Indian Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

aksha

Captain
The growth of the Indian Army's helicopter inventory

The Army Aviation Corps (AAC) of the Indian Army (IA) is just shy of being three decades old. In that period, it has probably become the busiest corps in the IA having to serve in a variety of terrain supporting a whole gamut of operations.

AAC is particularly crucial to maintaining India's dominance in the Siachen Glacier and supporting small unit operations in mountainous terrain. Given that brief, the AAC is always looking to increase the number of helicopters with high altitude capability in its inventory whether it be for reconnaissance and surveillance(RS) roles utility roles, heli-borne insertion or attack.

These varied requirements have served as a peg for the evolution of indigenous helicopter capability in India that is both capable of high altitude operations as well as a mix of roles and will form the bulk of AAC's inventory in the future alongside domestically produced Russian designs given the discussions during Russian President Vladimir Putin's December 2014 visit to India.

AAC of course doesn't only focus on the mountains and given the IA's extensive plans to increase helicopter holdings for its overall strike and pivot corps, AAC's significantly growing inventory may also see the addition of heavy attack helicopters (AHs).

End October 2014 saw the issuance of a request for information (RFI) for RS helicopters for AAC for a third time in just over a decade. This new tender is being advanced under the 'buy and make' category and is in keeping with the Modi government's decision to have the long running RS helicopter procurement met through domestic companies with foreign collaboration under a 'make in India' scheme.

However this time, no specific numbers have been outlined in the tender which is indicative of the fact that AAC's requirements in this category go far beyond merely replacing the around 200 strong but ageing Chetak and Cheetah fleet.

Moreover given that Putin's visit saw India and Russia agreeing to move quickly on having the Russian Ka-226T built in India in a joint venture format with the aim of producing up to 400 helicopters a year, it is abundantly clear that a major part of this procurement will be in the form of domestically built Ka-226Ts.

To meet immediate operational requirements on account of the need to retire some Cheetahs and Chetaks as soon as possible, an initial batch of helicopters will come in flyaway condition from Kamov's facility in Russia.

The rest will however have to be built in India and the Russians are currently on the lookout for a domestic partner for the same and they may even tie up with HAL for this purpose. However given that HAL is also progressing its own light utility helicopter (LUH) design, it remains to be seen whether it will also end up as a JV partner for the Ka-226T. Interestingly though, in mid-October HAL issued its own RFI for selecting a JV partner for RS helicopters. It is also worth noting that the AAC tender has a 30 per cent localization content clause within 4 years of signature of contract.

Now the Ka-226T along with the Airbus Helicopter's AS 550 C3 Fennec had been downselected in the last tender having met the revised technical and operational parameters specified in it. So both the Ka-226T and AS 550 C3 in any case have qualified the IA's requirements for a RS helicopter that can be used for directing artillery fire, carry small body of troops/quick reaction teams for special missions, aerial photography, scouting roles in conjunction with AHs, airborne forward air controller (FAC) functions, casualty evacuation (CASEVAC), NBC monitoring, as a platform for ESM, ECM and ECCM etc and to provide dynamic response during aid to civil authorities. Interestingly Airbus Helicopter may still tie up with perhaps the Tata's hoping to bid with the AS 550 for this latest tender, despite the fact that the government to government dealings during Putin's visit effectively puts the Russians in the lead.

Now, the Ka-226T sports two Turbomeca Arrius 2G1 (2G1) engines which are more powerful than the Rolls-Royce 250C engines that power the baseline Ka-26 . Each 2G1 provides 670 shp, increasing the service ceiling to over 6500 metres, providing improved high altitude and high temperature operation. Given HAL's long association with Turbomeca and co-development of the Shakti engine family, the 2G1 will probably be easily localized in India with even follow-ons perhaps being developed in partnership with Turbomeca.

The Ka-226T also has new avionics with multifunctional displays (MFD), automatic control system, navigation system and radar. It can be equipped with a hoist system, a helicopter sling that can carry up to 1.5 tons, a searchlight and an additional external fuel tank. For search and rescue (SAR) missions, the Ka-226T can also be equipped with a medical module among the many interchangeable modules that fit into its rear. The helicopter's transmission system is made largely from composite material and in layout it has Kamov's characteristic coaxial rotors of composite design, making the Ka-226T rather manoeuvrable in mountainous areas. Top speed is around 200 km/hr and the Ka-226T can carry nine passengers or about 1.4 tons of cargo internally.

