Miscellaneous News

Overlord

New Member
Registered Member
I

I think pakistan military (the people who holds real power in pakistan) still pretty tight with PLA, this unlikely to change no matter who is the PM
Who Knows ? Pakistan has given airbase to USA and even they are supplying arms to Ukraine. Maybe pakistan is using china to counter india. Pakistan military and their elites have deep ties to USA and UK.

If china had more influence on pakistan then they could have atleast told Pakistan to atleast not take side in russia vs Ukraine conflict.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Overlord

New Member
Registered Member
india does not have a navy capable of challenging China in scs or taiwan straits, plus as long as China and Pakistan remain tight, no way will india goes full retard against China, similar situation with SK being checked by NK, and if China play her card right she can use Russia to check japan
Think outside of war scenario .

India doesn't want war with china that's why they tried to disengage from Himalaya. Indo Pacific and quad has other goals that is to counter Chinese influence in these region too. India can now save cost in militry because 50,000 troops are now will be free from Himalaya and they can use money or influence to take indian Ocean Country to their sides which means by making more military ties with them ( USA won't cry about it like they are crying about Solomon Islands, india quickly did logistic agreement and increased defence ties with Vietnam too recently )

India won't take participate in war but probably it would supply alot of weapons like missile and other defence stuff to countries in South China sea and indian ocean and they might increase defence R&D with Japan .
 

FairAndUnbiased

Brigadier
Registered Member
Think outside of war scenario .

India doesn't want war with china that's why they tried to disengage from Himalaya. Indo Pacific and quad has other goals that is to counter Chinese influence in these region too. India can now save cost in militry because 50,000 troops are now will be free from Himalaya and they can use money or influence to take indian Ocean Country to their sides which means by making more military ties with them ( USA won't cry about it like they are crying about Solomon Islands, india quickly did logistic agreement and increased defence ties with Vietnam too recently )

India won't take participate in war but probably it would supply alot of weapons like missile and other defence stuff to countries in South China sea and indian ocean and they might increase defence R&D with Japan .
Indian R&D "help" would hold Japan back.
 

MixedReality

Junior Member
Registered Member
Sorry that's not fair to the Queen who had no political power in UK during her reign. Despise generations of British politicians and elites for the colonial atrocities before her reign (and perhaps during as well). No, I'm not a fan of her, nor I hate her. As far as I know she's a decent human being who did her job well. All the vile remarks and responses are just unclassy and unjustified.

The entire British ‘royal’ family are mass murdering ghouls. That evil witch headed that genocidal family that killed millions of people and stole trillions worth of wealth. The world is a better place today now that wicked witch is dead.
 

daifo

Major
Registered Member
Who Knows ? Pakistan has given airbase to USA and even they are supplying arms to Ukraine. Maybe pakistan is using china to counter india. Pakistan military and their elites have deep ties to USA and UK.

If china had more influence on pakistan then they could have atleast told Pakistan to atleast not take side in russia vs Ukraine conflict.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
China has a general no interference policy (which of course they can break) for it's non core interest. China knows the game well enough that Pakistan likely has to do some token gestures to stay on the good side of the richer western countries.
 

Bellum_Romanum

Brigadier
Registered Member
1.4 billion Jai Hinds are mourning her passing as we speak.

(as well as a few Hanjian Anglo-worshipping cockroaches on this forum).

She died too late, and too painlessly. Bitch should have been assassinated like Abe.
But realistically though what power did she ever exercise that contributed to the deaths, mayhem, and destruction her Governments did against many countries? The Queen or the royals don't have that power anymore even if they still do technically speaking according to their constitution. The King or Queen could essentially dismiss and or deny any PM if he or she wishes to do so but under the current environment such action would make the Royal standing in Britain tenuous and one that could even maybe lead to their dissolution.
 
Top