AUKUS News, Views, Analysis.

Lethe

Captain
Australia is
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
over reports that the Solomon Islands may permit some kind of Chinese naval presence. Canberra is very careful to use the correct language here -- the concern is all about the sovereignty of the Solomon Islands, see? -- because they certainly don't want any parallels drawn between Australia's obviously very legitimate and benign concern about the strategic choices of nations thousands of kilometres from its shores and Russia's outrageous concerns about the strategic choices of nations right next door. But occasionally the mask slips a little:

Home Affairs Minister Karen Andrews said the Australian government would view any expansion of Chinese military activity in the Pacific as concerning. "That is our backyard. This is our neighbourhood and we are very concerned of any activity that is taking place in the Pacific Islands.
 

Michaelsinodef

Senior Member
Registered Member
Australia is
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
over reports that the Solomon Islands may permit some kind of Chinese naval presence. Canberra is very careful to use the correct language here -- the concern is all about the sovereignty of the Solomon Islands, see? -- because they certainly don't want any parallels drawn between Australia's obviously very legitimate and benign concern about the strategic choices of nations thousands of kilometres from its shores and Russia's outrageous concerns about the strategic choices of nations right next door. But occasionally the mask slips a little:
Rules for thee, not for me lol

Anyways lets see what they are gonna do I suppose.
 

Overbom

Brigadier
Registered Member
Australia is
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
over reports that the Solomon Islands may permit some kind of Chinese naval presence. Canberra is very careful to use the correct language here -- the concern is all about the sovereignty of the Solomon Islands, see? -- because they certainly don't want any parallels drawn between Australia's obviously very legitimate and benign concern about the strategic choices of nations thousands of kilometres from its shores and Russia's outrageous concerns about the strategic choices of nations right next door. But occasionally the mask slips a little:
Surely Solomon Islands are next in line to be couped and "liberated" by the CIA
 

Lethe

Captain
Surely Solomon Islands are next in line to be couped and "liberated" by the CIA

It's a dangerous world for small (in this case, tiny) nations in the shadow of great powers, but it is not without possibilities. if Honiara plays its cards right, it can play Washington and Beijing off against each other and bask in the patronage of both. It's a lucrative game, but a risky one that can certainly end with a coup in the night.
 

Bellum_Romanum

Brigadier
Registered Member
Australia is
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
over reports that the Solomon Islands may permit some kind of Chinese naval presence. Canberra is very careful to use the correct language here -- the concern is all about the sovereignty of the Solomon Islands, see? -- because they certainly don't want any parallels drawn between Australia's obviously very legitimate and benign concern about the strategic choices of nations thousands of kilometres from its shores and Russia's outrageous concerns about the strategic choices of nations right next door. But occasionally the mask slips a little:
Well, they (Australia) can either put up with this or fight China over this, by trying to essentially invade the Solomon Islands, or in their propagandist words: Special Operations for Freedom and Liberation of the Solomon Islands.
 

Lethe

Captain
Well, they (Australia) can either put up with this or fight China over this, by trying to essentially invade the Solomon Islands, or in their propagandist words: Special Operations for Freedom and Liberation of the Solomon Islands.

Large-scale violence lies at the extreme range of policy response options. Realistically, there are many levers Canberra and Washington can use to dissuade Honiara from this choice. The choice of tools is not a moral one, it's about cost vs. blowback.

Really, it's worth examining just how hysterical the Australian national security apparatus is about the prospect of a Chinese naval presence some 2000km from Australia. Consider
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
article from Washington's pet Australian think tank:

If China establishes a military presence in the Solomons, we could in 15 years see People’s Liberation Army maritime surveillance aircraft using Honiara to keep a permanent surveillance cap over our east coast.

Beijing could have installed signals intelligence systems able to suck up electronic emissions from Cairns to Melbourne and an over-the-horizon radar system to track ship and aircraft movements.

What if China covertly brought into the Solomons anti-aircraft missile batteries or a stock of sea mines able to be laid by Chinese ‘civilian’ fishing boats?

A Chinese military base in Honiara crosses a line that Canberra cannot permit. Moreover, Washington will share these concerns and expect Australia to find a way to stop this agreement being finalised [....]

The onus is on Australia to come up with a compelling reason for Solomon Islands to see us as its best possible security partner. The offer to establish an Australian naval base would be a good start. How about jointly offering with the Americans a series of long-term military construction, engineering and medical visits to help the country’s decaying infrastructure?

This amounts to yet another task for the Defence checklist and another reason why our military spending needs to double from its current 2.1% floor. Consider it the price of regional leadership. The Chinese will eat our lunch for us if we can’t or won’t make the effort ourselves.
 
Last edited:

B.I.B.

Captain
Large-scale violence lies at the extreme range of policy response options. Realistically, there are many levers Canberra and Washington can use to dissuade Honiara from this choice. The choice of tools is not a moral one, it's about cost vs. blowback.

Really, it's worth examining just how hysterical the Australian national security apparatus is about the prospect of a Chinese naval presence some 2000km from Australia. Consider
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
article from Washington's pet Australian think tank:
Do folks here think that China should start a bidding war with Australia to win the Solomons' favour?
 

Lethe

Captain
Do folks here think that China should start a bidding war with Australia to win the Solomons' favour?

China reasonably wants stable arrangements that allow for overseas logistics and potentially basing facilities for its warships. Washington and Canberra are going to oppose each and every conceivable candidate across the "Asia Pacific" with all the diplomatic, economic, and covert means at their disposal (providing intelligence and funding for local political opposition being the most likely forms of covert intervention). The question for Beijing is about which candidates offer the best prospects for both utility and success and how to go about securing a stable, long-term arrangements. Whether or not the Solomon Islands is a good candidate for Beijing to pursue is a question I will leave to experts with more knowledge and interest in the minutiae of such matters than I.
 
Last edited:
Top