Meanwhile HAL has already started work on a 600 plus acre greenfield project in Gubbi in Karnataka to manufacture LUHs. This facility is said to have the capability to manufacture 50-60 3 ton LUHs annually and seems to be tailored to producing HAL's own LUH design which is expected to enter flight testing in mid- 2015 with certification sometime in 2016. The first LUH ground test vehicle(GTV) recently underwent engine ground runs. HAL is now expected to churn out three flying prototypes in quick succession. The speed with which HAL is actually able to do this will decide just how much of the 187 unit RS helicopter order 'allocated' to it earlier by the Ministry of Defence (MoD) will actually materialize. The LUH of course is quite contemporary with comparable specs to the Ka-226T although its layout is more conventional.

Even as the precise fate of the LUH design remains unclear, HAL's flagship indigenous rotary offering the Dhruv advanced light helicopter (ALH) however is going from strength to strength in AAC. The IA is now taking deliveries of both the Dhruv Mk III as well as the Rudra AH variant. The Dhruv MkIII is now even being used in highly specialized roles along the line of Control to intercept terrorists as is evidenced by the workings of the 202 Army Aviation Squadron also known as the Soaring Gideons. Units such as these employ the Dhruv's advanced avionics to stealthily and quickly reach landing zones employing day/night nap of the earth flying in the mountains. The Dhruv's advanced communication systems also facilitate real time data sharing with other nodes such as Command HQ and RSTA assets. Today almost 80 Dhruvs have been inducted into the IA with many more on contract.
 

aksha

Captain
continued from previous post due to 1000 character limit

Impressed with the Dhruv platform's avionics and versatility, AAC has begun inducting the first flights of the Rudra AH earlier known as the Weapon System Integrated Dhruv Mk IV. The IA wants the Rudra's airborne firepower in 'contact' battle scenarios thereby constituting a third another manoeuvre arm with lethal strike capability. Sixty Rudras are currently on order with the first flight being formed in Bangalore.

While employing the basic Dhruv layout, Rudra has a higher percentage of carbon-carbon composite materials to achieve weight reduction. It has commonality in avionics with the Dhruv Mk III, sporting a NVG-compatible cockpit with MFDs, dual flight controls and an autopilot. The avionics suite like the standard Dhruv also includes GPS, FLIR, HF/UHF communications radio, IFF, Doppler navigation and a radio altimeter. An EO (Electro-optic) pod helmet-mounted sight and fixed sights ensure accurate targeting with onboard weapons.

Rudra however has a slightly higher rated version of the Shakti turboshaft with each of its two Shakti engines delivering maximum continuous power of 1,067kW as opposed to 1,000 kW in the Dhruv Mk III. The Shakti engines give the helicopter a sustained max speed of 270 kmph and enable it to fly to over 20000 feet, thereby making it very useful for engaging targets in the mountains in a variety of scenarios. This the Rudra will do with either a Nexter THL-20 chin mounted gun turret housing a 20 mm M621 cannon, 70 mm rockets, air launched air to ground/ anti-tank missiles and will even air to air missiles for use against UAVs and perhaps other helicopters.

The Rudra's scope of employment is obviously not tailored merely to the mountains but also includes a very important anti-armour component in the plains. Indeed the first sixty helicopters are likely to be assigned to the IA's three Strike Corps for warfare in the plains, based respectively at Bhopal, Ambala and Mathura. The next flights will then head for the new Mountain Strike Corps based in Panagarh.

But AAC's appetite for a light AH capability potent in both the plains and mountains is not to be wetted merely by the Rudra. The IA's initial plans are to have at least 30 helicopters assigned to each of its 13 Corps, with one-third of the RS variety (Ka-226T/HAL LUH), one-third of the utility variety ( HAL Dhruv Mk III) and one-third of the AH variety. Now the ten AHs assigned to each Corps will not only be the Rudra but could instead be HAL's Light Combat Helicopter (LCH) for which the IA has indicated a requirement of at least 114 units. In fact AAC's growth in the years ahead can be gauged by the fact that the IA intends to have an AAC 'Brigade' with all its strike and pivot Corps in the medium term.

