What the Heck?! Thread (Closed)

Status
Not open for further replies.
it's Breaking News at gazeta.ru right now
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

and the source is NYT
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

By CHRISTOPHER SUPRUN DEC. 5, 2016
Why I Will Not Cast My Electoral Vote for Donald Trump
DALLAS — I am a Republican presidential elector, one of the 538 people asked to choose officially the president of the United States. Since the election, people have asked me to change my vote based on policy disagreements with Donald J. Trump. In some cases, they cite the popular vote difference. I do not think president-elects should be disqualified for policy disagreements. I do not think they should be disqualified because they won the Electoral College instead of the popular vote. However, now I am asked to cast a vote on Dec. 19 for someone who shows daily he is not qualified for the office.

Fifteen years ago, as a firefighter, I was part of the response to the Sept. 11 attacks against our nation. That attack and this year’s election may seem unrelated, but for me the relationship becomes clearer every day.

George W. Bush is an imperfect man, but he led us through the tragic days following the attacks. His leadership showed that America was a great nation. That was also the last time I remember the nation united. I watch Mr. Trump fail to unite America and drive a wedge between us.

Mr. Trump goes out of his way to attack the cast of “Saturday Night Live” for bias. He tweets day and night, but waited two days to offer sympathy to the Ohio State community after an attack there. He does not encourage civil discourse, but chooses to stoke fear and create outrage.

This is unacceptable. For me, America is that shining city on a hill that Ronald Reagan envisioned. It has problems. It has challenges. These can be met and overcome just as our nation overcame Sept. 11.

The United States was set up as a republic. Alexander Hamilton provided a blueprint for states’ votes. Federalist 68 argued that an Electoral College should determine if candidates are qualified, not engaged in demagogy, and independent from foreign influence. Mr. Trump shows us again and again that he does not meet these standards. Given his own public statements, it isn’t clear how the Electoral College can ignore these issues, and so it should reject him.

I have poured countless hours into serving the party of Lincoln and electing its candidates. I will pour many more into being more faithful to my party than some in its leadership. But I owe no debt to a party. I owe a debt to my children to leave them a nation they can trust.

Mr. Trump lacks the foreign policy experience and demeanor needed to be commander in chief. During the campaign more than 50 Republican former national security officials and foreign policy experts co-signed a letter opposing him. In their words, “he would be a dangerous president.” During the campaign Mr. Trump even said Russia should hack Hillary Clinton’s emails. This encouragement of an illegal act has troubled many members of Congress and troubles me.

Hamilton also reminded us that a president cannot be a demagogue. Mr. Trump urged violence against protesters at his rallies during the campaign. He speaks of retribution against his critics. He has surrounded himself with advisers such as Stephen K. Bannon, who claims to be a Leninist and lauds villains and their thirst for power, including Darth Vader. “Rogue One,” the latest “Star Wars” installment, arrives later this month. I am not taking my children to see it to celebrate evil, but to show them that light can overcome it.

Gen. Michael T. Flynn, Mr. Trump’s pick for national security adviser, has his own checkered past about rules. He installed a secret internet connection in his Pentagon office despite rules to the contrary. Sound familiar?

Finally, Mr. Trump does not understand that the Constitution expressly forbids a president to receive payments or gifts from foreign governments. We have reports that Mr. Trump’s organization has business dealings in Argentina, Bahrain, Taiwan and elsewhere. Mr. Trump could be impeached in his first year given his dismissive responses to financial conflicts of interest. He has played fast and loose with the law for years. He may have violated the Cuban embargo, and there are reports of improprieties involving his foundation and actions he took against minority tenants in New York. Mr. Trump still seems to think that pattern of behavior can continue.

The election of the next president is not yet a done deal. Electors of conscience can still do the right thing for the good of the country. Presidential electors have the legal right and a constitutional duty to vote their conscience. I believe electors should unify behind a Republican alternative, an honorable and qualified man or woman such as Gov. John Kasich of Ohio. I pray my fellow electors will do their job and join with me in discovering who that person should be.

