Miscellaneous News

Bellum_Romanum

Brigadier
Registered Member
I think you got it wrong.
Singapore needed US protection since our independence not because of threats from our kinsmen from China, but from those surrounding us.
Not realistic for tiny Singapore island, only 50 km wide, to survive a war with our hostile neighbors on its own.

Threats from Indonesia
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Konfrontasi (or Confrontation, 1963–1966) was a conflict started by Indonesia under the leadership of President Sukarno, who opposed the formation of the Federation of Malaysia consisting of Singapore, Malaya, Sarawak and North Borneo (Sabah).

Supporters of Indonesian preacher threatened an attack on Singapore:
Shanmugam | THE BIG STORY

Threats from Malaysia
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Ex-PM Mahathir says Malaysia should claim Singapore and Riau Islands
June 19, 2022

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
" Malaysia has threatened to cut off the water supply prematurely to pressure Singapore politically, a move that has sparked tensions between the two states.
"

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
(Instigated by Malaysia to cause instability in Singapore)
..
While I can understand and empathize with your concerns regarding Singapore's security and existence as a country, the fear that Indonesia, Malaysia or a combination of attack/invasions from those countries without other ASEAN countries, let alone China among others not coming to the rescue of your country is HIGHLY UNLIKELY especially if the said impending attack were to occur sometime in the future, not the immediate future. In that possible timeline, China is more than possibly the cemented power of the Asia-Pacific that able to assert itself into it's neighboring countries like Indonesia, and Malaysia not to even dare thinking that they can get away with impunity in trying to invade a sovereign country that's Singapore with a sizable Chinese ethnic group not to mention India will also probably react negatively since there's also a large contingency of Indians that are living in Singapore for centuries. I just don't see any path for Malaysia or Indonesia for that matter to allow their respective countries to succumb to such dumbassery and suicidal thoughts all for the glory of the Malay race and Islamic revival or some b.s. Unless the world is coming to an end, where international institutions have ceased to exist, and world powers are all entirely exhausted from their own exhaustive war of annihilation then sure that's a very distinct possibility, but the world is not there yet.
 
D

Deleted member 23272

Guest
Alibaba and Amazon are 商人 (traders) passing things and money from one hand to the other making no added values to the society. They are like lubricant of machine, necessary and even critical at some point but never the core and foundation, should never to be allowed to take the major chunk of resources and profit. Whenever they become too dominant, they should be cut into pieces, but we are not going to remove them.

BYD and CATL are making real things, they are the machines. They will be encouraged to be big, but on the condition that they don't suffocate the tech development, that is not being a patent bully to stop competitions.

In principle, there should be NO dominant power in industry, NOT even SOEs. The only dominant entity is the State, the country. Chinese businesses are only to be large to compete with foreign powers, but not to overshadow the state power. They are the tools of the state, not the owner and ruler of the state. If you study the Chinese history, you will realize that it is always like this. And this is the very reason that China remained an unified state for more than 2000 years.
You always have to strike the right balance. In the case of Alibaba, even without government intervention they were already kind of stagnating, continuously losing ground to other e-commerce companies like JD and PDD, the latter of which seems like its doing what Alibaba never managed to do in breaking into Western markets, declining from being the top dog in Chinese e-commerce to simply only having
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Taking the hulking machinery that they were and breaking off into six autonomous entities pursuing their own market and development goals, seems like a necessary step to allow for more flexibility and increasing competition.

But as always, even if business can't too big for its britches and threaten the state, so too can the state not be too heavy handed in controlling big business, less they wish to stifle competition, innovation, and drive up unemployment. You can't just kneejerk cut up a company just because it gets too big, since that destroys market confidence. And some big businesses like BYD, Baidu, Bytedance, Huawei, and DJI actually do have the right idea in investing in R&D to churn out groundbreaking technologies.

Of course, even if you're in charge of 1.4 billion people, you're still human in the end, so sometimes you get it right and sometimes you don't. Just got to pray in the end that wisdom and experience influence decision making so that they more often than not it get it right for the sake of fostering healthy development and innovation.
 

emblem21

Major
Registered Member
Okay, China is according to you facing an extinction scenario this year because of its leadership and when asked to provide a solution, you simply say more purges within the government. Not exactly helping your case here bud.
China is not a nation know for massive purges and executions in the modern time as of now, I mean you get that from the EU and the USA for all the silly crap they love to start there and as of now are right by fully hated for it, so China has no need to sink to those depths. Besides China is changing and if the USA cannot meet halfway, it’s there loss. Their focus on war and their neglect on everything else is going to lead to a purge like scenario whether anyone like it or not. This is the perfect time to show the world the best of China and highlighting the worst of the USA to the world with evidence. Anyone who advises that China gets its hands dirty as a first resort is an idiot. Besides nothing does destruction to US soft power then pretty much anything the USA does right now, starting from Biden taking about hairy legs, ice cream and little Children. And in regards to hard power, the destruction of the dollar and the cutting off of world resources to the USA will do the rest. I mean the nations that matter (not the EU) can easily have the heart and balls to see that the USA is lead by a retard and the nation is rapidly sinking into hell and it’s all because of their nature as racism and violence and their tendency to double, triple and quadruple down on any and everything, reinforcing failure many times more and the funny part is that most of their brains died with the last generation while this current one is too stupid to live ( I mean who’s bright idea was it to use the likes of Blinken and Kamala Harris as ministers, seriously they should have been fired after their first failures)
 
