Ukrainian War Developments

Status
Not open for further replies.

Richard Santos

Captain
Registered Member
Good catch on the date (Feb 28) and I missed that. The Russian was particular about avoiding civilian casualties at this time. More evidence suggesting it is not Russian.
japan incurring a serious grudge from a russia with 5000 nuclear weapons is not in a good position to confront china.
 

Richard Santos

Captain
Registered Member
This is actually a great way to unload those Chinese dollar reserves to buy something which has actual use and cannot be as easily confiscated on pennies on the dollar. China has also been unloading the European holdings it got after the 2008 crisis for 2-3 years already. Right on time. Since European stocks in general have been going down the drain.


Man France24 and Deutsche Welle are so autistic against Russia that they make Fox News look sane. They have been like this at least since 2014. It is dangerous that European media is in a reality bubble like this.


Russia will not give up on the Sea of Okhotsk since it is the bastion for their Pacific SSBN fleet. If the Japanese had the Kuril islands they would control entries and exits from the bastion into the Pacific. Maybe the Russians need to dust off Stalin's plans to invade Hokkaido. j/k
i doubt russia is keen to accept US dollars from china at the moment. the russians would probably demand gold or chinese yuan. The Russian bargaining position is not quite as poor as it might seem, China also wants to internationalize the yuan further as a way to hedge away its own exposure to the dollar, it will undoubtedly be willing to pay some premium to achieve that.

Russia might have rewarded japan if japan didn’t hastily jump on the American squeezing the russians bandwagon, but right now, the slim chance of any settlement of the japanese northern territories is pushed out by at least another generation.

As to invading hokkaido, when was the last time the russians conducted any serious cross open-water amphibious operation against a modern opponent? People speak of putin’s russia abs stalin’s soviet union as if they were the same thing and the rest of the world as compared to the USSR remains much as it were in 1945.
 
Last edited:

MortyandRick

Senior Member
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Easy to announce headlines but the devil's in the details. How are they gonna do it? Maybe buy more solar panels form Xinjiang or more wind turbines from China or more nuclear reactors ... With Chinese technology.
Words are cheap. Actions are hard.

ego cause the west didn't have the courage to momentarily look weak by flat out saying Ukraine wont be allow to join NATO
It was not ego is lack of courage. It was strategy and geopolitics. They did it specifically to draw Russia our into a conflict. It was quite deliberate I feel.
 

HereToSeePics

Just Hatched
Staff member
Moderator - World Affairs
Registered Member

According to these clowns, China must use SWIFT to trade with the rest of the world . American chokehold must be protected at all costs

"if we catch..." - thats why the US/NATO powers are shooting itself in the foot with the SWIFT bans. Once off swift and using bilateral financial networks, CIPS, eRmb/digital yuan, the United States will no longer be able to monitor and track who's sending or receiving money since those systems are not obliged to report client and transaction details to the United States.

One would think it would to your own interest to keep your so called adversaries and enemies on your system so you can continuously monitor and track their financial movements and who they are trading with.

SWIFT and the USD is a like a drug and it's in the best interest for the United States to be the dealer, cutting people off just forces them to go to other suppliers.
 
Last edited:

Richard Santos

Captain
Registered Member
“if we catch…” is self defeating bluster from a political culture that has embraced the mantra of “braggadocio is strength”.

The reason why the US can get away with it for a while is the US does actually have real strength to back it up. The problem is the US political culture is increasingly committed to braggadocio over investment in real strength, so the real strength, while still formidable, is a wasting asset.

Fragmenting the world finance by torpedoing the Dollar’s role as a reliable reserve currency is one of those weapons that is terrible but that can be used once. The US just used it and shot it’s wad, not for any real long term strategic gain worthy of firing off this one available shot, but as a apoplectic reflex over the fact that Russia did not just keel over when the US wanted her dead.
 
Last edited:

FriedButter

Brigadier
Registered Member
“if we catch…” is self defeating bluster from a political culture that has embraced the mantra of “braggadocio is strength”.

The reason why the US can get away with it for a while is the US does actually have real strength to back it up. The problem is the US political culture is increasingly committed to braggadocio over investment in real strength, so the real strength, while still formidable, is a wasting asset.

Fragmenting the world finance by torpedoing the Dollar’s role as a reliable reserve currency is one of those weapons that is terrible but that can be used only be used once. The US just shot it’s wad, mainly because it felt good to huff and puff and blow a house down.
Honestly, the most surprising aspect of this for me was the weaponization of the dollar. I didn’t expect the US to blow their wad against Russia who is much more weaker instead of China. Just more proof for Alex Mercouris claims that the West is being led by amateurs.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top