JF-17/FC-1 Fighter Aircraft thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

Zahid

Junior Member
Re: JF-17/FC-1 Fighter Aircraft thread 2009

There, there, no need to get emotional. Let us not kick the temperature upto the point where again mods would close the thread. Some posters would be very happy if that happens.

There is absolutely no need to touch the engine issue for now. It is my sincere appeal to fellow Pakistanis on this forum to not rise to the bait. Please.
 

taimikhan

New Member
Re: JF-17/FC-1 Fighter Aircraft thread 2009

What do you mean, absorb the current one? FYI, China is providing Pakistan batch kits to assemble the JF17 including the avionics, and radar. There is no tech transfer of the avionics. Pakistan won't "absorb" anything except building some sections of the air frame.

Provide some proof that Pakistan is "absorbing" the CHINESE avionics/radar! Or stop adding to the b.s. in this thread again. Last time, you guys B.S.ed that Pakistan can re-engineer the FC1 to fit a Western engine, without any proof whatsoever!

Stop the B.S!! :mad:

It would be better if you keep the BS BS BS part to yourself and have a decent civilized discussion.

Absorb the current one means, to induct the first batch of JF-17s, get used to them, get to know, get to know the capability of the machine, the problems, the deficiencies, areas for improvement and then go back to the drawing board if need arises and redesign it. As per many reliable sources, the design of JF-17 has been frozen till the 150 mark. After that, will be seen if further design and improvements required or not.

And again telling, that JF-17 was designed with keeping in mind a future possible engine change if required, as Russian may give us problem, China knows that too, that is why they have gone for the manufacturing of WS-13 engine. Pakistan & China are both partners in this program, and China knows what are our limitations and problems in regard for engines, so they must have discussed the possibility of a future engine change and both will work onto it, if in case such an event comes. But as for now the Russians have given assurances and a more powerful variant is expected from them, PAF is no mood for an engine change. Western is out of question for now and in near future also. So for PAF Russian and Chinese engines both will work perfectly, and PAF is happy for now.

And now as for airframe, PAC will manufacture some parts of the JF-17 for now and will gradually increase the airframe production to 100% in 2-3 years time period. Similarly, avionics part would also be increased with the passing time. It may not be a ToT by Chinese in the avionics field, but a ToPT would surely be there, plus except for first 50, the next batch avionics is not confirmed yet. Reports of french avionics deal is in the air and picture will get cleared in the next few months time period. So if PAF goes for french deal, we won;t be needing Chinese ToT for just 50 airframes avionics.

Would end with a note that there is no need to get emotional and start using derogatory remarks, JF-17 is a modular design, and it was made with an understanding by both China and Pakistan that both can use whatever they want in their version of FC-1/JF-17 as per their requirement and it includes avionics and engine both.

Just for a small example, check out the FC-1 Pt#06 and see the difference in the antennas on the upper body and under the nose compared to the JF-17 Pt#04. Both are different communication equipment. JF-17 uses western ones, while the Chinese FC-1 Pt-06 has Chinese communication equipment.
 

yehe

Junior Member
Re: JF-17/FC-1 Fighter Aircraft thread 2009

I dont want to get into this argument toodeep, but I dont think pakistan for now can do the change of engine by its own, since the fact is that pakistan have never done anything similer before, and lack the experience needed for upgrade a modern sophiscated aircraft, but they certainly can learn how and get the ability if they really decide to do this.

Anyway, this is a 50/50 joint venture, not a usual licensed production, neither side can just abandon the other, its about bussiness.
 
Last edited:

flyboy2008

New Member
Re: JF-17/FC-1 Fighter Aircraft thread 2009

There, there, no need to get emotional. Let us not kick the temperature upto the point where again mods would close the thread. Some posters would be very happy if that happens.

There is absolutely no need to touch the engine issue for now. It is my sincere appeal to fellow Pakistanis on this forum to not rise to the bait. Please.

