052C/052D Class Destroyers

08182858c5199d31994f3d06d818449b.jpg

I think the tweet refers to the ship I put into the red ellipse above, but LOL just tell me if I misunderstood:
DLXJm5JUMAA1v59.jpg

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!





Dans la base navale de Zhoushan, près de Shanghai, qui appartient à la flotte de l'Est de la marine chinoise, un petit nouveau est là...

Translated from French by
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


In the naval base of Zhoushan, near Shanghai, which belongs to the East of the Chinese Navy fleet, a new kid is here...
 

Lethe

Captain
Type 052D should have been design to carry 2 x ASW

I don't see a problem with only one helicopter on a vessel that is primarily tasked with AAW. If 054B has two helos that should be fine. I will be somewhat disappointed if it doesn't have two (although that would reinforce my belief that a clean-sheet frigate program is also underway).

In any case I think the more pressing task is just to establish a clear path to a larger, new-generation ASW helicopter in the first place, whether based on Z-15 or Z-20. Of course this is already likely well underway, we just haven't seen any evidence of it yet.
 

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
Without number Ürümqi 118 to Dinghai-Yadangshan which host 6 DDG Flotilla but she is for NSF so there for sea trials arriving from the shipyard.
CH Zhoushan nveau 052D.jpg
 

AndrewS

Brigadier
Registered Member
I don't see a problem with only one helicopter on a vessel that is primarily tasked with AAW. If 054B has two helos that should be fine. I will be somewhat disappointed if it doesn't have two (although that would reinforce my belief that a clean-sheet frigate program is also underway).

In any case I think the more pressing task is just to establish a clear path to a larger, new-generation ASW helicopter in the first place, whether based on Z-15 or Z-20. Of course this is already likely well underway, we just haven't seen any evidence of it yet.

Agreed.

Look at the how the Chinese fleet will likely be used.

In a high-intensity conflict, this will be in the Western Pacific where land-based ASW aircraft are better than helicopters.

In a low-intensity conflict, it doesn't make any difference whether a Chinese destroyer or Chinese frigate carries 1 or 2 helicopters.
 

Lethe

Captain
[QUOTE="AndrewS, post: 476212, member: 12012"In a high-intensity conflict, this will be in the Western Pacific where land-based ASW aircraft are better than helicopters.[/quote]

I would regard ASW helicopters and aircraft as complementary capabilities, not in competition with one another. Any hypothetical "high-intensity" conflict is going to involve neutralising some of the most advanced conventional and nuclear submarines ever built, a task that will undoubtedly require a full range of capabilities, from ASW aircraft to helicopters to corvettes, frigates, and one's own submarines, to SURTASS-type vessels and SOSUS-type sonar networks, indeed all forms of intelligence gathering.
 

AndrewS

Brigadier
Registered Member
[QUOTE="AndrewS, post: 476212, member: 12012"In a high-intensity conflict, this will be in the Western Pacific where land-based ASW aircraft are better than helicopters.

I would regard ASW helicopters and aircraft as complementary capabilities, not in competition with one another. Any hypothetical "high-intensity" conflict is going to involve neutralising some of the most advanced conventional and nuclear submarines ever built, a task that will undoubtedly require a full range of capabilities, from ASW aircraft to helicopters to corvettes, frigates, and one's own submarines, to SURTASS-type vessels and SOSUS-type sonar networks, indeed all forms of intelligence gathering.[/QUOTE]

Agreed.

But from a cost versus capability point of view, fixed wing MPA beat helicopters in the western pacific. So why should Chinese frigates and destroyers have more than 1 helicopter?
 

by78

General
Latest from the Dalian shipyard. I see four, maybe five 052D units being fitted out. Is this right, or am I seeing too many?

The 1st and 2nd image depict the same unit. The 3rd image depicts another one. I see three 052Ds in the 4th image. Of course, there could well be overlap.

P.S. In the last photo, you can see carrier Shandong in the background.

EDIT: Ah, never mind. There are only three. My confusion was caused by the 4th photograph: I thought the two units are parallel to each other when in fact they are perpendicular.



23721446788_bac744b8c1_o.jpg

36903932283_c8b9098e70_o.jpg

36863509104_9820f47a0b_o.jpg

37525241426_5ee9bcb46e_o.jpg

23721448098_cf69017a0e_o.jpg
 
Last edited:

Iron Man

Major
Registered Member
But from a cost versus capability point of view, fixed wing MPA beat helicopters in the western pacific. So why should Chinese frigates and destroyers have more than 1 helicopter?
Who says a high intensity conflict will always be within range of land-based fixed-wing ASW? Nobody. Which means that Chinese frigates and destroyers would benefit from having more than 1 helicopter.
 
Top