Miscellaneous News

9dashline

Captain
Registered Member
Racism is very much prevalent in Europe, especially against Asians. And Europe does have the white supremacy mindset with their "garden" shit. Either way, I'm glad that their economies are tanking and they're losing influence, their gardener complained about the latter recently. French getting booted out of Africa is just the start.
The Apple no fall far from the tree...
US came from EU...

They are one and the same in the bones
 

luminary

Senior Member
Registered Member
This comment is so wrong.

White supremacism is NOT common in Europe. Racism in Europe is not defined around color anymore and it is much milder on average compared to the USA. The problem Europe has is Western dominance is not Western dominance. It is US dominance. The US influence spread unchecked in Europe after WW2 and it is currently so entrenched that countries in the continent don't have a movement space. Multiple generations of bureaucrats were raised in the current environment where Europe acts as an offshoot of pax Americana. Even on a cultural level neoliberal narrative around human rights and democracy is so common that you can't even oppose American narratives in most cases as a politician.

Most people here are aware that Europe isn't the center of the world anymore and are comfortable with this fact. Believe me about this. The problem most people fail to see is the excessive US influence
Sorry, I must've misconstrued that metaphor about the garden and jungle. Besides, the slip was from the EU foreign policy chief, so it's not like I can take it too seriously. I must simply accept Europeans have a special way of communicating I cannot understand as a foreigner.





In seriousness though, I can believe that skin color is less of an issue in Europe. But isn't the human rights + liberal democracy ideology its own form of supremacy? I'd argue that although power (or "the center of the world") has passed from the British Empire to the US, the reason the transition was so comparatively seamless was because the US was a direct European descendent. West Europe and North America share cultural DNA which is why Europeans happily live their imperial glory days vicariously through the US. The US, the "strongest nation in the history of the world", carries on the Western torch and is living proof of their exceptionalism. Europe will struggle hard against rise of China and the rest because we are fundamentally different civilization type. If the rest of the world succeeds in overthrowing their ultimate champion, the US, then it directly disproves this Western mythos.
 
Last edited:

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
View attachment 109290
Ants Gang losing faith in America, thinks US government betrayed Guo to get on CCP's good side.

I have noticed a lot of those crazies have this belief that "patriots" can rise up and purge US government of all the pro-CCP elements, free Guo and lead them all to glory. I reckon if you say you're a proud boy raising fund for an uprising against the deep state and return Trump to power you can con a lot of money out of them.

Get some slogans going, like: 杀牛羊,备酒浆,开了城门迎川王,川王来了不纳粮。

Are they actually in the US? What they said is pretty much treasonous content. Maybe I can report them to the government for a minor reward.
 

Lethe

Captain
While there are certainly contexts where it can be useful to do so, conflating all the various nations of Europe with each other and especially with the United States is going to obscure more than it illuminates.

I think those celebrating the difficulties that nations such as Germany are now experiencing are rather short-sighted. The European Union has long had the latent potential to serve as one of the major poles of a multipolar world, distinct from the United States. The political and economic fallout from the invasion of Ukraine has put an end to this. The Americans are back in charge of Europe now, and with the diminution of especially Germany, and the very different priorities of Eastern Europe as distinct from Western Europe, it is difficult to imagine that in the medium-term Europe could return even to even the "unrealised potential" of the recent past. Now, there is no potential. Henceforth Europe will consist of countries that are either (a) irrelevant or (b) American proxies. And in the aggregate those European countries will dance far more readily to America's tune on China going forward than they would've only a few years ago, reflecting those new configurations of power.

On the subject of the United States and the prospect of new configurations of power producing changes in culture, folks should check out Patrick L. Smith's short book (really, extended essay) Time No Longer: Americans After the American Century. It was published in 2013 in the wake of the failure of the War on Terror and reflects upon precisely these issues. Here are some of my favourite excerpts:

We live among the remains of a defeat of historical magnitude. We need to think, quite simply, of who we have been. Recall our nation’s declared destiny before and during its founding. The Spanish-American War and all that followed—in the name of what, these interventions and aggressions? What was it Americans reiterated through all the decades leading to 2001—and, somewhat desperately, beyond that year? It was to remake the world, as Condoleezza Rice so plainly put it. It was to make the world resemble us, such that it would have to change and we would not. This dream, this prospect of a global society whose imagining made us American, is what perished in 2001. To put the point another way, America lost its long war against time.