The only real emotion here is laughter at some of the claims by your countrymen. While Pakistan has every right to be vigorous and pro-active, you guys also need to stay grounded in reality. It doesn't help anyone when BS claims are made without any substantiation or proof.

I would not be surprised if some here begin to claim Pakistan will purchase the JXX in the next 5-10 years, and "absorb" it within 2-3 years. Yes, it's sunk to this level of absurdity.

Pakistan is receiving generous levels of help by China yet Pakistanis are so ungrateful they make absurd claims that are insulting to the intelligence of Chinese people here. Get a grip, and make some sensible posts, and no one will get offended.
 

bd popeye

The Last Jedi
VIP Professional
Re: JF-17/FC-1 Fighter Aircraft thread 2009

You gents need to cool off. The discussion was fine until the last day or so..

This thread will be closed for 24 hours to allow for cooling off.

Thread closed until 1300GMT 03.24.2010


bd popeye super moderator
 
Last edited:

Engineer

Major
Re: JF-17/FC-1 Fighter Aircraft thread 2009

The burden of proof doesnot lie with me. It is a millitary project with extreme secrecy at this stage and for which you are not going to get much information. Accept the information with a grain of salt---otherwise write whatever you want to write.
Of course the burden of proof lies in you, since you are the one who asserted that JF-17 can use any engine. Claiming that there are proofs and then states nobody gets to see it is not considered as a proof; that would be how pseudoscience work.

As far as I see though, you are making stuffs up, since what you've suggested defies engineering common sense. I think the main problem is that you misinterpreted "modular" as plug-and-play with every single component on the aircraft, whereas the original meaning only applies to avionics.
 

Engineer

Major
Re: JF-17/FC-1 Fighter Aircraft thread 2009

I'd at least like to see a source saying fighters after the 60's aren't designed around the engine, but I doubt such a source even exists. :rolleyes:
 

MastanKhan

Junior Member
Re: JF-17/FC-1 Fighter Aircraft thread 2009

Of course the burden of proof lies in you, since you are the one who asserted that JF-17 can use any engine. Claiming that there are proofs and then states nobody gets to see it is not considered as a proof; that would be how pseudoscience work.


Hi,

I believe that your understanding of my posts is very poor---you are taking too much liberty with what I said---I would love to see my comments if you can post where I stated that JF 17 can use any engine.

You need to stop arguing the point and move ahead with discussion please.

As I stated earlier that paf kamra is very able and capable to make the required changes if need be. There is no reason for any further argument on this subject.
 

taimikhan

New Member
Re: JF-17/FC-1 Fighter Aircraft thread 2009

Hi,

I believe that your understanding of my posts is very poor---you are taking too much liberty with what I said---I would love to see my comments if you can post where I stated that JF 17 can use any engine.

You need to stop arguing the point and move ahead with discussion please.

As I stated earlier that paf kamra is very able and capable to make the required changes if need be. There is no reason for any further argument on this subject.

Mastan Sir, don't sweat about it, leave it. Let them have a field day by thinking what they think.

Simple thing is, JF-17 is a joint venture and PAF had specifically showed its intent of an engine change in future if need arises at the start of the project, whether it be a Chinese engine or a western one, all it matters is, it should be an efficient engine in operational and maintenance sectors, thrust should be appropriate.

The Chinese partner would not say no to this as it is a joint venture and as told above, PAF had told about a future engine change if need arises, and Chinese have no problem with that, as we have money invested in it too, and if we look at our past record with China, we have made many modifications in Chinese equipment bought or manufactured jointly, and China has never said anything about that. Be the F-6s equipped to fire US made A2A missiles, F-7P&PGs equipped with Grifo radars and firing western weapons, Al Khalid tank equipped with Ukrainian engine, other western electronics, LY-60 SAM system integrated with British Type-21 frigates, K-8 being equipped with western engine, and other equipment. They have never said anything in all the above examples and would not say a No in this JF-17 also.

But if someone wishes to bring smiles to their faces that China will say No to it, then let them keep smiling, no worries.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top