2025 Israel - Iranian conflict

TPenglake

Junior Member
Registered Member
I'm not expert on weapons, so this is just a layman consulting youtube for knowledge and this guy says penetrating Fordow, in short, will require at the very least 1/3rd of America's bunker buster arsenal, which they may not be willing to expend.


So now that we're a week in I like many eithers jumped to some far fetched conclusions when this all brokeout and of course being just a guy who casually follows this stuff rather than a professional, most of my conclusions turned out to be wrong.

This hasn't become a quagmire yet, so we can gleen that Israel still has two core objectives so far. Destruction of Iran's nuclear program and regime change. With respect to the former, my main reference is the aforementioned video which says that even with US involvement, it'll hardly be a walk in the park. The only real way to knock out the nuclear sites for good would be a ground invasion or for Sayeret Matkal to basically be flown to their objective 1000 km deep into Iranian territory, fighting through whatever security they encounter which will at the very least be brigade sized, blast through multiple layers of reinforced doors, all with very minimal hope of extraction. Yeah if Rambo was given this mission in part 2 he would've said, "Nah fam, hard labor life for me!"

As for regime change, I know reddit is not a great reference point for anything. But an Iranian dissident has been spreading word on multiple subs sounding the alarm that the strikes are actually radicalizing large sections of the Iran's population, even for those typically anti-regime. Considering that the hardest Iranian dissidents are the more educated English speaking types who are either diaspora or have ties to the diaspora, if even they are expressing this sentiment it probably stands to reason the real public sentiment in Iran is much more extreme. Imo, much like how Russia misjudged the common culture component when fighting the Ukrainians, Israelis and Americans alike took the polls ranking public discontent in Iran at 80% too much at face value as well as the tendency to romanticize those images of life in pre-revolutionary Iran in conjunction with the constant framing of Iran as a successor state to the pre-Islamic Persian Empires. So essentially, taking up the objective of regime change with an orientalist image of Iran being this civilizational state held hostage by a foreign religion and welcoming Israeli as well as American bombs as a form of twisted liberation.

First off, previous mass protests in Iran have always been suppressed not just because of the hardline tactics of the regime, but because no opposition has ever existed in modern Iran to begin with. Seriously, as pathetic as the Venezuelan "coup" was, anyone following the news even casually could at least point to Juan Guaido as an opposition figure, where is Iran's equivalent? Most important of all, yes conditions in Iran have not been great and plenty of people hate the regime, yes there are so called "Persian nationalists." But Iran is only 60% Persian and hosts numerous other ethnic groups. Nobody, even someone's whose born and raised there can possibly know all the cultural makeup of these groups, what they want, and what their idea of "Iranic" is, although it wouldn't be too far fetched to say to some extent as abhorrent as the IRI can be at times, it does provide some semblance of national unity.

But above all, whatever liberation a nation goes through, it has to be homegrown. Israel from the beginning posited itself as Iran's outside liberator. However different Iranians may be and their feelings about religion, they are a righteous people and I'm sure they would have so have choice words for what exactly a nation that treats people lining up for food aid as point black target practice can do with its so called, "liberation."

So in short, yes Iran has sustained heavy casualties. But two objectives set out by the Israelis and neither for the moment seem all that accomplishable. So the ball's still in their court with respect to how long do they want to keep this up.
 

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
I'm not expert on weapons, so this is just a layman consulting youtube for knowledge and this guy says penetrating Fordow, in short, will require at the very least 1/3rd of America's bunker buster arsenal, which they may not be willing to expend.


So now that we're a week in I like many eithers jumped to some far fetched conclusions when this all brokeout and of course being just a guy who casually follows this stuff rather than a professional, most of my conclusions turned out to be wrong.

This hasn't become a quagmire yet, so we can gleen that Israel still has two core objectives so far. Destruction of Iran's nuclear program and regime change. With respect to the former, my main reference is the aforementioned video which says that even with US involvement, it'll hardly be a walk in the park. The only real way to knock out the nuclear sites for good would be a ground invasion or for Sayeret Matkal to basically be flown to their objective 1000 km deep into Iranian territory, fighting through whatever security they encounter which will at the very least be brigade sized, blast through multiple layers of reinforced doors, all with very minimal hope of extraction. Yeah if Rambo was given this mission in part 2 he would've said, "Nah fam, hard labor life for me!"

As for regime change, I know reddit is not a great reference point for anything. But an Iranian dissident has been spreading word on multiple subs sounding the alarm that the strikes are actually radicalizing large sections of the Iran's population, even for those typically anti-regime. Considering that the hardest Iranian dissidents are the more educated English speaking types who are either diaspora or have ties to the diaspora, if even they are expressing this sentiment it probably stands to reason the real public sentiment in Iran is much more extreme. Imo, much like how Russia misjudged the common culture component when fighting the Ukrainians, Israelis and Americans alike took the polls ranking public discontent in Iran at 80% too much at face value as well as the tendency to romanticize those images of life in pre-revolutionary Iran in conjunction with the constant framing of Iran as a successor state to the pre-Islamic Persian Empires. So essentially, taking up the objective of regime change with an orientalist image of Iran being this civilizational state held hostage by a foreign religion and welcoming Israeli as well as American bombs as a form of twisted liberation.