Fifteen years ago, I swore an oath to defend my country and Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic. On Dec. 19, I will do it again.
 

taxiya

Brigadier
Registered Member
This news really deserves the name "what the heck".
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


It seems the brain does not control the mouth. Not only is it the case of Johnson himself, but the British government as a whole. If the Foreign Secretary's words do not represent the government's position, whose words do? Next time, the Prime Ministers' words do not represent the government?
 

AssassinsMace

Lieutenant General
This news really deserves the name "what the heck".
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


It seems the brain does not control the mouth. Not only is it the case of Johnson himself, but the British government as a whole. If the Foreign Secretary's words do not represent the government's position, whose words do? Next time, the Prime Ministers' words do not represent the government?


Yeah I love how Boris Johnson tried to compare the superiority of Great Britain with China by how more countries have embraced the English language than Chinese. Yeah China didn't put a gun to people's head and order them to speak only Chinese. The British fined people for every word not spoken in English on their own lands the British colonized. I've heard British spins on the Opium Wars that are completely the opposite of the truth. I wouldn't be surprised if Boris was taught people learned English because their culture is so naturally appealing.
 

kwaigonegin

Colonel
This news really deserves the name "what the heck".
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


It seems the brain does not control the mouth. Not only is it the case of Johnson himself, but the British government as a whole. If the Foreign Secretary's words do not represent the government's position, whose words do? Next time, the Prime Ministers' words do not represent the government?

I don't get the negative feedbacks... Maybe I'm in the minority here but I don't think he is entirely wrong. Saudi IS conducting a proxy war in Yemen and other parts of ME. To not realized that is very naive to say the least.
 

taxiya

Brigadier
Registered Member
I don't get the negative feedbacks... Maybe I'm in the minority here but I don't think he is entirely wrong. Saudi IS conducting a proxy war in Yemen and other parts of ME. To not realized that is very naive to say the least.
My negativity was not aiming at him saying the truth which I agree.

The negativity is aiming at him speaking against the government policy which is to avoid saying anything negative towards SA at this moment. He is a member of the government, so he has a duty to walk and talk in line of the government. He is not a journalist or ordinary somebody. Simply put, a soldier attacking the enemy without the order of his commander (when communication is available and clear) is equal to desertion.
 

delft

Brigadier
I don't get the negative feedbacks... Maybe I'm in the minority here but I don't think he is entirely wrong. Saudi IS conducting a proxy war in Yemen and other parts of ME. To not realized that is very naive to say the least.
I just heard someone say on BBC Radio 4 News that Boris was wrong because Saudi Arabia was very helpful in the war against Assad which obviously is one of the proxy wars! :D
BBC is funny.
 

delft

Brigadier
:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:BBC is not the only one to be funny. While listening to BBC I also read on the BBC website in this article:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

this fragment:
But Mr Kerry appeared to downplay the talks saying: "I know people are tired of these meetings, I'm tired of these meetings.

"But what am I supposed to do? Go home and have a nice weekend in Massachusetts, while people are dying? Sit there in Washington and do nothing?"

He described the conflict in Aleppo as the worst "since World War Two itself".
He never heard about Vietnam where US support for the dictator Ngo Dinh Diem led to twenty years of war and the death of more than two million people?
 

Blackstone

Brigadier
:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:BBC is not the only one to be funny. While listening to BBC I also read on the BBC website in this article:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

this fragment:

He never heard about Vietnam where US support for the dictator Ngo Dinh Diem led to twenty years of war and the death of more than two million people?
What of it? Sovereign states almost always mouth high ideals and moralistic hyperbole, while doing whatever it takes in pursuance of their national interests, even if their actions directly contradict what they say they believe. Least we forget, westerners didn't invent the strategy and aren't alone in practicing it today.
 

SteelBird

Colonel
How I feel this guy would shoot himself in no time.
OOwZY5D.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top