Look upon 2001 in this way, and we begin to understand what it was that took its toll on the American consciousness. Those present had witnessed the end of a long experiment—a hundred years old if one counts from the Spanish war, two hundred to go back to the revolutionary era. I know of no one who spoke in these terms at the time: It was unspeakable. But now, after a decade’s failed effort to ‘create reality’, we would do best not only to speak of it but to act with the impossibility of our inherited experiment in mind—confident that there is a truer way of being in the world.”

“An inability to change is symptomatic of a people who consider themselves chosen and who cannot surrender their chosenness. When we look at our nation now, do we see the virtuous republic our history has always placed before us as a sacred chalice? [….] Do Americans have a democratic mission? Finally someone has asked. And the only serious answer is, ‘They never did.’”
 

Serb

Junior Member
Registered Member
While there are certainly contexts where it can be useful to do so, conflating all the various nations of Europe with each other and especially with the United States is going to obscure more than it illuminates.

I think those celebrating the difficulties that nations such as Germany are now experiencing are rather short-sighted. The European Union has long had the latent potential to serve as one of the major poles of a multipolar world, distinct from the United States. The political and economic fallout from the invasion of Ukraine has put an end to this. The Americans are back in charge of Europe now, and with the diminution of especially Germany, and the very different priorities of Eastern Europe as distinct from Western Europe, it is difficult to imagine that in the medium-term Europe could return even to even the "unrealised potential" of the recent past. Now, there is no potential. Henceforth Europe will consist of countries that are either (a) irrelevant or (b) American proxies. And in the aggregate those European countries will dance far more readily to America's tune on China going forward than they would've only a few years ago, reflecting those new configurations of power.

On the subject of the United States and the prospect of new configurations of power producing changes in culture, folks should check out Patrick L. Smith's short book (really, extended essay) Time No Longer: Americans After the American Century. It was published in 2013 in the wake of the failure of the War on Terror and reflects upon precisely these issues. Here are some of my favourite excerpts:


I think that EU would only verbally bark at China. Or give symbolical sanctions on Chinese officials and individual companies like Huawei, or from Xinjiang, not to China as a whole.

They already have it enough from Russia, GDP freezing and 10% inflation, I don't think they want to x10 that with China.

Regarding Ukraine, they could still lie to themelves that its because of their own "safety", they are doing sanctions and surrendering weapons, since Russia is also bordering them, but in the Taiwan scenario, it isn't the case in my opinion.
 

BoraTas

Major
Registered Member
Sorry, I must've misconstrued that metaphor about the garden and jungle. Besides, the slip was from the EU foreign policy chief, so it's not like I can take it too seriously. I must simply accept Europeans have a special way of communicating I cannot understand as a foreigner.





In seriousness though, I can believe that skin color is less of an issue in Europe. But isn't the human rights + liberal democracy ideology its own form of supremacy? I'd argue that although power (or "the center of the world") has passed from the British Empire to the US, the reason the transition was so comparatively seamless was because the US was a direct European descendent. West Europe and North America share cultural DNA which is why Europeans happily live their imperial glory days vicariously through the US. The US, the "strongest nation in the history of the world", carries on the Western torch and is living proof of their exceptionalism. Europe will struggle hard against rise of China and the rest because we are fundamentally different civilization type. If the rest of the world succeeds in overthrowing their ultimate champion, the US, then it directly disproves this Western mythos.
Don't get me started on the EU bureaucracy. The current leaders are so utterly incompetent and corrupt that they turned many European Federalist types to anti-EU people. And ironically these people are not elected despite their daily preaches regarding democracy (which is a quasi-religion nowadays with its own mythos and sins). Borrell's garden comment was idiotic.

The power passed seamlessly from the British to the USA because of European rivalries. The British Empire got butthurt about then rising Germany and Russia. To cover its West it had to ally with the USA. Then the French and British spent themselves in their 50 year long rivalry with Germany. Two massive wars erupted in this time frame. By the end of the second of the said wars Europe was wartorn and Russians and Americans were already in every part of Europe. Otherwise the change would not be seamless. Just look at the late 19th century. The French were 100% okay with killing Germans. The political concept of "the West" didn't exist.

If there was no US propaganda most people would be OK with China. Uyghur genocide accusations etc are what made China this unpopular recently. The problem is the same again. Unchecked US influence
 

coolgod

Brigadier
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Brazilian President Lula to visit China
At the invitation of Chinese President Xi Jinping, Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva will pay a state visit to China from March 26 to 31, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Hua Chunying announced on Friday.

Lula visiting China for almost a week, I'm guessing he will sign lots of agreements, including BRI agreements.
 
Top