The LCH meanwhile has entered a decisive phase in its testing schedule and is expected to attain Initial Operational Clearance(IOC) by September 2015. The 5.8 tonne LCH is a 'true' 7000 metre altitude capable AH and can provide air defence amidst mountains, air escort, close air support in urban warfare scenarios and anti-armour capability. While the MBDA Pars 3 LR was said to have been shortlisted to initially equip the Rudra and perhaps the LCH, there has been considerable progress in DRDO's Helina air launched anti-tank missile project and with a new Imaging Infrared Seeker (IIR), the Helina is now able to engage targets out to 10 km. 2015 may see the Helina heading into production.

As AAC eagerly waits for the LCH to enter production, the IA has also put up a request for some 39 Apache AH-64E's to the MoD. While it was decided in 2012 that all future AH acquisitions will go to the IA, the Indian Air Force (IAF) managed to convince the Government that it should be allowed to retain the initial batch of 22 AH-64s that it has sought to buy from Boeing since that procurement move pre-dated the 2012 MoD decision. The IA therefore has put up its own case for additional AH-64E's apparently impressed by the helicopter's network centric capability, payload and reputation. However it remains to be seen whether even the IAF will have its Apache proposal cleared anytime soon.

AAC's rivalry with the IAF's transport wing will also increase in the years ahead however, since the IA intends to have a flight of at least five fixed wing aircraft assigned to each of its regional commands. Moreover both the IA and the IAF are likely to receive variants of the Rustom-2 UAV in the future as well. It is clear that the IAF's fond hope that 'small air forces' will not grow under other services is clearly dashed with the Indian Navy having broken away from that cocoon year's ago and now even the IA is following suit for good measure.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

aksha

Captain
What is the actual story on this because I am reading a political spin in the way selected words were used? The Defence Minister said difficulties were faced "during the course of procurement" which suggest to me an internal procurement issue. In contrast, if the delay was caused by foreign vendors, the words "during the course" would have been left out. A cursory reading of the text might imply a delay caused by foreign suppliers but the construction of the sentence may suggest a different story to it.

"In a written reply to Dr Chandan Mitra, Parrikar said the delay is because of difficulties faced by MDL during the course of procurement of materials from foreign vendors."


here goes
French supplier faltering, deadlines breached; Scorpene may take another hit says defence shipyard


Read more at:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

The alarm bells have gone off. After nine long years of waiting, the Indian Navy couldn't have expected a worse time for it to happen.


Suffering from two debilitating underwater losses within a year and tardy acquisition process, its only hope, Project 75 involving the construction of six Scorpene submarines based on transfer of technology from the French firm DCNS, is on the verge of taking a hit, resulting into the fourth straight extension of delivery deadline.

The Mumbai-based Mazagon Dock Limited (MDL), which is building the boats with DCNS' assistance, has stated that critical spares which were to be supplied by DCNS are yet to materialise despite the deadlines expiring. What makes the crisis worse is the fact that these spares impact the first boat in all sections and thereby the lack of availability is expected to hit progress in construction. The present delivery schedule was worked out in November 2012 and orders were placed accordingly. This schedule stipulated that the first submarine would get commissioned into the navy by September 2016 and the remaining five at intervals of nine months after that. It is this schedule which now stands breached.


Meanwhile, the MDL has completed the construction of the six hulls for the six boats and has made headway into outfitting work on the first.



you see pics of the indian scorpenes
7a31Gk3.jpg
 
Last edited:

A Bar Brother

Junior Member
Which SOS button? The T-50 or FGFA button but according to this article they are now the same? Lol.

IAF wants early deliveries of the PAKFA while waiting for the FGFA to finish development. Of course, there is no mention of whether it will be Stage-1 or Stage-2, regardless, it will be a significant improvement over the Su-30MKI and Rafale.

This is similar to how the IAF ordered 18 Su-30Ks in 1996 before placing orders for the Su-30MKI in 2000. There was a plan to order more Su-30Ks, but was canceled.

