Miscellaneous News

Nobo

Nobo

Junior Member
Registered Member
KYli said:
The issue is Israel has nuclear weapon.
Click to expand...
Actually that's a non issue. There is a reason why Israelis are afraid of other party having nukes despite they having them. You are up against people with whom deterrent doesn't work. Jews either will have to keep breathing by running or both side will die. The nukes are there for survival of the Jews on the run, not to guarantee survival of a imaginary nation. If it has to be nuclear, it will be. Be in no hesitation about that. The problem isn't nukes. It never was. It's the concentration to solve the problem permanently is continuously being distracted by parties who have reason to keep the imaginary nation alive. That may be finally coming to an end given the recent Saudi Iranian deal
 
M

MortyandRick

Senior Member
Registered Member
siegecrossbow said:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

The Democrat donkeys bray again…
Click to expand...
"The developments come at a particularly delicate moment for the administration, which has been trying to smooth tensions and maintain trade ties with Beijing as both economies teeter on the brink of recession."

Lol both economies on brink of recession? This is just cope.
 
R

RobertC

Junior Member
Registered Member
China's masterstroke in facilitating diplomatic relations between Saudi Arabia and Iran has suddenly isolated Israel in the region. China's next masterstroke was offering to facilitate similar relations between Israel and Palestine. The JCPOA was anathema to Israel so originally happy with Trump's exit but with Iran's response being enrichment to the edge of weapons grade Israel is now anxious to attack Iran. And was expecting the US to facilitate overflight permission with Saudi Arabia (examine an Israel-to-Iran and return map). That's no longer a possibility and Israel is getting frantic, especially with the increased religious nationalism starting to sour relations with the US. So now the US is facing three conflicts: NATO-Russia; US-China; and Israel-Iran. China is continuing to follow the path of diplomatic peace with economic benefits among nations and most of the world's populations are watching. And hoping China will turn its attention to them.
 
M

Minm

Junior Member
Registered Member
KYli said:
The issue is Israel has nuclear weapon. If Israel can continue its policies of eradicating Palestinians and building more settlements in the West Bank. A few decades from now, there would be only a few Palestinian enclaves left within Israel territory. After that, any country in the Middle East dares invading Israel would meet with nuclear weapon.

Time is ticking. Either Arabs stop Israel from taking most of West Bank now or it is too late. I just think it is already too late as Israel's plan of more settlements is already in fast motion.
Click to expand...
Even if the slow ethnic cleansing of the West Bank continues, what's the problem for China? Most people don't care who owns a piece of desert that has religious significance to some. Maybe once Israeli hunger for land has been satisfied they will make peace with the Arabs.

But the Palestinian problem will certainly continue. There are millions of refugees and an annexation of the west bank will add more. These people won't get citizenship in Jordan or Syria and Lebanon. So as long as there's no solution for what to do with all these people, there can't be peace between Muslim countries and Israel
 
A

ansy1968

Brigadier
Registered Member
RobertC said:
China's masterstroke in facilitating diplomatic relations between Saudi Arabia and Iran has suddenly isolated Israel in the region. China's next masterstroke was offering to facilitate similar relations between Israel and Palestine. The JCPOA was anathema to Israel so originally happy with Trump's exit but with Iran's response being enrichment to the edge of weapons grade Israel is now anxious to attack Iran. And was expecting the US to facilitate overflight permission with Saudi Arabia (examine an Israel-to-Iran and return map). That's no longer a possibility and Israel is getting frantic, especially with the increased religious nationalism starting to sour relations with the US. So now the US is facing three conflicts: NATO-Russia; US-China; and Israel-Iran. China is continuing to follow the path of diplomatic peace with economic benefits among nations and most of the world's populations are watching. And hoping China will turn its attention to them.
Click to expand...
Excellent analysis bro, we both think alike, there are 2 strategies in dealing with American Hegemony, an Arm Race and to deconstruct the US allies system.
 
Bellum_Romanum

Bellum_Romanum

Brigadier
Registered Member
daifo said:
US Southern Command general went to Argentina to hopefully lecture the VP about the CHYNA, he refused the meeting and she only met with others in the defense department. Still trying to persuade the Argentini to not buy sanction-free JF-17 but buy gimped F-16 that the US can turn off.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Click to expand...
I think you got this story wrong based on my reading of the article you linked. It said that Argentina's VP requested to meet up with Gen. Richardson but it was the U.S. SOUTHCOM general that refused to meet up with the VP Cristina Fernández de Kirchner. Then the VP's media spokesperson denied the report and called the media reporter(s) as liars for publishing a fake story.

The rest of what you said is true however regarding the strategic intentions of the American empire to ensure that China does not further encroached into what the U.S. has long considered it's own backyard (Monroe Doctrine). I don't know if the newspaper you linked is a left-leaning or right-leaning in terms of political ideological bend but the comments I read were very much against their VP for an embarrassment for their country and some comments were even very negative towards China, with one comment saying that Chinese supermarkets owners in Argentina "supposedly force" their workers to work 16 hrs per day as if they are operating in China for only 2000 pesos a day. It's much better to be aligned with Estados Unidos (U.S.A.) The comments itself could have been written by American psyops to project an image that Argentinians are very much against or at least have the appearance that it's negative towards China and their practices.
 
daifo

daifo

Major
Registered Member
Bellum_Romanum said:
I think you got this story wrong based on my reading of the article you linked. It said that Argentina's VP requested to meet up with Gen. Richardson but it was the U.S. SOUTHCOM general that refused to meet up with the VP Cristina Fernández de Kirchner. Then the VP's media spokesperson denied the report and called the media reporter(s) as liars for publishing a fake story.

The rest of what you said is true however regarding the strategic intentions of the American empire to ensure that China does not further encroached into what the U.S. has long considered it's own backyard (Monroe Doctrine). I don't know if the newspaper you linked is a left-leaning or right-leaning in terms of political ideological bend but the comments I read were very much against their VP for an embarrassment for their country and some comments were even very negative towards China, with one comment saying that Chinese supermarkets owners in Argentina "supposedly force" their workers to work 16 hrs per day as if they are operating in China for only 2000 pesos a day. It's much better to be aligned with Estados Unidos (U.S.A.) The comments itself could have been written by American psyops to project an image that Argentinians are very much against or at least have the appearance that it's negative towards China and their practices.
Click to expand...

yeah, i read it wrong :(
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top