HuggingFace ran GLM locally. K3 wasn't an option since the weights aren't released and I guess HuggingFace didn't want to use Kimi's servers.
Artificial Intelligence thread
- Thread starter 9dashline
- Start date
I don't think this is the flex that they think it is. An AI model that was trained to be safe and productive for public consumption...resulted to be safe and productive, no 15 year old is going to used it to hack into cartoons sites.
I think if I have the resources for fine-tuning Kimi or GLM or even DeepSeek on being cyber weapons building exploits I think they will be pretty good ones.
The model did pretty good in defense.I think if I have the resources for fine-tuning Kimi or GLM or even DeepSeek on being cyber weapons building exploits I think they will be pretty good ones.
Just imagine that Kimi would had score 20/20 in the exploit category, you know what would be the headline?
"Irresponsible Xi (because of course is always Xi) released a cybersecurity nuke in the world"
This is a good thing. As long as they convince themselves that US is way ahead, then there should be no reason to ban the open source models. I think at this point, it's more likely they entity list Chinese models and just advise companies to not use it rather than anything else.
As for CAISI, it is entirely possible that by using mythos, it can handle the hardest cyber security test better. After all, Mythos is a huge model. China itself is likely to have closed source model that can do cyber a lot better than K3
EQ-Bench 4 came out, Kimi K3 is tied with Fable 5 for highest Emotional Intelligence, while still leapfrogging everyone else including Fable in terms of Creative Writing....
This is most likely judged by another LLM. So, I am not sure how reliable this kind of judgement is. Creative writing is extremely subjective and impossible to judge like this.
I mean, there is actually a very important metric when it come to creative writing that only a few LLM pass, DSv4 Flash does but I'm pretty sure Kimi won't ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
Certainly as CEO of Nvidia, the largest AI processor manufacturer in the world, Jensen must include business as a consideration. But that's business is not what his post was about.
As he said, this is his first post.
And he chose it to make a major policy statement on the importance of open models.
For these specific policy reasons:
- strengthen safety and cybersecurity,
- accelerate innovation and diffusion,
- and enable sovereignty.
Both are a direct challenge to Bessent's attempt at control via Entity Lists, etc to protect America's investments in Anthropic, OpenAI, etc closed models, their associated pricing power and their USG-only backdoors.
The world is looking forward to the agenda for the US-China AI talks this September.