Miscellaneous News

Bellum_Romanum

Brigadier
Registered Member
The US embargo against Iran is 1) illegal under international law, and 2) not Canadian law. It was US overreach with long-arm jurisdiction. So Canada played with fire and got burned. Maybe Canada should grow some balls and have an independent foreign policy and not get used by Trump/US, instead of trying to preach 'rule of law' which we know has no premise and is utter BS.
"Maybe Canada should grow some balls and have an independent foreign policy"

Impossible to ever happen. Just asked Defeinbaker and his successors. The sole exception would be Justin Trudeau's legendary Father, P.M. Pierre Elliott Trudeau. That dude has balls of steel.

The US embargo against Iran is 1) illegal under international law, and 2) not Canadian law. It was US overreach with long-arm jurisdiction. So Canada played with fire and got burned. Maybe Canada should grow some balls and have an independent foreign policy and not get used by Trump/US, instead of trying to preach 'rule of law' which we know has no premise and is utter BS.
 

Petrolicious88

Senior Member
Registered Member
Sure, that's how US always operates. This is not in dispute. From a legal perspective, wouldn't it be better for Huawei not having its CFO admitting its business relationship with Iran? We all know US wants to destroy Huawei, I am afraid today's development just made US legal case against huawei much stronger.
Admission of wrong is not the same as guilty. But the US has not dropped its case against Huawei, which has always been the real target. How big is the check or how big of a fine against Huawei is the next move. Canada is happy to finally get out of this drama.
 

texx1

Junior Member
Admission of wrong is not the same as guilty. But the US has not dropped its case against Huawei, which has always been the real target. How big is the check or how big of a fine against Huawei is the next move. Canada is happy to finally get out of this drama.
I would be great if it's only going to be fines. Let's hope Huawei doesn't end up like ZTE where it had to accept US compliance officers.
 

daifo

Captain
Registered Member
It's good that China is becoming more assertive in its dealing with the west since Xi took over. But the damage to Huawei consumer division is real and it will hobble huawei growth for years to come.

I would be great if it's only going to be fines. Let's hope Huawei doesn't end up like ZTE where it had to accept US compliance officers.

Politeness is over after they went after Huawei, it became apparent that the US is just trying to kill China's tech companies. China is trying to be self sufficent now with chips and as many other tech category as possible
 

Kaeshmiri

Junior Member
Registered Member
Not a fan of how the Michaels were instantly released.

1. Meng was released on American terms. The acting U.S. attorney in Brooklyn, said that in entering into the agreement, "Meng has taken responsibility for her principal role in perpetrating a scheme to defraud a global financial institution."
They can now further build the case against Huawei & legally target them not only in US but also in Europe on basis of her statement.

2. China always officially maintained that the 2 Michaels weren't in anyway linked with the Meng case. But them getting instantly released shows that this wasn't the truth and that there was no due process in their arrest or release and they were simply victims of hostage diplomacy.

Remember, Meng was never convicted but the Michales were and infact sentenced too. Both were not on the same pedestal. Espionage is a much much serious charge than what Meng was in for.

Also watch when the Michales land in Canada how they'll cry & claim they were tortured by Chinese authorities and fabricate all type of lies just to make them look like victims. At the end of the day thanks to American PR, Meng will be seen as a white collar fraud and the Michaels as victims.
 
Top