Chinese Economics Thread

[Kaeshmiri]

China needs attack where Europe and America is weak. That means continued bolstering support for Russia and prying away Turkey from the west, which has betrayed them countless times. Western traders have hammered the Turkish lira and China should step-in with its bi-lateral currency swap. Also greater support needs to be given to the Iranians, essentially since America abandoned the JCPOA. Iranians are a smart and industrious people who have been hammered by unjustified sanctions. The stronger China's counter-alliance, the stronger we are in the face of counterattacks.

Too bad China is still a practitioner of the antiquated Non-Interference policy . Western countries fuel separatism and violence in China without any major repercussions. NI policy should only be applicable to those who are Non Interfering themselves.

The West has many weak points. Take the example of EU . Its a fragile bloc and the correct amount of funding to the right groups will easily result in its breakup ( If you ever watch RT you'll see how Russia is actively trying to fan Anti-EU sentiments in Europe). They got less money but they definitely make the best out of it.

 

[j17wang]

Too bad China is still a practitioner of the antiquated Non-Interference policy . Western countries fuel separatism and violence in China without any major repercussions. NI policy should only be applicable to those who are Non Interfering themselves.

The West has many weak points. Take the example of EU . Its a fragile bloc and the correct amount of funding to the right groups will easily result in its breakup ( If you ever watch RT you'll see how Russia is actively trying to fan Anti-EU sentiments in Europe). They got less money but they definitely make the best out of it.

China's Non-Interference policy died this week. China had that policy as a matter of pragmatism so it didnt get entangled in global wars like the soviets. In the face of an existential threat china has shown time and time again it can evolve with change conditions as needed to ensure the survival and growth of the nation. Now that the west is advocating for regime change of China, you will see China will start to fund separatist movements and insurgency all around the 5 eyes. China will take a softer approach with the EU, probably more along lines of trying to negotiate more bilateral deals with individual countries.

 

[daifo]

Too bad China is still a practitioner of the antiquated Non-Interference policy . Western countries fuel separatism and violence in China without any major repercussions. NI policy should only be applicable to those who are Non Interfering themselves.

The West has many weak points. Take the example of EU . Its a fragile bloc and the correct amount of funding to the right groups will easily result in its breakup ( If you ever watch RT you'll see how Russia is actively trying to fan Anti-EU sentiments in Europe). They got less money but they definitely make the best out of it.

The trouble is not really caused by the richer more economic powerful blocks of the EU that is more business minded. It is better to let Russia and nature takes its course or just sanction individual countries like the netherlands for its meddling.

 

[daifo]

China's Non-Interference policy died this week. China had that policy as a matter of pragmatism so it didnt get entangled in global wars like the soviets. In the face of an existential threat china has shown time and time again it can evolve with change conditions as needed to ensure the survival and growth of the nation. Now that the west is advocating for regime change of China, you will see China will start to fund separatist movements and insurgency all around the 5 eyes. China will take a softer approach with the EU, probably more along lines of trying to negotiate more bilateral deals with individual countries.

There is no need for China to interfer. US polticians/media/race relations/greedy captialist/ crazy influencers are all causing enough trouble within. The US has always just found some other country as a punching bag to deflect its internal issues. It is better for it to sell itself as the positive stabilizer rather than a country that goes around destabilizing others.

Chinese media and gov official just needs to start out explaining western atrocity as constant as the west complains about China's allege humae rights record, like int the Alaska meeting but more eloquently.

 

[j17wang]

There is no need for China to interfer. US polticians/media/race relations/greedy captialist/ crazy influencers are all causing enough trouble within. The US has always just found some other country as a punching bag to deflect its internal issues. It is better for it to sell itself as the positive stabilizer rather than a country that goes around destabilizing others.

Chinese media and gov official just needs to start out explaining western atrocity as constant as the west complains about China's allege humae rights record, like int the Alaska meeting but more eloquently.

There is a need to be active campaign against US, Australia, and UK, which are most vulnerable to separatist forces. New Zealand and Canada can be part of a wait-and-see approach, as they don't seem to be instigating so much as following. Its impossible for china to just keep reacting, you seize the initiative in foreign policy, like the russians.

 

[daifo]

There is a need to be active campaign against US, Australia, and UK, which are most vulnerable to separatist forces. New Zealand and Canada can be part of a wait-and-see approach, as they don't seem to be instigating so much as following. Its impossible for china to just keep reacting, you seize the initiative in foreign policy, like the russians.

Doesn't make sense, China still does 500 + billion in trade with these countries. A good portion of the theatrics is also for domestics politcal consumption. Have you seen where Russians economy has gone the past 2 decades? China hasn't even done the first step of just making better english propaganda. IE They hire some creepy/sleezy looking male western social media influencer (some are even allege sexual predators) rather than cultivate young modern fluent english speaking chinese. The way they translate some of the Chinese official statements are sometimes very cringy for the the english audience too.

 

[Tyler]

Its not possible to do that. Take example of Australia . It's 1000 miles away from US, its economy is dependent on China and yet it didn't hesitate for even a second to act as a lapdog for US. You cant chip away control without destroying the controller ie US.

US, EU, Australia etc may have many differences between them but at the end of the day they are White Nations driven by a sense of moral superiority over the rest of the World. They'll unite when they'll see a Non-White power rising.

China doesn't need to double its efforts wooing the imperialists but rather double its effort in Tech and Economy . The path to success lies in competing and winning.

Again it all goes back to the plan of double circulation economic strategy with emphasis on internal economic circulation. China's economy will double or triple with the right circulation.

 

[KYli]

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

 

[Hendrik_2000]

They say you cannot pick a winner in free market let the invisible hand allocate money and resource . government policy only distort and lead to waste
Well not in NEV China gov policy drove the explosive growth in NEV sale in China
The global electric vehicle market is heating up and China wants to dominate. The country has invested at least $60 billion to support the EV industry and it’s pushing an ambitious plan to transition to all electric or hybrid cars by 2035. Tesla entered the Chinese market in 2019 and has seen rapid growth. China sold roughly one million more EVs than the U.S. in 2020. But there are signs the U.S. is getting more serious about going electric. President Joe Biden announced a goal to reach net-zero emissions by 2050 and investments in green infrastructure. Watch the video to find out how China came to dominate the market and whether it’s too late for the U.S. to catch up.

 

[AssassinsMace]

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

I thought the Taiwanese didn't need China to buy their pineapples. Then quit your whining! Go find another market. Maybe they think like Australians that Chinese will revolt if they they don't get their Taiwanese pineapples so they're helping to keep the peace in China by selling Chinese people their pineapples so in fact China owes them.