PLA Navy news, pics and videos

I

Iron Man

Major
Registered Member
Bltizo said:
The phrasing of your post #1951 made it seem like you thought a large number of 055Xs (whatever each individual may respectively believe that number to be) could only conceivably be produced in a situation where a two tier fleet structure emerges.

If you agree that wasn't what you were conveying then there is no disagreement.


"popular projections for the 055/A's eventual numbers will need to be tempered, since many fans' estimations for the 055 is as a replacement for the 052" --- also made it sound like a large proportion of the individuals who have a position on this issue, are on the side believing 055X will eventually be produced in large numbers due to its intention to replacement of the 052X category.
As far as I remember, Lethe is the one who has brought it up the most often but even he is not fully committed to believe it will happen, and I've considered it as a viable future as well, but I can't recall any substantial number of users who strongly believe in a two tier fleet.



I think I do understand what you mean now, but a few word choices in the original post gave off an impression that you were saying something else.
Click to expand...
I take no responsibility for what you misunderstood, nor do I agree that what I said somehow naturally gives off any impression that I was saying anything other than what I intended to say. If the highlighted part didn't apply to you, then the entire statement didn't apply to you. This isn't rocket science. JFC
 
Blitzo

Blitzo

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
Iron Man said:
I take no responsibility for what you misunderstood, nor do I agree that what I said somehow naturally gives off any impression that I was saying anything other than what I intended to say. If the highlighted part didn't apply to you, then the entire statement didn't apply to you. This isn't rocket science. JFC
Click to expand...

It's alright, it was just a misunderstanding.

It's not like I'm asking you to "admit fault" or "take responsibility" or anything, I just wanted to confirm that my interpretation wasn't your intended meaning.
 
Jura The idiot

Jura The idiot

General
cool tweet
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!





Le porte-avions américain USS Carl Vinson, en mer de Chine méridionale le 10 Février, et un destroyer chinois Type 052D qui surveille de loin.

Translated from French by
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

The American aircraft carrier USS Carl VINSN, in the South China Sea on 10 February, and a Chinese destroyer Type 052D who watches from afar.

DWC0xNNW4AIUFc3.jpg

DWC0y72XUAEPWPn.jpg
 
K

KIENCHIN

Junior Member
Registered Member
Jura said:
cool tweet
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!





Le porte-avions américain USS Carl Vinson, en mer de Chine méridionale le 10 Février, et un destroyer chinois Type 052D qui surveille de loin.

Translated from French by
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

The American aircraft carrier USS Carl VINSN, in the South China Sea on 10 February, and a Chinese destroyer Type 052D who watches from afar.

DWC0xNNW4AIUFc3.jpg

DWC0y72XUAEPWPn.jpg
Click to expand...
The silhouette looks like that of a 052C instead of a 052D, the angle of the bridge and absence of the 25 round HQ10 launcher on top of the hangar is a dead give away.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top