Miscellaneous News

ZeEa5KPul

Colonel
Registered Member
Xi stating to Putin that Russian people will elected him in 2024 was him saying that China will not overthrow him and he has Beijing's blessing to introduce whatever measures he considers necessary to stay in power. Why would he say something like that? There's only one explanation that has historical precedent.

We just witnessed a de facto act of homage of Putin's Russia to China. It was done with all necessary pretense and courtesy for practical reasons but that's what it was.

As of today Russia is a vassal state of China.

Put it in your diaries. It's a historical date.

21st of March 2022 Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin who styled himself the heir of Peter the Great who was the founder of Russian Empire gave homage as a vassal of a foreign power.

Xi so much win.jpg


For those who choose to reject reality - can you tell me at which moment the UK became a vassal to the US? Because if you can't then don't dispute what I just told you. It happened. Deal with it. I'm dealing with my head still spinning. But I don't question historical precedent.
You might want to elaborate on your logic here because I don't see it and I doubt I'm alone. The message could be interpreted in any number of ways, but by far the most natural is that China supports Putin's leadership of Russia and will stand beside him if the West tries any regime change shenanigans.

Your writing is often very insightful, but in this case I think your antipathy toward Russia is leading you toward strained interpretations and seeing things that aren't there.
Last summer he already told Russia that Ukraine is Putin's problem during the CSTO summit and there is no reason for him to change this stance now that Russia showed even more weakness.
Do you mean SCO? China is not a member of CSTO (a collection of former Soviet states) and to my knowledge does not attend their summits. The most harsh interpretation of Xi's message during the SCO was that China would look very differently on any hypothetical Russian invasion of Central Asian states. Since such is not in the cards - despite what some crazed Russian hypernationalists spout (probably Western agents provocateurs) - the natural reading was that it was a bland statement to reassure skittish Central Asian states.

Once again, I think your animus is leading you astray. China has no need or desire to "vassalize" Russia, Russia plays its part in the Grand Strategy(tm) without any prompting. It's a natural; all China needs to do is continue expanding trade and investment and make sure Russia has the resources it needs to wage its war.
Considering that there was no additional mobilisation and that the creeping offensive has not yielded results it will depend on how successful the upcoming Ukrainian push will be.
China has taken an overwhelming Ukrainian victory off the table in the same way (although through very different means) NATO has taken an overwhelming Russian victory off the table. Whatever happens next in the war is of secondary concern to China, its primary concern is that Putin's political standing in Russia isn't severely damaged and it's already excluded that outcome.
 

Sardaukar20

Captain
Registered Member
To be honest China would not plan to fight SK on the sea. They would hit them on land with the sea front being an afterthought.

Bohai direction is not somewhere SK navy can survive, since there's land based fire all around, but/when they escape the first island chain and become hosted by Japan(lol) or US further away, their ships are nearly as capable as PLAN equivlanents on a 1 to 1 basis.

China mainly needs to think about how to crack the SK ground forces and take ground.
It's not that China wants to fight SK at sea or not. I just think that the US will command SK to use it's navy to block PLAN ships from exiting the Bohai Sea to link up with the other PLAN forces in the ECS and SCS. The ROKN have subs, Aegis destroyers, and a minelayer for such a task. On top of that, the US might also command the ROKN to bombard the Chinese coast. The ROKN with land attack missiles could strike major Chinese cities like Qingdao, Liaoning, or Tianjin. Is it an extremely dangerous operation for the ROKN? Yes. But the US sees them as an expendable chess piece to use against China. Should we expect SK to grow a spine an disobey it's US master? I don't think we can trust SK to do that.

I expect the US plans to use the Japanese and South Korean navies as cannon fodder to bleed the Chinese first. The US Navy should be planning to fight from behind until the South Koreans and the Japanese have exhausted their forces. That's how the US historically fights mighty opponents. From behind willing allies.

From listening to US defense talks. I suspect that the US plans to use the Japanese navy as its expendable ASW and air defence fleet. While the South Korean navy is the expendable, all-round attack fleet. An in-depth look at their respective navies does indicate such a direction.

Better for China to budget resources and have a warplan to deal with SK as an enemy. At land, air, and sea. SK is already rapidly becoming a hostile state, so it should be treated as one.
 
Last edited:

horse

Colonel
Registered Member
The move of Russia to use mostly yuan in foreign trading is something that I never expected. And it really sounds like a junior partner. However, Xi must've promised some weapons, or weapons if the things turn sour for them in the Ukraine war.

It is kind of logical.

Look at the problem from Russia's prescriptive.

They need banking services and a medium (aka currency) to trade with the rest of the world.