Last edited:

pmc

Colonel
Registered Member
1m is OPEC alone. much wider consensus. OPEC+ is additional. Iran is exempt. if Arabs accept Yuan as payment than it will become there interest that Yuan get stronger. and impose it on other countries. same with Gold. Turkey, EU, Japan, Korea countries with large energy deficits are going to feel it.
India is different as Indians earn money in Arabic currencies due to labor. even this Ukraine war cannot end unless Arabs are on board.

 

taxiya

Brigadier
Registered Member
You always have to strike the right balance. In the case of Alibaba, even without government intervention they were already kind of stagnating, continuously losing ground to other e-commerce companies like JD and PDD, the latter of which seems like its doing what Alibaba never managed to do in breaking into Western markets, declining from being the top dog in Chinese e-commerce to simply only having
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Taking the hulking machinery that they were and breaking off into six autonomous entities pursuing their own market and development goals, seems like a necessary step to allow for more flexibility and increasing competition.

But as always, even if business can't too big for its britches and threaten the state, so too can the state not be too heavy handed in controlling big business, less they wish to stifle competition, innovation, and drive up unemployment. You can't just kneejerk cut up a company just because it gets too big, since that destroys market confidence. And some big businesses like BYD, Baidu, Bytedance, Huawei, and DJI actually do have the right idea in investing in R&D to churn out groundbreaking technologies.

Of course, even if you're in charge of 1.4 billion people, you're still human in the end, so sometimes you get it right and sometimes you don't. Just got to pray in the end that wisdom and experience influence decision making so that they more often than not it get it right for the sake of fostering healthy development and innovation.
My post should not be interpreted as "anti business". It is statement of a principle in China. How to translate that principle to good practice is the work of wisdom. It is understood without being said.
 

supercat

Colonel
To be fair the CPTPP already had Japan in it. This just means that instead of a 5% chance of China making it in, it's closer to a 0% chance now. Free trade agreements with members of the US alliance system are basically impossible now which necessitates a faster shift to the developing world.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
I wonder how many G7 countries really want to decouple from China? As for CPTPP, it means little for China once you realize how many FTAs China has with the rest of the world, not even mentioning BRI, AIIB, APEC, BRICS+, and SOC.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


China and Singapore agree to upgrade ties, paving way for hi-tech cooperation

" Beijing and Singapore have agreed to upgrade their ties and extend cooperation to science and technology as well as supply chains, capping Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s week-long trip to China.

In a joint statement on Saturday, both sides agreed to upgrade bilateral relations to an all-round, high-quality, future-oriented partnership, a move which they said reflected their “desire to set the strategic direction and chart the development of bilateral relations going forward”.

The decision means China and Singapore can strengthen cooperation in areas including trade, investment, the digital economy, food security, finance and aviation, according to the joint statement.
China will upgrade its FTA with Singapore to the highest level, and Huawei just opened a R&D center over there.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Zambia's opposition leader welcomes Kamala Harris. The US had a major role in turning Libya, one of Africa's richest countries, into a basket case with open slave markets.

Today's fine example of Western values:
 

pmc

Colonel
Registered Member
Japan has bypassed the oil price caps for Russian oil

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Japan is becoming lose canon in sanctions.
These used vehicles have steering to the RHD. its the Left side that will be much more but not come directly but mix together with LHD of Middle east and Africa. Arabs will become so powerful that they can completely detach Africa and Asia from Europe. and than use that influence to get favorable permanent outcome.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

 

Sleepyjam

Junior Member
Registered Member
Alibaba and Amazon are 商人 (traders) passing things and money from one hand to the other making no added values to the society. They are like lubricant of machine, necessary and even critical at some point but never the core and foundation, should never to be allowed to take the major chunk of resources and profit. Whenever they become too dominant, they should be cut into pieces, but we are not going to remove them.

BYD and CATL are making real things, they are the machines. They will be encouraged to be big, but on the condition that they don't suffocate the tech development, that is not being a patent bully to stop competitions.

In principle, there should be NO dominant power in industry, NOT even SOEs. The only dominant entity is the State, the country. Chinese businesses are only to be large to compete with foreign powers, but not to overshadow the state power. They are the tools of the state, not the owner and ruler of the state. If you study the Chinese history, you will realize that it is always like this. And this is the very reason that China remained a unified state for more than 2000 years.
There seems to be some misunderstanding about the Alibaba restructuring. From what has been stated Alibaba is going to become a holding company similar to Google’s Alphabet move. Alibaba will still retains wholly ownership of the Taobao Tmall subsidiary and likely retain some form of ownership of the other subsidiaries. This isn't some forced government breakup but a businesses decision to be more competitive innovative and efficient.
 
Top