Can J-8 supercruise?

Supercruise is often thought of as a new technology for fighters like F/A-22 or mabey Typhoon, so it might seem odd to ask if an "old" and "low-tech" fighter like J-8 can supercruise. However, it is actually easier to make a supercruising turbojet aircraft than it is to make a supercruising turbofan aircraft as turbojets often have a better dry thrust/weight ratio and thrust decreases less with high speeds. Also, some old jets like F-104 and English Electric Lighting could go above mach 1 while in a "clean" configuration, though thier performance is really more transonic than supersonic.

J-8 has significantly better thrust/weight ratio than the f-104 or the EEL, especially the versions with newer engines. The newest f-8 engines (Kunlun II aka WP-14b) are said to be the most advanced turbojets in the world, though that is a somwhat dubious distinction now that almost all aircraft are powered by turbofans. So I was wondering, how fast can J-8 go without using afterburners? Can J-8 supercruise?

nope, supercruise only counts if it can supercruise at supersonic speed. I doubt J-8 can do that.

If you are talking about subsonic supercruise, even JH-7A has it.

tphuang said:

nope, supercruise only counts if it can supercruise at supersonic speed. I doubt J-8 can do that.

Click to expand...

What makes you so certain of that? With the newer engines, J-8's dry thrust is greater than its (empty) weight, which is something that many newer fighters can't say. And, as I said before, the J-8's turbojets will be able to maintian that trust at higher speeds better than other plane's turbofans.

The plane has a powerful engine and is light, but I doubt it can with its conventional wing, a large body, and bad aerodynamics. The design was simple.

The airodynamics are poor when it comes to manuverability, but the J-8 was designed as a high speed intercepter, so I don't think I should have a huge ammount of drag compared with most other aircraft. The more I think about it, the more it seems like the J-8 (with new engines) should be able supercruise. When the J-8 had older WP-13 engines it was able to go mach 2.2. It looks like the new Kunlun II engines have a dry thrust 79% as large as the full thrust of the older WP-13 engines, and it seems like a Mach 2.2 aircraft that looses 21% of its thrust should at least be able remain supersonic.

Israel project Kurnas2000, aka Phantom whit Pratt&Whitney PW1120 turbofans was able to fly over Mach 1 whitout afterburner. PW1120 were scaled down F-100 and the possible engine choice for Lavi and even swedish Gripen, thus the swedens later choice went to F-404, as the PW1120 wasent in production yet and Swedens didnt want to be the first users of that new engine...

j-8 wont supercruise. the chinese media would be bragging about it like there was no tommorow. the first to suoercrusie may be j10, since its pretty light.

tphuang said:

nope, supercruise only counts if it can supercruise at supersonic speed. I doubt J-8 can do that.

If you are talking about subsonic supercruise, even JH-7A has it.

Click to expand...

subsonic supercruise???? what is that? wouldn't it just be 'cruise' without the super, or did I miss the true meaning of supercruise?

walter said:

subsonic supercruise???? what is that? wouldn't it just be 'cruise' without the super, or did I miss the true meaning of supercruise?

Click to expand...

i believe supercruise means to fly at mach1 plus without using afterburners. a subsonic cruse may mean that they canfly below mach 1 without afteburners, which all fighters can.

J-10? I doubt J-10 will ever be able to supercruise. While J-10 has excellent agility and low speed manuverability, it is not meant to be a high speed intercepter like the J-8, and it is difficult to make a fighter that can supercruise while only using a single turbofan. The J-8 and J-10 are very close to the same weight, but the J-8 actually has over 30% more dry thrust than the J-10. This is why the "old fashioned" J-8 has a much better chance of achieving supercruise than the more advanced J-10.

As for the Chinese media bragging about it, mabey they would and mabey they wouldn't. It's hard to tell sometimes what sorts of things the Chinese will play up for propaganda and what sorts of thing they will hide due to secrecy or because they avoid giving ammunition to the "China threat theorists". Or they could just assume that no one would care, since it is more of an academic curiosity than something with actual operational utility. The J-8's turbojets must use up a lot of fuel even while running dry, and the J-8 does not have internal stowage like the F-22 so putting weapons on it would significantly degrade it's performance.