Miscellaneous News

baykalov

Senior Member
Registered Member
It seems that the European Commission realized that what they want to do with the frozen Russian assets looks like the most blatant theft, and the world will definitely notice this and draw the right conclusions.

The West has already greatly tarnished the reputation of its financial institutions and the world's trust in them has, to put it mildly, fallen. And outright theft will completely destroy that reputation. They are hindered by the remnants of laws and international law that have survived to this day, which do not allow outright robbery at the state level.

Therefore, the European Commission is considering a compromise option - to try to earn money from the frozen Russian reserves.

The European Commission is preparing to become a pawnbroker, trying to preserve the remnants of decency. "The Commission has proposed to invest the frozen reserves of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation in European government bonds and to expect a yield of 2.6 percent on them," Die Welt writes, citing an unpublished commission document the paper has. At the same time, the Commission admits that the frozen Russian reserves cannot simply be taken and sent, for example, to support Ukraine - "when the conflict is over, they must be returned to Russia" (!), Die Welt writes.

Direct grab fails, come on usury - invest, take interest and make Russian money work for Ukraine. But even here there is a big problem - the European economy is in such a state that it is simply dangerous to invest this money anywhere. Not only could you end up with no profit, but you could lose your investment. According to the preliminary estimates of the same European Commission, the losses from such an investment in a negative scenario could reach up to EUR 4 billion (taking into account the current state of the European economy after the anti-Russian sanctions).

But anyway, the re-classification of the European Commission as a usurious office would finally compromise Brussels. As for the reputation of the European Commission, they do not care. It has long been like a cheap brothel.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

birdlikefood

Junior Member
Registered Member
It seems that the European Commission realized that what they want to do with the frozen Russian assets looks like the most blatant theft, and the world will definitely notice this and draw the right conclusions.

The West has already greatly tarnished the reputation of its financial institutions and the world's trust in them has, to put it mildly, fallen. And outright theft will completely destroy that reputation. They are hindered by the remnants of laws and international law that have survived to this day, which do not allow outright robbery at the state level.

Therefore, the European Commission is considering a compromise option - to try to earn money from the frozen Russian reserves.

The European Commission is preparing to become a pawnbroker, trying to preserve the remnants of decency. "The Commission has proposed to invest the frozen reserves of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation in European government bonds and to expect a yield of 2.6 percent on them," Die Welt writes, citing an unpublished commission document the paper has. At the same time, the Commission admits that the frozen Russian reserves cannot simply be taken and sent, for example, to support Ukraine - "when the conflict is over, they must be returned to Russia" (!), Die Welt writes.

Direct grab fails, come on usury - invest, take interest and make Russian money work for Ukraine. But even here there is a big problem - the European economy is in such a state that it is simply dangerous to invest this money anywhere. Not only could you end up with no profit, but you could lose your investment. According to the preliminary estimates of the same European Commission, the losses from such an investment in a negative scenario could reach up to EUR 4 billion (taking into account the current state of the European economy after the anti-Russian sanctions).

But anyway, the re-classification of the European Commission as a usurious office would finally compromise Brussels. As for the reputation of the European Commission, they do not care. It has long been like a cheap brothel.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
It is a mistake to use a brothel metaphor.

Because if you pay and don't get the service, that's just robbery, maybe a brothel is more noble.
 

coolgod

Brigadier
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

A Plan to Ban TikTok in Montana Is a Preview for the Rest of the Country​

The fight has shown the difficult test and legally perilous road facing lawmakers or the White House if they try to enact a national ban on the social media service.
Lawmakers in Washington are
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
of TikTok on American soil. Montana might beat them to it.

The state’s Legislature is further along than any other body in the United States to passing a ban of the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, which has
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
for whether it is handing sensitive data about Americans to Beijing. A Montana bill to block the app was introduced in February, and the State Senate approved it last month. The State House, where the bill has a strong chance of passing after two more votes, is scheduled to consider it on Thursday.
New way for US to ban tiktok.
 

Overbom

Brigadier
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

China vows not to sell arms to any party in Ukraine war​

BEIJING (AP) — China won’t sell weapons to either side in the war in Ukraine, the country’s foreign minister said Friday, responding to Western concerns that Beijing could provide military assistance to Russia.
Qin Gang is the highest-level Chinese official to make such an explicit statement about arms sales to Russia. He added that China would also regulate the export of items with dual civilian and military use.
“Regarding the export of military items, China adopts a prudent and responsible attitude,” Qin said at a news conference alongside visiting German counterpart Annalena Baerbock. “China will not provide weapons to relevant parties of the conflict, and manage and control the exports of dual-use items in accordance with laws and regulations.”
 

Bellum_Romanum

Brigadier
Registered Member
I must say, for all the dumb crap their politicians spew, the American policy makers (the actual behind the scenes people who formulate their policies) are quite aware and pragmatic. Their analysis on China and the distinction that sets it apart from the rest of the developing world is very on point.
I wouldn't be surprised if they weighed all pros and cons over and over and came to the conclusion that China's growth is just very unique and one of those impossible to achieve odds that no other developing country could reach nor any of the developed countries could contain or halt. Thereby they came to the conclusion that only a kinetic war against China with all their vassals in tow could stop it for good.
The date they planned it was probably around 2020 when China was strong enough to be scary but not strong enough to defeat the US in the Pacific. COVID as a bioweapon was designed to weaken China further before they came to deal the final death blow by direct military action. This could very well sync in with the heightened tensions in 2020 when China put all of her theater commands on high alert believing an attack by the US was imminent, requiring Milley to call either Gen Qu or Gen Wei to say that the US wouldn't launch an attack without informing China beforehand.
I think there were 2 reasons why they couldn't go forward with their plans, first and the most obvious one was they didn't count on the virus spreading and becoming a global pandemic requiring not only the US but all of their vassals along with the rest of the world to focus on dealing with it, including financial grants to their populations and purchasing medical equipments from China. Secondly, the test of FOBS that took place around that time which as per their own assessments "managed to circumnavigate the globe before releasing a Hypersonic vehicle which missed its intended targets by only a couple of metres." These events might have deterred them and gave China crucial time to get even more powerful by building even more J-20s and AWACs, sensors, ballistic and hypersonic missiles etc. Either the genie is out of the bag and they have accepted that they might have missed their chance to take China down forever or they will go back to the drawing board and try again a few years later, remains to be seen.
Have you read the article published in the U.K. that posited a story suggesting that U.S. Defense dept had entered an agreement with Ukraine to conduct a study on Covid-19 a month before covid-19 became known to the world. Which begs the question, how would the Americans already know the name of the strain well ahead of time?

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

baykalov

Senior Member
Registered Member
Have you read the article published in the U.K. that posited a story suggesting that U.S. Defense dept had entered an agreement with Ukraine to conduct a study on Covid-19 a month before covid-19 became known to the world. Which begs the question, how would the Americans already know the name of the strain well ahead of time?

I read this thread on Twitter yesterday, what do you think?

 
Top