Aksha's SOS refers to the depleting squadrons in the IAF. Early induction of PAKFA this decade, instead of waiting for the FGFA until the next decade is a good move, both in terms of stemming squadron depletion as well as getting the FGFA operational sooner, like it was for the MKI.
 

Brumby

Major
IAF wants early deliveries of the PAKFA while waiting for the FGFA to finish development.

Is there a change in procurement plan as my understanding is that India's plan was to acquire the FGFA sometime starting around 2022/2023 (I think) rather than taking on board initially T-50's? Certainly not immediately like in 2016 as the article seems to suggest, as that would be a curved ball.

Aksha's SOS refers to the depleting squadrons in the IAF. Early induction of PAKFA this decade, instead of waiting for the FGFA until the next decade is a good move, both in terms of stemming squadron depletion as well as getting the FGFA operational sooner, like it was for the MKI.

The main issue with the depleting numbers coming from the MIG-21 retirement was the failure of the LCA program to meet program timetable. The Rafale purchase was a supplement towards the depletion pool and a bridge in capability gap until the introduction of the FGFA. This latest plan to bring forward the FGFA program is fundamentally unsound both strategically and tactically. The FGFA was meant to be the high end of the force structure mix and the current depletion is coming from the low end of that mix. Strategically it is a mismatch. Tactically, any attempt to bring forward the FGFA timetable is fraught with delivery risk and will lack the numbers to be meaningful in any case to bridge the expected depletion (assuming the Russians even have a finished product and will play ball).

The right thing to do is to kick start the LCA rather than continue to fiddle with it with new technologies. HAL needs to produce the planes in numbers. I don't understand why after so many years, production still haven't ramp up. Additionally, India needs to make up its mind on the Rafale rather than eight years of negotiations and still counting. Staring at depletion numbers but with no sound plan is mismanagement. Resorting to T-50's to make up the numbers to me is both pure desperation and fantasy.
 

Zool

Junior Member
The right thing to do is to kick start the LCA rather than continue to fiddle with it with new technologies. HAL needs to produce the planes in numbers. I don't understand why after so many years, production still haven't ramp up. Additionally, India needs to make up its mind on the Rafale rather than eight years of negotiations and still counting. Staring at depletion numbers but with no sound plan is mismanagement. Resorting to T-50's to make up the numbers to me is both pure desperation and fantasy.

There is still a fair bit of testing to go to get LCA into proper IOC status. But you are right, in my opinion, that the Indian Government & Forces should put more emphasis in bring LCA Mk 1 forward. That begins with firm orders, larger order, from the MOD so that funds can be allocated toward additional manufacturing infrastructure.

LCA Mk 1 is a good start for India in building the aerospace side of it's MIC. It doesn't have to be the best aircraft in the world, just adequate to fulfill it's task of replacing the MIG-21's as the low-end of the IAF fighter mix. As that happens, India can make strides to more fully indigenize the aircraft with additional Indian made components.
 

aksha

Captain
Budget 2015: Financing India’s Defence
An overview of what Budget 2015 delivered, or did not, for the defence sector

Defence budgets are the best way to judge whether a government is putting its money where its mouth is, as also precisely which mouths it is putting money into. In that context defence allocations for 2015-16 show a clear trend towards a quickening naval buildup in the Indian Ocean Region (IOR) and push for faster border infrastructure, both of which dovetail with the strategic goal of pushing back China from India’s sphere of influence. However capital expenditure allocations for the Indian Air force (IAF), India’s most capital using service do not show any appreciable increase indicating that the government remains lukewarm to the Dassault Rafale proposal. The allocation for DRDO has remained more or less the same from last year, showing an increase in the revenue component and a decrease in the capital head, indicating that the government isn’t yet voting decisively in favour of ‘designed and developed in India’ as the main constituent of ‘Make in India’.

Nevertheless, the fact that money is also being made available for handholding industry R&D efforts is encouraging. Overall, despite the near 8 percent jump from the last budget, defence spend continues to languish at less than 2 percent of GDP and 13 percent of the total budgetary outlay for the year ahead i.e 2015-16.

