Avro CF-105 Arrow (Stolen/Lost Technology)

alwaysfresh

New Member
All this BS about copying technology with China. I wanted to say everyone in the world does it and the best example is above the Avro CF-105 Arrow from Canada. It was cancelled for its success. All that technology was a big lost for the Canadian economy.

avro%20arrow.jpg

avroclimb.gif

arrow.jpg

arrow3.gif


"In April 1953, after a year of analysis by Avro, the Royal Canadian Air Force (RCAF) presented a requirement for a twin-engined, two-seat interceptor with a maximum speed of Mach 2, a maximum ceiling of 18.3 kilometers (60,000 feet), and a combat radius of 370 kilometers (200 nautical miles).
...
On 20 February 1959, Prime Minister Diefenbaker cancelled the CF-105, with the order taking effect immediately. The prototype Arrows had completed 66 flights, for a total of 70 hours of flying time. The first Mark 2 prototype was almost ready for flight tests, with four more Mark 2s virtually complete. All the Arrows built or in production were scrapped, and design documentation and production tooling was generally disposed of. None of the Iroquois-powered Mark 2s ever flew.
...
Avro ended up laying off 14,000 workers. The layoffs were a massive shock to Canada's aircraft industry, and the day of the Arrow's cancellation has been known as "Black Friday" ever since. Air Marshall Campbell obtained 66 F-101 Voodoo supersonic interceptors from the United States to handle his air-defense requirements. The Voodoo was a perfectly modern aircraft for the time, capable of Mach 2 flight; it wasn't an Arrow by any means, but it was available.
...
Interestingly, while the Canadians were working on the Arrow, the Americans were working on a conceptually similar long-range, high-performance interceptor, the North American "F-108 Rapier". The Rapier never got beyond the mockup stage, being cancelled in September 1959. The same logic that worked against the Arrow worked against the Rapier, with the same results. Whatever the facts of the case, it is hard not to sympathize with those who dream of the CF-105 thundering on patrol over Canada's snow-covered north.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Last edited:

ahho

Junior Member
@_@ So did you just watch the CBC mini-series/drama "The Arrow" and felt like making a post? ^_^

lol
that series was so long ago.
Damn politics got in the way. If Canada made it too production stage, it may help the government earn some money
 

Neutral Zone

Junior Member
I'm always struck about the similarities between the story of the Arrow and of another cancelled Cold War aircraft project, the British TSR2.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


In both cases you had radical, state of the art aircraft that were probably too complex and expensive for the time and both suffered from constantly changing design requirements, many of which were politically driven and after their cancellations, both governments went for American aircraft, Voodoo for Canada and F-111 for Britain (subsequently cancelled). Perhaps if the RAF and the RCAF had been prepared to accept a less highly advanced aircraft in the beginning then both of these programmes may have made it into service in some form. The loss of these projects also meant that both these countries lost the capability to indigenously design and develop advanced military aircraft and that was probably a greater loss than the aircraft themselves. :(
 

Pointblank

Senior Member
The problem is high costs for a limited production run. The costs for developing military equipment for only 1 end user with only a limited number constructed is prohibitive. Large number of purchases drive down costs by amortizing R&D across a larger production run.
 

Tasman

Junior Member
The problem is high costs for a limited production run. The costs for developing military equipment for only 1 end user with only a limited number constructed is prohibitive. Large number of purchases drive down costs by amortizing R&D across a larger production run.

What you say is perfectly true but the Arrow's predecessor the CF100 was a very successful all weather interceptor and some 692 were built. I always thought the CF100 was far superior to comparable British all weather fighters like the Meteor NF11 and NF14. The Arrow would have built on the expertise developed through the CF100 program but perhaps Neutral Zone is right and it was too big a jump. I think the Americans learned a lot from transitioning into supersonic fighters through the F100 and F102 (both Mach 1.2 aircraft) before moving to Mach 2 successors.

I still think it is a great pity that this aircraft was not developed and put into production.

Cheers
 
Top