The West robbed their money and kicked Russia out of the Western banking system. The sole goal there was to cut off Russian trade with the rest of the world.

Therefore, Russia needs to use something else other than USD, because that goes through the Western banking system.

What to use?

Well ... guess who is the biggest trading nation in the world? They use USD but they do not have to.

Russia just needs to coattail on the current trading relationships that does not involve the West, and that is everything coming and going from China.

Use Yuan, use non-Western banks. Russia will trade with the world with no problems.

Russia can use Roubles to trade, but the problem there is there could not be enough Roubles floating around in the world. In other words, transactions costs could go up, if using a currency not that widely used in international trade.

Right now, it is just more convenient for Russia to use Yuan in international trade. Russia is the biggest country in Europe, in terms of population. Russia probably has the second biggest economy in Europe. Russia is no small timer.
 

horse

Colonel
Registered Member
These predictions of yours lean more towards conspiracies.

China does not need vassals, nor does it wish to have vassals. China's vision of a new world order is not to copy the vicious and disgusting "hegemon-vassal" model of the US. China’s vision of a world order is one in which countries stand on their own and make their way in an international system as individuals and mutually beneficial cooperation. China believes that sovereignty should be the foundation of the new international system.

Yup, agree.

China has said that repeatedly, that everyone forgot, but you know, they one knows what they mean.

:cool:

Let's put it in another way. More stark and simpler.

There will be a new type of world soon in the future.

And there are only possibilities.

One narrative wants a new cold war.

The alternative narrative stresses a stable international environment based on a multipolar world.

That is the choice every country will decide.

New cold war, or a multipolar world.

:D

That is why the United States is screaming hysterically.

Who in their right minds would want a new cold war? The last Cold War, was not pleasant for some places in the world.

While the United States is screaming hysterically about a new cold war, West Asia gets serious about a peace deal, and other places like RCEP keeping on truckin'.

This lack of attention by other towards these shouts of a new cold war, I predict will make the United States scream even more hysterically about a new cold.

While everyone else outside of the West slides into multipolar mode.

When ASEAN tells the United States that they do not want to take sides, what is that suppose to mean?

Cold war? Multipolar world?

The changes are happening so fast, the Americans are in shock. They don't know what to say. Just scream hysterically.

:p
 

FriedButter

Brigadier
Registered Member
FYI. It’s the dailymail.

EXCLUSIVE: 'Trump will NOT be arraigned this week.' Former president is expected to be indicted tomorrow and Secret Service will make plans for his surrender and appearance in New York court NEXT WEEK
  • A source familiar with the proceedings exclusively told DailyMail.com on Tuesday: 'There will be no arraignment this week'
  • Trump is expected to be indicted Wednesday, after which the DA office will reach out to his Secret Service detail to make arrangements for his surrender

    Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Anyway, there were reports from other sites that all 36,000 NYPD is expected to be on stand by.
 
Last edited:

FriedButter

Brigadier
Registered Member
Huh? I thought he's done with NYC and moved to Florida permanently m

It would be better if Trump allows himself to get arrested. There is like 5-6 other cases and being indicted over this lesser charge would be politically better. Given the concerns over the statue of limitation, feds refusing to prosecute the misdemeanor, then NYC hiking it from a misdemeanor to a felony.

This would make the other cases and future indictments look more political in nature. Especially, the Georgia election interference one because the jury foreperson went on TV to cheer and laugh that they hinting towards an indictment. More political ammo for the 2024 campaign.

Also DeSantis may have sank his presidential campaign over this issue. He just turned the whole Trump/MAGA crowd against him.

In a pair of appearances on CNN and NBC News, Kohrs appeared to strongly hint that Trump was among those recommended for criminal charges while laughing, joking and making animated facial expressions that seemed to provide answers she knew she shouldn't be offering.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Hadoren

Junior Member
Registered Member
I have a nice idea for retaliating against Taiwan for a McCarthy visit.

Ban Taiwanese flights from transiting through mainland airspace for 1/3 of possible destinations. Enact this sanction for two years.

(Taiwanese flights to mainland China itself are still fine of course.)

This means Taiwanese can no longer fly direct to Europe for vacation. They have to do an inconvenient and time-consuming layover, adding hours to their journey. This especially affects Taiwanese who like to travel to Europe, who are likely to be the most separatist. (Of course they can still fly direct to non-sanctioned European destinations.)

If/when Tsai meets Biden, ban all Taiwanese flights from transiting through mainland airspace - except flights to the mainland itself. Taiwanese tourists should also be banned from Hong Kong and Macau for a year.
 
Top