First off, previous mass protests in Iran have always been suppressed not just because of the hardline tactics of the regime, but because no opposition has ever existed in modern Iran to begin with. Seriously, as pathetic as the Venezuelan "coup" was, anyone following the news even casually could at least point to Juan Guaido as an opposition figure, where is Iran's equivalent? Most important of all, yes conditions in Iran have not been great and plenty of people hate the regime, yes there are so called "Persian nationalists." But Iran is only 60% Persian and hosts numerous other ethnic groups. Nobody, even someone's whose born and raised there can possibly know all the cultural makeup of these groups, what they want, and what their idea of "Iranic" is, although it wouldn't be too far fetched to say to some extent as abhorrent as the IRI can be at times, it does provide some semblance of national unity.

But above all, whatever liberation a nation goes through, it has to be homegrown. Israel from the beginning posited itself as Iran's outside liberator. However different Iranians may be and their feelings about religion, they are a righteous people and I'm sure they would have so have choice words for what exactly a nation that treats people lining up for food aid as point black target practice can do with its so called, "liberation."

So in short, yes Iran has sustained heavy casualties. But two objectives set out by the Israelis and neither for the moment seem all that accomplishable. So the ball's still in their court with respect to how long do they want to keep this up.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
It was said that Tian Dan had his spies spread the rumour: "If Yan troops cut the noses of Qi prisoners and put them in the first line, Qi troops will be defeated." Yan troops believed the rumour and cut the noses of the Qi prisoners. The Qi army was enraged at this action and in future battles with Yan refused to surrender because they didn't want to be mistreated.

Tian Dan's spies spread another rumour: "If Yan troops dig up Qi ancestor's graves and dishonour the deceased people, it will be very disheartening." Yan troops again believed the rumour and destroyed Qi graves and burned the dead bodies. The Qi people were again enraged and strongly sought revenge.
Looks like the Mullahs have their work cut out for them. Whether they can turn that energy into something useful is yet to be seen.
 

GulfLander

Major
Registered Member
The first group of 119 Chinese citizens evacuated from Israel arrived in the Egyptian capital Cairo on Friday.
....
The first special flight carrying Chinese citizens evacuated from Iran arrived at Beijing Capital International Airport on Friday afternoon, having departed from Ashgabat, Turkmenistan.
...

China's permanent representative to the United Nations on Friday called for international efforts to promote talks to ease Israeli-Iranian tensions.
 

GulfLander

Major
Registered Member
Increasing Iranians have been arriving at the eastern Turkish border city of Van to seek shelter from the intensifying Israeli strikes as the regional conflict between Iran and Israel shows no sign of de-escalation.
....

Red alert sirens #warning of incoming fire have sent Israelis scrambling to bomb shelters as the conflict between #Iran and #Israel entered its seventh day on June 19, with no signs of de-escalation. Nata, a woman in a bomb shelter in Tel Aviv, told CGTN Stringer that she and her family feel scared by the uncertain situation. They are hoping for a quick end to the conflict.
 

AndrewJ

Junior Member
Registered Member
NYT: China is unlikely and difficult to intervene militarily in this conflict if US intervenes, which indicates its influence is limited in the Middle East. Outsiders will raise questions about the cohesiveness of the Axis of Upheaval. :eek::rolleyes:

A U.S. Attack on Iran Would Show the Limits of China’s Power​

China, which depends on Iran for oil and to counter American influence, has a lot to lose from a wider war. But there’s not much it can do about it.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

China’s efforts, at least in public, have been focused on evacuating more than 1,000 of its citizens from Israel and Iran. “Beijing is prioritizing looking after Chinese citizens and assets in the region rather than any sort of broader diplomatic initiative,” said Julian Gewirtz, who was a senior China policy official at the White House and the State Department during President Joseph R. Biden Jr.’s administration.
“The reality is they don’t actually have the capability to insert Chinese forces to defend Iran’s installations,” said Zack Cooper, a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute in Washington. “What they would prefer to do is very quietly provide some material support, some rhetorical support and maybe some humanitarian aid.”
Both Beijing and Moscow were also seen as bystanders last year when their shared partner, the Assad regime, was overthrown in Syria. Their relative absence raises questions about the cohesiveness of what some in Washington have called the “Axis of Upheaval” — the quartet of China, Russia, Iran and North Korea.
“Nobody is saying, ‘We better call up Beijing and see what they can do here,’ because Beijing has played a purely commercial and economic role,” Ms. Leaf said, describing the attitudes of Middle Eastern officials with whom she has spoken over the years.
 

BillRamengod

Junior Member
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

ADS-B exchange data indicates: Suspected B-2 bomber formation continues trans-Pacific flight westward.
KC-46 tankers HIFI81-82 from Travis AFB, California are providing support to suspected B-2 bomber formation MYTEE21;
KC-46 tankers HIFI83-84 are supporting suspected B-2 bomber formation MYTEE11.

639b1bfbly1i2n5gs6o1yj21690rnh0a.jpg

Backing to Diego Garcia?
 
Top