US using the tariff as a leverage against China is like a person promising to cut his own arm as a threat to another person. My grandma told me that back in the old days there were such people (无赖) trying to extort money.
US using the tariff as a leverage against China is like a person promising to cut his own arm as a threat to another person. My grandma told me that back in the old days there were such people (无赖) trying to extort money.
Man, Poland's economy is doing so good it looks like Neverland. What an awesome country Poland is eh. They're run by magical beings with magical thoughts thinking that the country will come out relatively unscathed from the scourge of inflationary hikes from the war in Ukraine. But yet we have a persistent person from that country who keeps blabbering about China's zero-covid19 policy making doom and gloom predictions when the very country that person is from is literally going through a world of economic pain. Talk about priorities.
The current inflation is the result mostly of the utter incompetent government which has been in power for now like 7 years. The sanctions and global supply chain issues from lockdowns and covid, I guess are half of the official inflation. The inflation in prior years was growing faster and faster, one of the reasons was the huge growth of minimum wage from 400 euro to 600 euro in few years, and free money for children 120 euro per child per month.
Sanctions don't need to be responded to with sanctions. They can be responded to with other legal tools like strict regulatory enforcement or making it illegal to comply with unilateral foreign imposed sanctions.I think you meant symmetrically strike back with legal tools. The solution to this is a financial one - China should build up CIPS into a complete payments and messaging system and conduct transactions with all its partners outside the dollar system. This at least obfuscates these transactions and makes sanctions enforcement impossible.
China’s deal with the Solomons is an act of colonisation
Sitting off the coast of eastern Australia, Chinese intelligence gathering facilities will monitor all military bases on the east coast, as well as the movements of aircraft and naval vessels.
This massively simplifies the Chinese capacity to interfere with even day to day training and complicates Australian efforts to achieve even a modicum of operational security about our more sensitive military capabilities.
We need to call this what it is – the Chinese Communist Party is undertaking a new age colonisation of the South Pacific. Without firm action from Australia, its Pacific neighbours as well as security partners, the Chinese will expand throughout the South Pacific. It will take a joined-up effort of thinking and resourcing from the region, and partners from further away such as the United States, Japan, Indonesia and yes, France, to combat this expansion.
Yeah and I don't think china has any response to this at all. That's why the US keeps doing it. No repercussions.
So ultimately no visit right?Tinfoil hat : it's a face saving method to cancel the visit without being called as weak.
The US wouldn't mind that.Nothing gives them satisfaction than seeing another Chinese tech company destroyed.As other posters said, this is an own goal.
China is a podiatrist, the USA patient is angry, cuts their own foot off and throws it at the podiatrist and says "I DON'T NEED YOUR SERVICES ANYMORE HA! HA! HA!"
How do you respond to that?
Dahua and Hikvision are something like 80% of the market. (This report has Hikvision at 38% by itself, I believe Dahua is quite close behind). You can't replace this void magically by just going to the third place supplier, they simply do not have the capacity.
So the only solution is to close down all the companies that Hikvision are supplying and just forget about video surveillance. You don't NEED it after all, it's not food or water.
This can be part of a deadhand system... fully autonomous AI subdrone powered by nuclear that can wait for years or decades if necessary in order to take final revenge etc...The first advantage I can think of is it can't be shot down by air defense and can't be detected by radars. Second is the nuclear fallout will be localized in the area where it exploded and where the radioactive water the tsunami carries it.
I read an article of US underwater nuclear blast testing in the past, and they found that radioactive water is really hard to neutralize and is at a higher concentration of radiation compared to radioactive air, so it will contaminate the soil and the water supply of the target country for a really long time.
What do you mean essentially equal to using nukes? It's just another way of delivering a nuclear warhead, except much bigger. It can be loaded with a 100 MT warhead. That's double the size of Tsara Bomba. Throughout the cold war there was no way to deploy warheads that size, now there is.Using it would be essentially equal to using nukes, so what's the point? Judging from the way it works, it is not going to be more effective than the old-fashioned ICBM.