Miscellaneous News

ansy1968

Brigadier
Registered Member
Also, white worshipping is also common among Malaysian Chinese, but it only takes the Taiwan Boba liberal flavour over there. In Singapore there is the "Wannabe Westerner" type among the upper-middle class, but most of the white worshippers are actually still of the Boba type. The tricky part about Boba liberals is that they may speak primarily in Mandarin/dialect, watch only Mandarin TV and listen only to Mandopop etc but may very well be more anti-China than people who appear more Westernized like Christians.
Bro attitude will change as China become more prominent, Being Chinese is beautiful I think I will file a TM on it...lol. The world is changing so fast as we see the return of China Tributary System as most important people and leadership goes to Beijing to kowtow to emperor Xi. :p

I may say those western minded Chinese are the major beneficiaries as respect is finally given and their opinion is sought after as intermediary between the China and the Collective West.
 

Biscuits

Colonel
Registered Member
Does the USA really even know how many nukes China has because for all we know (and maybe what China officially tells the world but reality is bound to be very different as China has no interest in telling the world about Chinese full arsenal unlike Russia and the USA does for some stupid reason), China could already have a few thousand nukes already prepared for use at a moments notice via DF to strike the US homeland within the half hour which I am certain the pentagon knows but Biden obvious is too brain dead to know and the rest of his entourage are too arrogant to worry themselves about the potential dangers of angering a nation whose production ability far outstrips Russias which is already given the USA a massive headache (but don’t tell them that because they ultra dumb and fail at basic logic)
It might not be that easy for Washington's spies to know China's nuclear roster, because China keeps only several hundred warheads on high readiness while most of their arsenal is separated from the warheads during periods of "low tension". So it's not as simple as just finding 1 middle level hanjian who would divulge the arsenal's size and specifics, the whole arsenal's specs might only be known by the very few people that are in charge of uniting the warheads and platforms during danger.

In the past, China may have wanted to win a nuclear war (Mao's plans) using strategic ambiguity, fast delivery platforms and missile defense as a contingency. But with China as the world's largest economy which neither Mao nor Deng could have predicted, modern day China just has too much to lose to seriously consider aggressively using nukes on the capitalist world.

Using nukes would be trading down, same reason Biden would not threaten to use nukes against Russia either, because Russia is smaller than USA.

However, there are also no benefits to dropping strategic ambiguity, because it keeps China's enemies on their toes. Once ambiguity is lost, it can't be regained.
 

manqiangrexue

Brigadier
why are the Anglo Americans so keen for a war against china whereas they’re so hesitant to go to war against Russia? And it’s not like Anglo slow learners in leadership haven’t been to war against china. They did, and failed in their objectives such that it resulted in the maxim before the gulf war to “never start a land war in Asia “.

Answer is nukes, and all the more reason why China needs more nukes to remind the aging boomer relationship that duck and cover could once again become a part of American life…just like their childhoods.
I fully support China expanding its nuclear arsenal, but that's not the only or even the main reason why America seems more hesitant to go to war with Russian than with China. Firstly, Chinese are more soft-spoken and pragmatic, so actual conflict liklihood is much lower, giving the US more room to act tough without actually risking war. Secondly, if the US goes to MAD with Russia, it sees that as a bad deal for itself; because they essentially lost 330M people that had military, technology and diplomatic advantage to take out 140M people who had nukes and oil. That's a bad trade. But against China, MAD means the US traded 330M people in decline past their prime who've already enjoyed being a global hegemon for several decades to take out 1.4B people who are fast rising in every aspect of global power and are just about to enjoy thier turn ruling the world. That's a good trade even if it is an extremely painful one to make. As we say in Chinese, the barefoot pauper has nothing to fear from the well-to-do man wearing expensive shoes. Basically, the more desperate one with less to lose will be more agreeable to MAD. USA vs Russia, that's Russia. USA vs China, that's USA. Anyway, I posted on this before:
 
Last edited:

Rafi

Junior Member
Registered Member
Bro attitude will change as China become more prominent, Being Chinese is beautiful I think I will file a TM on it...lol. The world is changing so fast as we see the return of China Tributary System as most important people and leadership goes to Beijing to kowtow to emperor Xi. :p

I may say those western minded Chinese are the major beneficiaries as respect is finally given and their opinion is sought after as intermediary between the China and the Collective West.

I think it happens everywhere there are people like this in every country, socialy ostracised people will think twice before behaving in this way.
 

birdlikefood

Junior Member
Registered Member
Funny thing is, is that one way to get crucified in China, is to pull stupid stunts like this and tree all it to the Chinese public. Unlike in the USA where nothing much would happen to the perpetrators other then a like scolding, things like this could become life and death in China. Chinese Netizens can literally destroy the hell out of the offender when they unite and literally turn that offender into a literal outcast, basically do a edp445 on that person (basically a person whose mistakes online lead him to be cancelled basically everywhere to this day). This kind of unity is something that the USA government could only dream of having
The Chinese government's control of public opinion is similar to the optimization problem in operations research.

The approach of the Chinese government is to transform a non-convex optimization problem into a convex optimization problem through slack variables (appropriate media and public opinion control) to ensure convergence, and the result of the local optimal solution is also the global optimal solution.

China is also very good at solving Pareto problems (multi-objective optimization)

The US government's approach is to try to solve non-convex optimization problems directly, and the result may not converge, or converge to multiple conflicting local optimal solutions.

This method can obtain the optimal solution by stacking computing resources when the computing resources are sufficient (the comprehensive national strength is strong), but once the computing power is insufficient, the ability to solve the problem will be greatly restricted.
 
Last edited:

Overbom

Brigadier
Registered Member
The Chinese government will not do this. Although the two girls may have serious behavioral problems, they are not illegal. In addition, it is a very cost-effective thing to use a low-cost event to force the public and the authorities to re-examine the super-national treatment of foreigners in China.
White worshipping is a mental illness
 
Top