Miscellaneous News

Chevalier

Captain
Registered Member
Oh, believe me, back when the West was doing these things, they considered it the "right side" of history, too.

"I do not admit ... for instance, that a great wrong has been done to the Red Indians of America or the black people of Australia. I do not admit that a wrong has been done to these people by the fact that a stronger race, a higher-grade race, a more worldly wise race to put it that way, has come in and taken their place." - Winston Churchill, 1937

Turns out the "right side" of history is basically whatever is in the West's current interests.
After the Opium Wars, the British tried to portray themselves as the good guys pushing for free trade....strange how they didn't extend that sentiment to drug traffickers into their own country.
It got to the point where propaganda like James Clavell's Taipan tried to portray the europeans and british as free trade advocates but look to the modern day where the Anglos are now trying to kill global free trade because China is winning the game the Anglos had rigged:


history will look back and judge the US decision to sanction and steal Russia's currency reserves as the biggest catalyst of the demise of the US dollar denominated empire. Previously they'd been able to get away with stealing smaller weaker nations' reserves like Venezuela but going after a UNSC permanent member meant that no-one was safe.

Anglos should have known, it's the same impetus behind the creation of their Magna Carta.
 

getready

Senior Member
Are British politicians all these attention seeking and freaky?
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Same with media, journalists and politicians here. At first I thought its just to hype up Chinese spying and interference propaganda. But I think the main aim is to distract and minimize the US and her Anglo vassals network of spying so that people get accustomed to US spying. Which is effective though as much as I hate to admit. People here are even fearful of installing WeChat and tiktok. But no such concern when using google Facebook etc

Which is weird when you think of wat US government did to Snowden and Assange but on other hand Chinese government has no jurisdiction over citizens in western countries.
 

KYli

Brigadier
It isn't if China can bear the cost of the war that matters. What matters is if Taiwan can and is willing to bear the cost of the war. Idiots in both Taiwan and the West just refuse to knowledge the fact that China would invade Taiwan if its sovereignty is at risk no matter the cost. But brainwashed Westerners still think China could collapse overnight and that they can choke off China's food and energy through sea blockade. And Taiwanese is still delusional enough to think the world would come to their rescue because Taiwan can help.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Chevalier

Captain
Registered Member
Same with media, journalists and politicians here. At first I thought its just to hype up Chinese spying and interference propaganda. But I think the main aim is to distract and minimize the US and her Anglo vassals network of spying so that people get accustomed to US spying. Which is effective though as much as I hate to admit. People here are even fearful of installing WeChat and tiktok. But no such concern when using google Facebook etc

Which is weird when you think of wat US government did to Snowden and Assange but on other hand Chinese government has no jurisdiction over citizens in western countries.
That's generally been the case for the Five Eyes and the United sTates in particular: accusing others of what they themselves are doing. Even as far back as the 90s, the UK was the most surveilled state on earth, and later Snowden would remark that the GCHQ was obsessed with spying on everyone.


Hope the Anglo americans are happy falling back on their day jobs to make ends meet. USG gonna need to find other ways to become profitable as per their capitalism religion in spite of growing civil unrest. Or they could also go socialist. Just a suggestion.
 

Laviduce

Junior Member
Registered Member
Not sure if posted already:

Is war between China and US inevitable? | Thinkers Forum


It was taken seriously in the USA that war between China and America is inevitable. The US is blaming China for its own decline. Today, Alan Freeman, a former principal economist with the Greater London Authority and the co-director of the Geopolitical Economy Research Group joined us in discussing why the USA’s decline is not China’s fault.


Insightful Summary by commentator Zeissiez:

"Here’s the big picture: Former US top strategist Zbignew Brzezinski said: “It is IMPERATIVE that no Eurasian challenger emerges capable of dominating Eurasia and thus also challenging America”. Because the US has just 4% of world’s population, and it’s isolated from Eurasia which has 70% of world’s population, or 87% with Africa included. Defensively, it’s a benefit to the US, but economically, it’s a handicap. That’s why, Eurasia is a rival to the US and the Euro is a rival to the dollar. How the US with an isolated 4% of world’s population stays a world hegemon? The dollar must stay as the world’s reserve currency.

This allows the size of the US economy to be highly scaled up, instead of being limited by the fundamentals. To be the world’s reserve currency, the dollar must circulate in the world. The US created a huge consumption economy and moved manufacturing outside, so that dollars flow out of the US to manufacturers like China or Japan. To make products, China and Japan need energy. So dollar is then circulated to Saudi mandated by the Petrol-dollar scheme. With the US stock and financial market much more lucrative than others, the dollars from Saudi are attracted back to the US. Money printed in the US to exchange for goods from outside ends up in Wall Street, where the rich gets richer. And that completes the cycle of circulation of the dollar. If China or Japan brings back all the dollars and exchange to their local currencies, it inflates the local currencies, making their exports expensive. So, China and Japan use some of the dollars to buy US debts (Treasury Securities). That’s why the US, a rich country, is in-debt to China which has just 1/5th of the US’ GDP/cap. By holding US debts, China and Japan have to support the dollar.

