Ukrainian War Developments

Status
Not open for further replies.

Helius

Senior Member
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

EU has exhausted all financial sanctions on Russia – bloc’s top diplomat​


Josep Borrell says Brussels has hit the wall in terms of what else can be done to harm the country’s economy

The EU has used up all of the possible restrictive measures against Russia in response to the ongoing war in Ukraine, the bloc’s High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Josep Borrell said, in an interview with Franceinfo on Thursday.

“Of course, one can always go further, but we have already reached the limits of what we can do. We have done everything we could,” he said.
Borrell clarified that he was referring to the massive sanctions that have led to a 40% crash of the Russian currency. “These are very heavy sanctions that will put a heavy burden on the Russian economy,” he explained.

According to the foreign-policy chief, the ban on the export of high technologies was the most painful punitive measure for the Russian economy.

On February 24, Russian President Vladimir Putin announced a military operation in Ukraine to defend the newly-recognized Donbass republics, which broke away from Kiev in 2014. In response, Western countries, including the EU, UK, US, Canada and others introduced or significantly expanded personal and sectoral sanctions, particularly targeting Russia’s sovereign debt and its banking sector. The measures also targeted members of the State Duma, many business figures, as well as, personally, President Vladimir Putin and Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov. Some Russian banks have been cut off from the SWIFT payment system, while international businesses started pulling out from Russia or halting sales to the country.
So they pretty much pulled a Trump and played all their cards.

The West: *look at each other* Okay now what?

Putin: *brushes shoulder off* That all you got?
 

OppositeDay

Senior Member
Registered Member
Over the next few days there will be increasing pressure on China to "mediate" and help solve this peacefully. Europeans will try to flatter China by asking them to show how they are now a world leader, Americans will do what they always do and threaten sanctions.

However it is all a trap. What they actually want is for China to put economic and diplomatic pressure on Russia, expending goodwill with Russia in return for them granting concessions. The Ukrainians know they are being backed by America and all of Europe, so they feel they can be unreasonable as they want in their demands. The Russians have no major power in their corner. It is the classical colonial game of divide and conquer. I don't think Russia will change it's stance regardless of what China says, but will see it as a betrayal for decades to come if China ends up in the western camp on this.

The only best approach to this is to treat it like it was a conflict in any other continent. Call on both sides to resolve the issue bilaterally, and maintain relations with both sides. That will be all the support Russia needs for the foreseeable future without antagonising the west needlessly.

Everything that is currently being done to Russia right now was planned to be used on China in the near future. The Anglos didn't expect Putin to actually invade the Ukraine so they had to deploy it on Russia instead.

The good news is Xi is showing strong resilience on this matter, and is being guided by a public largely sympathetic to the Russian cause and suspicious of western intentions. I hope he continues to do so.

My suggestion for China is to make "no legal changes to the sovereign territory of Ukraine" a pre-condition for Chinese mediated talks, because of China's respect for territorial integrality, UN Charter and all that. Russia will reject it publicly. This does not create tension between China and Russia. China already does not recognize Crimea for similar reason (no unilateral referendum for independence). It will be tough for EU/US to call on China to drop the pre-condition, because who can be against Ukrainian territorial integrality?
 

plawolf

Lieutenant General
does Russia not want to take Ukraine with minimal losses?

I mean which is better, low loss and win or high loss and win

surely no matter how many tanks you have and what doctrine you follow

it is simply idiotic to do what the Russians are doing


Yeah its dramatic footage, but it is also a sign of just how dire the situation is for the Ukrainians.

The Russians were bunching up on the main road and they could only bring, what? A single artillery piece to bare that whole time, and what did they actually achieve against such a target rich environment? One kill?

The Russians are sloppy and over confident, but they are still beating the snot out of the Ukrainians.
 

SanWenYu

Captain
Registered Member
A freudian slip of his highness of Duke of Cambridge:

1.png

A British author and journalist tried to give the prince a lesson on the history of European wars in the last 200 years. But why did he omit the Seige of Sevastopol in 1854, the Greek Civil War in 1946? And as a runner-up, the Battle of Waterloo in 1815? If we are talking about bloodshedding, how could we not to mention the Northern Ireland in the 1970s?

Did this journalist have a fredian slip, too, thinking that the European wars were all because of the baddies and barbarians? Just look at the names he named.

Or was he trying not to remind his audience the European wars where the Imperial army and navy had blood in their hands?

2.png
 

Weaasel

Senior Member
Registered Member
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top