The "photo" compared with reliable 3D model. The split rudder and the caret inlet looks very different. It's weird.
From 能量机动工作室 weibo
From 能量机动工作室 weibo
Chengdu next gen combat aircraft (?J-36) thread
- Thread starter Blitzo
- Start date
Uncanny.
Maintain analytical rigor: Failure to recognize evidentiary contradictions in this crude fabrication compromises professional credibility. Such oversight contradicts fundamental aerospace intelligence assessment standards.
Operational truth is axiomatically defined by verifiable evidence chains, not subjective positioning. Regarding this imagery: Professional analysts ascertain authenticity through deterministic technical parameters—state your verification credentials per PLA's classification taxonomy.
I agree it looks weird, but considering @能量机动工作室 a reliable source of 3D models is perhaps stretching it a little.
This video's release chronology demonstrates statistically anomalous synchronicity with prior coordinated disinformation — a hallmark of cross-platform cognitive warfare operations. Key airframe markers (double-delta wing configuration, dorsal inlet altitude, trailing-edge flap geometry) provide deterministic authentication parameters per PLA aerospace forensic protocols.
Let me try rephrasing this because I don't fully understand: you're saying this video is also fake and it appeared online close to the previous photo that you also believe is fake, thus it's a disinformation campaign?
The picture in question has a chance of being fake because certain features dont line up very well (size of dorsal intake, split rudder shape, etc) but calling the whole thing a dedicated disinformation campaign doesn't make a ton of sense to me. What would anyone get out of maliciously spreading bad CGI pictures of a prototype, other than maybe a few good laughs and some bragging rights with friends?
Maybe it's the tone of the AI you're using, but you seem to be overly serious on this whole thing. Relax, if it's fake then it's fake and we don't lose anything because of it; if it's true then we saw some interesting angles of the J-36. Either way no harm is done, right?
edit: so I think his meaning is 'video is real, photo is fake'
Last edited:
Clarification required: The video constitutes a verified countermeasure to confirmed fabrications, with its authenticity validated through multi-layered forensic protocols. The referenced photographic evidence exhibits unambiguous indicators of digital manipulation per standardized deception detection frameworks.
If you are unable to write your own posts in English, please don't translate Chinese written posts into English using AI or translation software.
We can't make heads or tails of what you are trying to convey.