Since the US’ debt is in its own currency, it can simply print more dollar to pay interests. Other countries have to earn dollars to pay their debts, failing which results in defaults. In 2011 Obama announced “Pivot to Asia” to stop China’s rise. In 2013 China responded with the Belt and Road Initiatives (BRI) and diverted some US debts into BRI projects, to avoid keeping all eggs in one basket. The BRI creates new economies, therefore new trade markets for China. If Asia and Africa develop, the share of the US’ economy shrinks, then Euro could replace dollar as the world’s reserve currency. Then the US would no longer be able to print money freely without a hyperinflation like in Venezuela. And the size of the US economy has to fall back to the fundamentals, which is a lot smaller than the inflated economy. That’s why no country in Eurasia is allowed to catch up with the US’ economy. When Japan was catching up fast on the US in late 80s, it’s knocked down to a 3-decade stagnancy by rising Yen (Plaza Accord). And in the last 30 years, the US created wars and color revolutions in the Middle East, Central Asia and Africa to destabilize Afro-Eurasia, and the World Bank & IMF keep them poor. As the US prints lots of money, other countries’ dollar reserves shrink.

Furthermore, to prevent exports to the US becoming expensive, these countries have to print money too, which devalues the savings of the people and causes inflation. It’s estimated that our savings devalue by 6~9% per year after the abolishment of the gold-backed Bretton Woods system, after which the US prints money based on just the credibility of the dollar. Free money allows the US to have a big military, and the big military, in return, protects the dollar. For the record, the US had no mercy on threats to the dollar: * In 2000 Saddam Hussein said he would sell oil in Euros not Dollars.

>> Saddam was hanged by the US. * In 2009 Gaddafi wanted to make Libya export oil in pan-African Gold Dinars, not in dollar or Euro.
>> Gaddafi was killed by US & Sarkozy-backed NTC.

* Iran has been trading oil in currencies other than US dollars since 2011.

>> Iran was sanctioned by the US.

* After being sanctioned in 2014, Putin started to trade in non-dollar. By 2019, Putin (1) completely ditched dollars in oil trades, (2) sold almost all US debts, (3) is now the forerunner in de-dollarization.

>> The US tried to topple Putin by supporting Alexei Navalny, sanctioned Russia, and now the Ukraine war to weaken Russia.

* China (1) created the BRI, (2) uses non-dollar in oil trades with Iran & Russia, (3) introduced the CIPS, an alternative to the SWIFT system which is weaponized by the US to sanction others, (4) China’s economy and high-tech are catching up fast.

>> The US started a hybrid war against China: Trade war in 2018. Hong Kong color revolution in 2019. Tech blockage (Huawei ban, EUV banned from ASML). Got Australia into a trade war with China in 2020. Launched “Uyghur Genocide” & “Forced Labor” propagandas against Xinjiang (XJ), which is the hub of the BRI, to cut off the BRI. Sanctioned goods from XJ to create joblessness and uprising against the gov. After XJ was stabilized by China, the US orchestrated a coup in Kazakhstan in Jan ‘22, located right next to XJ, to cut off the BRI. In Aug ‘22, Pelosi visited Taiwan to provoke a civil war. If a country supports the dollar, it is looted by the US; if a country doesn’t support the dollar, the gov is changed by the US. This is financial slavery. The US can’t have direct wars with Russia and China as they are nuclear armed. Proxy wars put the battlefields outside of the US, and also allow the US to disguise as an outsider. In the 1980s, the US supported the Afghan Mujaheddin in a similar proxy war against the USSR and weakened it. Russia and China have clear redlines (*Russia: Ukraine a neutral buffer + Ethnic Russian’s safety in Donbas. *China: “One China principle”). The US used its proxies in Kiev and Taipei to push across the redlines to provoke the wars. After the Maidan coup by the US in 2014, Ukrainian army began shelling ethnic Russians in Donbas. It subsided after Minsk agreements in 2014/15, but as disclosed by Poroshenko in June ‘22, and by Merkel & Hollande in Dec ‘22, the Minsk were intended to buy time to arm Ukraine against Russia, not to seek peace. The US occupied Afghanistan for 20 years, but it finally left in Aug ‘21, evidently to prepare for the Ukraine project 6 months later. In Sep ‘21 Zelensky visited Biden to get support to join NATO, and shelling in Donbas by Ukrainian forces up 2800% on 16 Feb ‘22 (OSCE data), crossing Putin’s redlines and provoked the war. Pelosi visited Taiwan in Aug ‘22, after which China surrounded Taiwan with battleships. Historically, the US’ strategy against China-Russia has always been “one at a time” to avoid pushing them together. The move to put Russia forward amidst the on-going hybrid war against China, was due to a major development: The Fed has issued 80% of all US dollars in market in just 24 months. There was $4 trillion in circulation at the beginning of 2020. The number reached $20 trillion by Oct ‘21, amounting to a 31 trillions debt. Coupled with a global movement to diversify into non-dollar reserves fuelled by US sanctions & dollar’s creditability, the US economy and the dollar are in a crisis. The US proxy war in Ukraine: 1.Strengthened the dollar by weakening Euro. Only twice in history dollar is above Euro, both after a war in Europe: NATO's bombing of Serbia in 1999 (2 months after Euro became the currency of EU) and the Ukraine war. A strong dollar and the Fed’s timely interest rise, created a giant magnet attracting capitals from all over the world into the US. 2.Divided Russia from Europe..."
 

