is only open for a very short time so this is something that is pretty marginal. Warfare is chaotic and unpredictable so maybe there will be some freak occurrence where this once again leads to the downing of a stealth plane.In combat scenarios, when a stealth plane open IWB & launch missiles, won't its RCS grow significantly larger, thus gets detected immediately by enemy radars?
How do 5th gen & 6th gen aircrafts slove this problem? Or it's a problem can't be solved anyway?![]()
Typical illusions about the performance of electronic warfareHe is the one said Chinese EW was so advanced that IAF pilot saw warning messages in Chinese through their HUD during 5-7 battle.
They don't solve it other than making the launch sequence as fast as possible. Primarily, they attempt to kill their enemies before they can meaningfully react and then leave location. I think this was among the major reasons why supercruise was a requirement for the F-22 and Sino fifth gens. I also think this is partially why China and US didn't introduce ramjet powered AAMs.In combat scenarios, when a stealth plane open IWB & launch missiles, won't its RCS grow significantly larger, thus gets detected immediately by enemy radars?
How do 5th gen & 6th gen aircrafts slove this problem? Or it's a problem can't be solved anyway?![]()
I have a feeling even a momentarily spike in RCS in unlucky scenarios could result in a lock. Modern AESAs could focus their beam to achieve a higher than normal range sensitivity provided it knows where to look so if timed correctly it might be possible to lock on to a stealthy target even if spike in signature is temporarily.They don't solve it other than making the launch sequence as fast as possible. Primarily, they attempt to kill their enemies before they can meaningfully react and then leave location. I think this was among the major reasons why supercruise was a requirement for the F-22 and Sino fifth gens. I also think this is partially why China and US didn't introduce ramjet powered AAMs.