Miscellaneous News

Gatekeeper

Brigadier
Registered Member
Greed is okay, and that is the whole point of starting a business. For brands like Nio, xpeng and Li, they can gain more name recognition for their EV by listing in New York.

Yes, greed is ok. But when "greed is good" that's the point. No one is forcing the investors to buy. They buy even when they can't "audit" the financial statements. That's the point, because they got too greedy.

The capitalist will sell you the ropes for you to hang them with. Lennin i think.
 
Last edited:

Gatekeeper

Brigadier
Registered Member
It seems, after didi, they are going after a few more technology companies listed in the US.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Nothing unusual. You can bet your bottom dollar, US would do the same. In fact US have imposed quite alot of anti-freetrade restrictions on "security" ground. When things like this happens, the western MSM always point an accusing finger. But let's look I the mirror, shall we?

Pot and kettle comes to mind.
 

Gatekeeper

Brigadier
Registered Member
It seems, after didi, they are going after a few more technology companies listed in the US.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Can anyone here think if the reverse is happening on the U.S. the U.S. is going to do nothing. Look at the Huawei and the connection they made of the founder with the PLA!

Now compare and contrast!

DiDi’s Adrian Perica was an officer in the US Army graduated from West Point, also suspect to be an CIA agent. Didi Chuxing, the Chinese ride-hailing giant best understood as the “Uber of China” appointed Apple M&A chief Adrian Perico to to its Board of Directors as the representant of Apple to the Didi’s board – The Information reports – citing the filing and sources familiar with the matter.

Chinese regulator orders app stores to remove Didi, shows resolve to enhance data protection by Li Qiaoyi and Hu Yuwei Jul 04 2021

China's cyberspace regulator said on Sunday that it has ordered app stores to remove the nation's most widely used ride-hailing app Didi Chuxing, due to confirmed reports of "serious violations of law and regulation" in the collection and use of personal information.

Coming after the company was put under a review for cybersecurity on Friday - just two days after its massive IPO in the US, the latest order further underscored Chinese regulators' resolve to crack down on illegal activities on online platforms and enhance the protection of data security, analysts said.

The Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC) also told Didi to rectify problems in strict accordance with the law and relevant national standards to ensure the security of users' personal information, the CAC said in an announcement on Sunday.

On Friday, China's cybersecurity review office said that it has launched a review into Didi. During the review period, new user registration would be suspended "to prevent the expansion of risks," it said.

Didi quickly responded to the Sunday announcement, saying it would strictly comply with the requirements and make improvements for a secured service.

Didi halted new user registrations on Saturday, and the app will be taken down for rectification in strict accordance with relevant rules, the company said in a statement on Sunday.

Users who have downloaded the app can use it without interference.

The swift regulatory actions came just days after the ride-hailing platform raised $4.4 billion in its IPO on the New York Stock Exchange on Wednesday.

Its shares ended up 1 percent on the first day before soaring nearly 16 percent on Thursday.

But after the cybersecurity review announcement, shares plunged as much as nearly 11 percent before finishing down 5.3 percent on Friday.

Investors in Didi's US shares were apparently caught off guard by the review, and the company might be the target of a class action lawsuit.

Hao Junbo, chief lawyer at the HAO Law Firm in Beijing, told the Global Times on Sunday that some of Didi's investors have reached out to his law firm and are considering participating in a class action suit to seek compensation.

The regulatory actions against Didi, coming as China stepped up crackdown on illegal activities on online platforms including anti-monopoly and privacy law violations, showed Chinese regulators determination to strengthen protection for personal information and data, analysts said.

Reckoning the review as a timely move to institute a firewall to ensure data security, which is of vital significance to national security as a whole, Dong Shaopeng, a senior research fellow at the Chongyang Institute for Financial Studies at Renmin University of China, called for delisting of Didi's newly floated shares.

Ride-hailing firms manage large amounts of data regarding national transport infrastructure, flows of people and vehicles, among other types of information that involve national security, according to Dong.

The rise of "data sovereignty" versus the US government's vigilance against Chinese firms ought to be a wake-up call for national security awareness to be given priority when it comes to fundraising plans in areas that might pose threats to China's national security, Dong told the Global Times on Sunday.

Didi's global annual active users for the 12 months ended on March 31 stood at 493 million, according to the company.
 
Last edited:

Temstar

Brigadier
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Ignore all the noise about Xinjiang in this article, it's still the same tired old stories. Instead I direct your eyes to this aspect:
Nicolas Chapuis says sanctions on European parliamentarians are one area where Beijing can take steps to create political space
Or as I like to put it:

Don't sanction me! Sanction the country instead!
Sanctioning members of the CPC is useless politically. CPC members are part of the government machinery. Sanctioning them might annoy them (depending on how much dealing they want to have with overseas) but it has zero effect politically on the CPC. Yet the same cannot be said of the reverse when China sanctions politicians in the EU. Revolving door politics is such a core part of western democracy now and China's sanction have exposed it as a critical weakness in their political system. The longer the Chinese sanctions stands the more politicians become fearful of crossing China - unless you're okay with ending up doing ads for Taiwanese dried pineapple slices like Pompeo and make 100K a year for the rest of your life.

Also while we're at it, you know when you're bluffing you're not supposed to tell the other guy what you really want right? Keep bringing up CAI like that in front of China and you just confirm the suspicion that EU really wants the CAI.
 

KampfAlwin

Senior Member
Registered Member
Its been outed as a prank video on reddit
It might be a fake, but hoooooooly sh*t you can briefly see the brown liquid ejecting from his a**hole at Mach speed, just before he sat on the bucket. Unless you’re telling me he stuffed melted chocolate up his bum hole for the video?!
 
Top