Laviduce

Junior Member
Registered Member
Continuation of previous post:

"...As the first NATO chief, Hastings Ismay described NATO’s role: “To keep America IN, to keep Russia OUT, to keep Germany DOWN”. NATO also allows the US to station missiles in Europe, keeping the US safe across the Atlantic. 3.Halted Nord Stream 2, and German firm Energie Baden-Wuerttemberg signed up gas from America Venture Global LNG for 20 years. >the US wrestled from Russia the control of energy to Europe. As George Friedman of US think tank Chicago Council OGA said in 2015:”The US’ primary fear is the combination of German technologies and Russian resources”. And Condoleezza Rice said in 2014: ”You (Europe) want to depend more on the North American energy platform, the enormous bounty of oil and gas we’re finding in America, not on pipelines through Ukraine or Russia.” 4.Pushes industries back to the US soil by de-industrializing Europe, as indicated by: (i) The US’ sabotage of N.S. pipelines and US gas sold 4x the price, (ii) The US’ proposed sanction on Algeria after Macron visited Algeria for a gas deal in Aug ‘22, (iii) The foiled sabotage on TurkStream pipeline which feeds Russian gas to Europe via Turkey in Oct ‘22, (iv) The US’ Inflation Reduction Act in Aug ‘22 which pulls capitals from Europe. Note: The US already bagged TSMC of Taiwan. 5.Created continuity for the Military Industrial Complex after Afghanistan. Despite the self-damage, the EU still gives unconditional support to Ukraine. In fact, two European countries (Ukraine and Germany’s N.S.) were attacked in 2022, NATO helped Non-Ally Ukraine, but Ally Germany was ignored.

There are 4 other wars going on, e.g. the Yemen war which killed half mil ppl and starving 16 mil. No one cares, because Saudi is an ally, and the war was lobbied by Raytheon. It’s NEVER about justice. Boris Johnson visited Kiev 3 times, to stop Zelensky from peace talk w Russia. Leaders in Europe, the Transatlantics (US-aligned elites), are pinning hopes on Ukraine defeating Russia to say job done to Washington. Zelensky is advertised a hero to get public support. The US is pushing Europe and Asia into wars. Remember after WW2, Europe and Asia were devastated, but the US emerged from the Great Depression, became the world leader and the dollar became the world’s reserve currency."
 

emblem21

Major
Registered Member
Oh, believe me, back when the West was doing these things, they considered it the "right side" of history, too.

"I do not admit ... for instance, that a great wrong has been done to the Red Indians of America or the black people of Australia. I do not admit that a wrong has been done to these people by the fact that a stronger race, a higher-grade race, a more worldly wise race to put it that way, has come in and taken their place." - Winston Churchill, 1937

Turns out the "right side" of history is basically whatever is in the West's current interests.
Australia and NZ will be under Asian dominance and Canada, the UK and the USA end up destroyed all because actions have consequences and he is about to learn just how low a breed the Anglos really are and that a superior race will eventually take back everything and ensure that these so call Brit’s get to go out with a whimper. Winston Churchill is going to cry like a little bit!h when China brings ruin to the west, especially the UK and US and then demonstrate throughly what being on the wrong side of history really feels like. Really, they could’ve show some humility and some awareness that colonism isn’t right but no, he thinks that he is superior to all others, well in the next few years, let’s see what the UK and USA looks like
 
Top