I said in the first response the 200MWt may be just a coincidence. Maybe it’s NOT, but what I really want to show you is that your reasoning is not solid, even leaving alone analyzing generation of military reactors by civilian reactors generations(I said it’s nothing but X-32 vs. B-737). You can prove your idea by showing more evidence just like what @taxiya did rather than always quoting a single old Soviet case.I just showed you KLT-40S comes from the same parent that also "fathered" OB-650V. If you have the technology for one, you can build the other also. The dimension of ACPR50S also makes sense for a nuclear sub. It's actually more likely China is further along on their military one.
But since you are trying to annoy me. Why don't you tell us then? Do you think they need a new reactor for 095? If they do and it's not a 200 MWt reactor, what will it be? If it's not, then what would they use?