Yeah, if the claim of Ukr troops using Russian markings is true, that constitutes Perfidy and it is a war crime.
"The term ruse de guerre is given legal meaning within the . Good faith is required, but at least 17 different types of ruse,
including , false radio messages, the use of spies and the use of dummy guns, are considered legitimate as long as they do
not involve treachery or . and similar traps can be considered perfidious under the rules in certain circumstances.
Explicitly prohibited ruses under article 23 of the include improper use of a or the military
insignia of the enemy."
When Otto Skorzeny (a Waffen-SS commando leader) was on trial for war crimes, Forest Frederick Edward Yeo-Thomas,
a RAF officer and SOE agent (known as 'the White Rabbit'), testified that he and his men sometimes had been wearing
German uniforms when they killed German soldiers. He was highly decorated for his actions.
"Skorzeny admitted to ordering his men to wear US uniforms, but his defence argued that as long as enemy uniforms
were discarded before combat started, such a tactic was a legitimate .
On the final day of the trial, 9 September, , a former British agent, testified in defence of Skorzeny
and his operatives wearing US uniforms behind enemy lines, claiming that the Western Allies had actively contemplated
carrying out exactly the same kind of "false flag" operations; the Tribunal subsequently acquitted the ten defendants.
The Tribunal drew a distinction between using enemy uniforms during combat and for other purposes including deception
and were unable to prove that Skorzeny had given any orders to actually fight in U.S. uniforms."
--Wikipedia