The Indian Navy’s (IN’s) warship build plans are certainly being boosted with the budgeted capital outlay for ‘naval fleet’ in 2015-16 marking a 33 percent jump over the budget estimate for 2014-15 and a near 80 percent jump over the revised estimate for the same period. Clearly money is being forwarded for more naval platforms including India’s first indigenous aircraft carrier (IAC), INS Vikrant II under construction at Cochin Shipyard. In 2014, the Cabinet Committee on Security (CCS) gave the go ahead for Phase-2 of the IAC project that includes fitment of equipment on board the ship. The increased allocation for ‘naval fleet’ reflects that. It probably also reflects the commencement of a new seven ship stealth frigate build program. The thrust now is clearly towards establishing a pre-eminent naval posture in the IOR precluding the possibility of China someday leveraging its emerging commercial web in the region to threaten India from its south i.e from the seas.

Now even as India’s southern maritime domain is being strengthened, the push back against China’s salami slicing tactics along the Northern borders is also on display in this year’s budget. The capital outlay for Indian Army (IA) construction programmes, though marginally lower than the revised estimate for 2014-15, is higher than the budgetary allocation from the same period. Thus indicating a consistent desire to complete China centric projects such as new bases, ammunition stores and other staging infrastructure. Moreover the IA’s salary budget (easily more than the total equipment spend by the IN and IAF combined) has shown an increase of around Rs 5000 crores reflecting manpower accretions for new offensive formations meant for deployment on the China front.

However worries about the China front have not led to the government expediting the IAF proposal to purchase 126 Dassault Rafale fighters under the MMRCA program. The capital outlay for ‘Aircraft & Aero-engines’ for the IAF is only around Rs 18000 crores for 2014-16 and it is believed that a payment of Rs 15,000 crores would have to be made if any deal with Dassault is signed. Given the IAF’s on-going capital expenses, this means that there is as yet no deal with Dassault for the Rafale. Of course, if a deal were indeed to be made in the coming months it would probably get reflected in the revised estimates for 2015-16. Nevertheless it is interesting to note that the budgetary allocation made this year for aircraft and engines for the IAF is some 40 percent lower than the IAF’s actual spend under this head in 2013-14. Overall the IAF continues to be the heaviest spender on equipment but the IN is now slowly catching up. The IA of course continues to hog the overall budget on account of revenue expenditure but is number three on the capital side of things. In the years ahead the IA will have to completely indigenize its pool of equipment if it wants greater bang for buck.

For DRDO, this year’s budget is essentially neutral in that it more or less preserves the jump in allocation it received in the Modi government’s interim budget last year after years of stagnancy. However while its capital outlay has increased from the revised estimate for 2014-15, it is actually less than the budgetary allocation made in the same period. DRDO per se won’t be unhappy with this year’s budget, but for it to make faster progress in crucial areas such as seeker development, aero-engines and directed energy weapons, it would need more manpower and test facilities than it has now.

Be that as it may, this year’s budget does allocate Rs 144 crore for ‘Prototype Development Under Make Procedure’ which indicates that programs such as the Tactical Communication System which is being competed for by private and public consortia and involves the govt bearing 80 percent of the cost of prototyping, are moving forward. Indian industry has been particularly lobbying for the quicker rollout of these programs which hold great promise for it to climb the value chain in defence manufacturing with lower than usual risk.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

aksha

Captain
U.S. To Re-Enter Indian Light Copter Contest
90LclBo.jpg

India's third attempt at procuring 197 light reconnaissance/surveillance helicopters (RSH) for the Indian Army and IAF kicks off this month, and if two attempts across the last decade haven't thrown up enough dust, indications are that this third effort is all set to be even more interesting.

The two finalists in the last abortive attempt, Airbus Helicopters with theAS550 C3 Fennecand Kamov with theKa-226T2 Sergeiwill both compete through respective build partners in India (the latter has a seemingly separate proposal to build the Sergei and Mi-17 V-5s in India.)

U.S. firm Bell Helicopter, which competed in the original effort (that began in 2003) has signalled that it will be re-entering the competition this year through local partners. Livefist learns that Bell Helicopter and an Indian partner will field theBell 407GTin the new RSH contest.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Top