Ukrainian War Developments

Status
Not open for further replies.

RottenPanzer

Junior Member
Registered Member
Ukraine’s general staff reports that Russia has lost 19,500 soldiers and 58,500 wounded. These numbers are so ridiculous. That would mean Russia lost 40% of the 200k invasion force. The Pentagon has put a more realistic number of 4K dead and 7k wounded. I think the Ukrainians are projected and that’s their true losses. If those losses were true then Ukraine is two weeks away from Moscow.
I need to know the source of this statement from Pentagon, this is pretty big deal!
LOL...

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Old German tanks could be sent to Ukraine
Rheinmetall could start the delivery of up to 50 Leopard 1 tanks in six weeks, the company’s chairman has revealed to journalists
Depends on the Leopard 1 type
Leopard 1A5 or 1A4 could be pretty troublesome since they had pretty decent fire control system with thermal imaging
 

Lethe

Captain
Obviously, if Russia were to mobilise for war it would take some months for this to be reflected on the battlefield. The short-term gain would be limited to retaining the current crop of trained conscripts. To spin this around, it suggests that one reason why Russia has not mobilised is because Moscow still seeks or sees as potentially desirable a fairly limited settlement, built upon battlefield dynamics to be played out over the next couple of months using forces that are currently available or can be generated on short notice.

On the other side of the negotiating table, the Chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Mark Milley, expects the war to go on for
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
:

When asked by Rep. Bill Keating (D-Mass.) how long he thought the war could last, Milley responded that it was “hard to tell.”

“It’s a bit early, still. Even though we’re a month-plus into the war, there is much of the ground war left in Ukraine,” he added. “But I do think this is a very protracted conflict, and I think it’s at least measured in years. I don’t know about a decade, but at least years for sure.

Meanwhile, apropos of nothing...

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

"That’s why the way I am talking to them is absolutely justified. I don’t have any more lives to give. I don’t have any more emotions. I’m no longer interested in their diplomacy that leads to the destruction of my country,” the president added.

Doesn't take much imagination to look at those two statements, see a western alliance eager to bleed Russia "to the last Ukrainian" and a Ukrainian leader wising up to that...
 

Lapin

Junior Member
Registered Member
You are venturing into pure racism. Imagine the reaction on this forum if you replaced "Russia" with "China," because that's the type of content that Chinese have to put up with in the past decades from MSM. Dehumanizing an entire ethnicity. Reported.
Note that the troll shows his abysmal 'reading comprehension" (at best) and his fanatical bigotry.

I QUOTED an article by a Lithuanian (who grew up in the USSR) that's extremely critical of Russia and Russians.
I did NOT write that I completely agreed with it. Indeed, anyone who's competent at reading English
(many writers here seem nearly illiterate in English) should have noticed MY CRITCISMS of parts of the article.
In particular, I reject her dichotomy between "Ukrainians are Western and good" and "Russians are non-Western and bad."
It's wrong to blame Russians alone for all Soviet war crimes; Ukrainians committed their share of war crimes too.

If I quoted Putin, then would the idiotic pro-Russian crowd here conclude that I must completely agree with Putin?

I speak Russian and have been in Russia. I know many Russians who are much more informed and more critical of
conditions in Russia than the breathless Chinese acolytes here who eagerly absorb every word of Russian state propaganda.
Many Chinese here seem eager to corroborate--unwittingly--some of the worst stereotypes of Sinophobic propaganda.
 

Richard Santos

Captain
Registered Member
URL]


Doesn't take much imagination to look at those two statements, see a western alliance eager to bleed Russia "to the last Ukrainian" and a Ukrainian leader wising up to that...


I read in Zelensky not a bad man, perhaps a brave man, but certainly not a big man, caught at the center of big events.

I read in him a conflict between, on the one hand, sadness at the destruction being wrought upon his country and indignation at the Russians for daring to invade it, but on the other hand, enjoyment of the adulation being showered upon him by foreign powers for playing the role they assigned him in their effort to use his country to bleed Russia dry.
 

Richard Santos

Captain
Registered Member
He certainly is a bad man. What else would you call someone who knowingly brought destruction and death to his country by following foreign orders?

Ukraine is on its way to become a Syria 2.0
He sees much more convergence in the interests of his country and these of the foreign countries in question than you do.
 

Lapin

Junior Member
Registered Member
"A Ukrainian mother of four said she wanted to die after being raped for more than 12 hours by Russian soldiers."

Many men here have proudly proclaimed that they embrace the 'moral' principle of 'might makes right'.
Many men here have professed their hatred of Ukrainians, particularly alleged 'Banderivtsi', who deserve to be wiped out.

So it's reasonable to infer that at least some men here, however much they may pretend otherwise in public,
really admire or envy the Russian soldiers who evidently repeatedly raped this Ukrainian woman.
Why would these 'might makes right' men have any moral objection to taking women by force?

"Ukraine’s ombudswoman for human rights said she had recorded horrific acts of sexual violence by Russian troops in Bucha
and elsewhere, including a case in which women and girls were kept in a basement for 25 days, the New York Times reported.
Nine of those victims are now pregnant, according to the ombudswoman, Lyudmyla Denisova."

I would submit that the unwanted pregnancies may be prima facie evidence of rape.

Given the zeal with which many men here strive to deny any evidence of Russian war crimes, however, I expect some
men would like to believe that these Ukrainian women and girls, pretending to show their gratitude to their 'liberators',
seduced helpless innocent Russian soldiers and enjoyed sexual intercourse with them many times every day for 25 days.
Then the impregnated Ukrainian women and girls suddenly 'cried rape' in appealing for Western aid.

I have heard similar rationalizations of Soviet soldiers' mass rapes when they 'liberated' eastern and central Europe.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top